"But the Legislature could amend or repeal the new law, as they have done with prior initiatives passed by the voters"
Then WHY DID WE EVEN BOTHER VOTING? Why even have questions?
Of course, anything that might actual help you stay alive, this government opposes.
"Study: Smoking Pot Doesn't Cause Cancer--It May Prevent It! Smoking Cannabis Does Not Cause Cancer Of Lung or Upper Airways, Tashkin Finds; Data Suggest Possible Protective Effect"
(Inhale sound from blog author)
What was I talking about?
:-)
"Voters approve marijuana law change" by David Abel, Globe Staff | November 5, 2008
Voters yesterday overwhelmingly approved a ballot initiative to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, making getting caught with less than an ounce of pot punishable by a civil fine of $100. The change in the law means someone found carrying dozens of joints will no longer be reported to the state's criminal history board.
"The people were ahead of the politicians on this issue; they recognize and want a more sensible approach to our marijuana policy," said Whitney Taylor, chairwoman of the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, which campaigned for the ballot initiative. "They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes. They recognize under the new law that the punishment will fit the offense."
The proposition will become law 30 days after it is reported to the Governor's Council, which usually meets in late November or early December. But the Legislature could amend or repeal the new law, as they have done with prior initiatives passed by the voters, said Emily LaGrassa, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Martha Coakley.
Opponents of the proposition said they are concerned about the potential consequences of the vote. "The administration is clear in its opposition to the decriminalization of marijuana, and we are concerned about the effects of ballot Question 2's passage," Kevin Burke, secretary of the state's Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, said in a statement. He would not comment on whether the administration will try to repeal the law, which will require violators younger than 18 to complete a drug awareness program and community service. The fine would increase to as much as $1,000 for those who fail to complete the program.
How about REPEALING the LYING WARS the kids are being sent to, you FUCKING GOD-DAMN FASCIST LIBERALS!!!!!!!!
Proponents of the initiative, who spent about $1 million promoting it, argued the change in the law would maintain the state's existing penalties for growing, trafficking, or driving under the influence of marijuana, while ensuring that those caught with less than an ounce of pot would avoid the taint of a criminal record.
The opponents, who include the governor, attorney general, and district attorneys around the state, argued that decriminalizing marijuana possession would promote drug use and benefit drug dealers at a time when they say marijuana has become more potent. They warned it would increase violence on the streets and safety hazards in the workplace, and cause the number of car crashes to rise as more youths drive under the influence.
Yeah, even though those HYPOCRITICAL DAs GOT STONED!!!!
And I am TIRED of the EXTREMIST BOOGA-BOOGA!!!
Go ahead and LEGALIZE DRUGS!! I ain't gonna buy any.
You gonna rush right out for a pack of joints, folks?
In a statement, the Coalition for Safe Streets, which opposed the initiative, blamed the loss on being outspent by supporters of Question 2, which included the billionaire financier George Soros, who spent more than $400,000 in favor of decriminalizing marijuana.
"Now these pro-drug special interests will move on to another state as part of their plan to inflict a radical drug-legalization agenda on as many communities as possible," said the statement.
There they go again!!!! Of course, when it is spending on KEEPING the YOKE of an income tax, that's O.K.!!!!
The Rev. Bruce Wall, pastor of Global Ministries Christian Church in Dorchester, was among several prominent black ministers in Boston who called on fellow clergy to oppose the initiative.
"I guess there are a lot of people smoking the stuff, and they don't see what we see," Wall said. --more--"
See: Black Ministers of Boston, Massachusetts, Want to Keep Black Youth Down for my comments on that last par, Rev!
Here is some of what they cut:
"But officials at the state's Criminal History Systems Board, said that marijuana possession arrests and convictions are records that remain visible to many employers, even if the charges were dismissed.
The records of arrests alone are available to schools, law enforcement agencies, nursing homes, camps, and most companies employing someone who works with children or the elderly.
Certified professional groups overseeing lawyers, doctors, nurses, plumbers, electricians, and others can review records for pending cases - before adjudication - as well as any convictions. Noncertified employers can see only convictions punishable with a jail sentence of five years or more."
Yeah, you wouldn't want to give any context there, would you, Globe?
Coincidence that the Globe encouraged a NO vote on the question?
