We will find out tonight....
"Voters this year have rejected almost two-thirds of overrides; Reflects dislike for tax hikes amid downturn" by Matt Viser, Globe Staff | November 4, 2008
Voters in Massachusetts cities and towns have rejected nearly two-thirds of property tax overrides so far this year, the greatest rate of failure in more than a decade. It is a reflection of residents' dislike for local property tax increases during an economic downturn and foretells potential danger for override requests on today's local election ballots.
Translation: NO MORE TAXES to be WASTED on LYING LOOTERS and PARASITICAL POLITICIANS! Which means QUESTION ONE WINS BIG in a FAIR ELECTION!
"No one has an appetite for an override," said Lisa Pacheco, chairwoman of the Board of Selectmen in Freetown, where eight override efforts failed this year. "It's the economic times."
Proposition 2 1/2, approved in 1980, requires local officials to obtain voter approval when seeking property tax increases larger than 2.5 percent. Town officials frequently put such questions to voters to pay for town services. The concerns this year are heightened as communities try to gird themselves for further economic problems.
Governor Deval Patrick announced a plan last month to fill a $1.4 billion midyear budget gap without reducing local aid payments, but he and other state leaders have not ruled out cutting those payments if the economy gets worse. In addition, the budget scenarios are likely to get worse if a recession, which is likely, clamps down on home values, restricts business growth, and reduces corporate tax revenue - which all have an impact on state and local coffers.
Yup, while Massachusetts Literally Throws Tax Dollars Away
Communities have already started cutting back by instituting hiring freezes, cutting library hours, and raising fees.
"There's no more tricks up my sleeve. We'll be cutting to the bone with further cuts," said Mayor James E. Harrington of Brockton, where voters today will signal whether they are willing to increase their property taxes - an initiative some city officials are already predicting will fail. "I'm optimistic," Harrington said. "Although I know all the signs aren't good because of all that happened to the economy. People are paying more for fuel and heating oil. It's a lot to ask them to do."
Now watch the Boston Globe turn into an agenda-pushing, pro-tax pimp.
If Brockton residents approve three overrides totaling $3.6 million, it would result in a $100 annual increase to the average tax bill. The Police Department would hire 10 patrolmen, the Fire Department would hire six firefighters, and the city's libraries, which are down to eight staffers, would return to full service. The schools would also get $2.25 million. The city hasn't attempted an override since 1991, when a vote failed.
East Bridgewater, for the second time in a year, is looking for a $1.25 million tax increase to create a fund for capital projects. A similar proposal failed last year.
"We're reaching a point where it becomes less effective to rely on funding municipal services through overrides," said Geoff Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association. "The overall passage rate is down and local cities and towns are facing greater fiscal pressure."
In Freetown, a Southeastern Massachusetts community where eight overrides failed in July, even a request for $5,000 for the Board of Assessors was rejected. It would have added $3.48 to the average tax bill. Because the overrides, totaling $740,300, failed, the town reduced hours at the library and town hall, laid off eight people at the schools and three police officers, and reduced training at the Fire Department. "Every household is cutting back, and that's what we hear from residents in town: You need to cut back," Pacheco said.
So VOTE YES on QUESTION ONE!!!!!
Sudbury, which hadn't rejected an override since 1993, attempted two overrides in May, totaling $4.6 million. Both failed, by a nearly 2-to-1 ratio. Yarmouth officials tried overrides in May, June, and September. All of them failed. Property taxes, which vary widely and range from an average of about $700 to $14,500, go toward paying for all types of municipal services, from teacher salaries to trash pickup.
I haven't commented much, but can you see the blatant bias in favor of taxes?
The challenge for the backers of overrides rises during an economic downturn, according to historical data. Not only are residents less willing to approve property tax increases, but real estate values decline and construction of new homes and businesses slows, which means less new revenue. Fewer residents are buying cars, which reduces the amount of money raised through the excise tax.
About 53 percent of local budget revenues comes from the property tax, a historic high, Beckwith said, and that has led some to call for local options to raise taxes on meals, hotels, or telephone companies. The governor filed legislation last year to give municipalities those options, but it failed in the Legislature.
O.K. if the PROPERTY TAX is ALREADY the HIGHEST in HISTORY, then WHERE is ALL that STATE LOOT going? Into the hands of CORPORATIONS and SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS, huh?
Despite the economic downturn, in several communities voters continue to approve overrides. --more--"
Well, that is THEIR PROBLEM!!!!
