Friday, October 25, 2013

Globe Puts D.C. Driver in Back Seat

I don't know if it is racism or sexism or both.

Related: Sunday Globe Special: Burying a Sisters' Love

They put this story at the bottom-right corner of page B14 in my printed pos:

"Boyfriend of woman killed in D.C. expressed concerns" by Michael Melia |  Associated Press, October 25, 2013

HARTFORD — The boyfriend of the woman who was shot to death after a car chase outside the US Capitol earlier this month called police several times last year to express concern about her emotional stability and the safety of their infant daughter, according to records released Thursday.

Miriam Carey, who had been diagnosed with postpartum depression and psychosis, told officers who responded to one of the calls to her Stamford condo Dec. 10 that she thought the president had her under surveillance.

Well, we are all under surveillance because the NSA is collecting everything; however, you see the ingenious propaganda at work here. You are simply crazy if you think Obama -- meaning the government he does not control -- is spying on you. You must be out of your mind! 

Yeap, right. What is crazy is believing anything coming from this government or its agenda-pushing mouthpiece of a jewspaper. 

Of course, if that is the case then Angela Merkel and the rest of the leaders of Europe need an examination.

‘‘She stated that President Obama put Stamford in lockdown after speaking to her, because she is the Prophet of Stamford,’’ the police report said.

The 34-year-old dental hygienist tried to ram her car through a White House barrier Oct. 3 before leading police on a chase that ended with her being killed.

That is a LIE because the FRONT of her CAR was UNDAMAGED! 

At this point, HOW CAN ANYONE BELIEVE what comes to FOLLOW?!?!

She leaves her 1-year-old daughter, who was in Carey’s black Infiniti during the chase, but was not seriously hurt.

Cops were lucky the kid wasn't hit.

Carey’s relatives have challenged law enforcement accounts that she was delusional and raised questions about whether police used an appropriate level of force. A lawyer for Carey’s sister did not respond to a request for comment.

Who would want to talk to the AmeriKan media other than agenda-pushing a$$holes and the you-know-jwhos?

Stamford police accounts of their interactions with Carey were released Thursday under a public records request. 

But records on the FBI murder of Todashev are sealed.

Carey’s boyfriend, Eric Francis, told police Dec. 10 that he feared for his daughter’s safety because Carey was not speaking rationally and had taken the girl outside in the cold and rain wearing only pajamas.

‘‘Miriam, she’s outside now with the baby without any coat. She’s just like physically.. . . I mean they definitely need to take her somewhere to get some help,’’ Francis said in a 911 call. ‘‘She locked herself in the bathroom, and the baby’s crying. It’s been going on for a week now.’’ Carey was escorted away in handcuffs.

Later that month, Francis called police twice in one night to report that Carey was acting irrationally and having delusions. Officers who responded found milk spattered around the apartment and said Carey was acting violently, saying she refused to go to the hospital. Carey attempted to kick one of the officers and was taken to an emergency room for evaluation.

The report said officers were aware of Carey’s condition and that ‘‘the boyfriend Eric was attempting to care for her and the child the best he can.’’

Doesn't seem to be a whole lot of concern.

--more--" 

Once again the media is not asking the pre$cription pharmaceutical que$tion, nor is there any information on the laptop they "found." Odd when they searched a garbage dump to frame the Tsarnaev friends.

Imho, this was no psyop. That this event is rarely referred to and was dropped so quickly points to it being another covered-up murder of American citizens by AmeriKan authority. 

UPDATE: MIRIAM CAREY - GLADIO TERROR OPERATION

Then again, I may be wrong.

Related: Saudi women in top council want debate on driving

Maybe the Saudis are on to something there:

"Saudi clerics decry bid by female drivers; Protesters accuse US of fomenting societal reforms" by Abdullah al-Shihri and Aya Batrawy |  Associated Press,  October 23, 2013

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Around 150 clerics and religious scholars held a rare protest outside the Saudi king’s palace on Tuesday against fresh efforts by women seeking the right to drive, highlighting the struggle faced by reformers in the ultraconservative kingdom.

Some of the senior religious leaders who protested outside the palace in the Red Sea port of Jiddah said the United States was behind a campaign calling for women to drive on Oct. 26. The driving campaign claims to have garnered 16,000 signatures.

I believe that for sure. It's one way of applying pressure to the regime.

The government has not cracked down on the effort, and King Abdullah is believed to favor some social reforms. The protest by clerics, who are among the most influential voices in Saudi Arabia, shows the challenge he faces in pushing gently for change without antagonizing conservative segments of the population.

The hard-line religious establishment has sway over the courts and oversees the often zealous religious police, run by the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, which enforces strict segregation of the sexes and other restrictive interpretations of Islamic Shariah laws.

These guys are our strongest Arab allies?

‘‘Why was the date of the protest [by women driving] given a Western date and not an Arab one?’’ asked prominent Sheik Nasser el-Omar at the rally, referring to the Islamic lunar calendar that differs from the Gregorian one used by the West. ‘‘This suggests the campaign was made in the USA,’’ he said in remarks carried by the semi-official news website Akhbar 24.

Since the right-to-drive campaign launched last month, Saudi women have been uploading videos and sharing pictures online of themselves driving. A number of Saudi women on the country’s top advisory body, the Shura Council, also put forth a request this month to discuss the issue of allowing women to drive, though no debate has yet taken place.

While neither Islamic law nor Saudi’s traffic laws explicitly ban women from driving, they are not issued licenses.

Previously, some female drivers have been arrested and charged with disturbing public order. One woman was ordered to be lashed 10 times, but King Abdullah pardoned her.

No women have been arrested trying to drive in recent weeks. In one case, two women were pulled over by police in the main city of Riyadh after one of them posted on Twitter a picture of the other driving.

Eman al-Nafjan’s brother, Khalid, said after the incident that the police were polite with his sister and her friend but made them call their husbands to pick them up. The two women had to sign letters promising not to drive again and their husbands had to sign letters stating they would not let their wives drive again, her brother said.

He said that the family is very supportive of Nafjan’s efforts, but she was targeted on Twitter. ‘‘Saudi Arabia is a tribal community, so it is a matter of [fact] that you need to be more conservative about your thoughts . . . your actions. Everything has a reaction in the community,’’ he said in a telephone interview.

That women have not yet been arrested in this month’s driving campaign suggests authorities have taken a softer approach.

This has angered ultraconservative scholars. Some of the protesting clerics were quoted in the local media saying that Saudi rulers are not doing anything to stop the campaign.

Not present at the rally was the imam, or leading sheik, of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Islam’s holiest site toward which observant Muslims pray five times a day.

However, Saud al-Shuraim supported the clerics’ protest via his Twitter account, which says that calls for women to drive are an offense against the king and ‘‘aimed at unraveling the beads of wisdom in a cohesive society.’’

One prominent cleric who has bucked the ultraconservative trend is former Grand Mosque imam, Sheik Adel el-Kilbani. He wrote on his Twitter account recently that he hopes women may soon be allowed to drive.

And let dangerous and crazy women on the roads?

--more--"

Isn't it obvious, folks? Guns kill people, booze kills people, and women driver's kill people so they should all be banned. Saudi Arabia has got it right.

Also see: Driving a clever move against larger injustices

Looks like the clerics were right, and Kohn Kerry says we are all on the same page now. 

The beheadings and maiming in the dispensation of Saudi justice not as much of a concern as women behind the wheel, 'eh?