"Cash-strapped states taking new look at online gambling; Efforts to legalize it likely to draw federal scrutiny" August 14, 2011|By Matt Richtel, New York Times
NEW YORK - The District of Columbia is not thrilled that its residents are traveling to Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia to gamble in casinos. Starved for cash, like states across the country, the district wants some of the millions in revenue that gambling generates each year.
So district officials want residents to gamble closer to home - inside their homes, actually. Or in cafes, restaurants, and bars. By year end, the district hopes to introduce an Internet gambling hub that would allow Washington residents to play blackjack, poker, and other casino-style games.
It’s an idea gaining currency around the country: virtual gambling as part of the antidote to local budget woes.
The District of Columbia is the first to legalize it, while Iowa is studying it, and bills are pending in Massachusetts, California, and other states....
Related: Sunday Globe Special: Gambling On a Sure Thing
So what is with the lie, NYT?
“We need money,’’ said Matt Fitzgerald, legislative director for Michael Rush, a Democratic state senator from Boston, who last month introduced a bill to allow the Massachusetts lottery to test an expansion into other “games of chance,’’ but not poker....
Yeah, never mind the $100 million slated for debt service to banks or the $82 million forked over to Hollywood, among other things.
Someone calling your bluff:
But the states may run into trouble with the Justice Department, which has been cracking down on all forms of Internet gambling. And their efforts have given rise to critics who say legalized online gambling will promote addictive wagering and lead to personal debt troubles.
AS IF THIS GOVERNMENT could LECTURE and MORALIZE to ANYONE about DEBT TROUBLE!!
“States had looked at this haphazardly and not very energetically until the Great Recession hit, but now they’re desperate for money,’’ said I. Nelson Rose, a professor at Whittier Law School who specializes in gambling issues.
When it comes to taxing gambling, he said, “the thing they have left is the Internet.’’
Yeah, THAT is why they want it to be LEGAL!! Has NOTHING to do with FREEDOM or your RIGHTS!!
The moves by the District of Columbia and the states have put them into a murky legal area with a potentially big obstacle. The Justice Department in recent years has vigorously pursued operators of offshore Internet casinos, shutting down their sites and arresting their executives when they travel to the United States.
The agency’s position has been that these operations violate federal laws including the Wire Act of 1961, which prohibits wagering over telecommunications systems that cross state or national borders. But legal experts say the law sent a mixed message. It seems to carve out an explicit exception for states to run online gambling operations....
Meaning the STATE DOES NOT LIKE COMPETITION when it comes to LOOTING YOU!!!
It’s not all about revenue.
PFFFFFFFFT!!
In Iowa, which is running a budget surplus, lawmakers say they want to legalize online poker to create a regulated forum for a popular activity.
So they can see you in that smoky back room.
“A number of Iowans are doing it and may not even realize it’s illegal,’’ said Jeff Danielson, a Democrat and the president pro tempore of the state Senate. “We want a regulated environment that’s safe and protects consumers.’’
Translation: WE WANT OUR CUT of the POT!!
--more--"
Related: Massive Northern Calif. marijuana raids net 630k plants
I thought the back room smelled sort of funny.
