Thursday, February 7, 2013

All A.O.K. With This Alabama Article

I would say once would have been an aberration, but the last few days of rewritten pieces makes one suspicious. Must have the official version all straight now.

"Alabama captor rigged bunker with explosives; Abducted boy is back home, said to be doing well" by Jay Reeves and Kate Brumback  |  Associated Press, February 07, 2013

MIDLAND CITY, Ala. — As FBI and police negotiators sought for days to coax an Alabama man into freeing a kindergartner held hostage in an underground bunker, the captor was planning for violence, authorities say.

I don't believe in authorities anymore, sorry, and planning for violence is the government's mode of operation. 

He rigged the bunker with explosives, tried to reinforce it against any raid, and when SWAT agents stormed the shelter Monday to rescue the boy, Jimmy Lee Dykes engaged in a firefight that left the captor dead, the FBI and other officials said.

They have been caught lying so often for far too long to believe anything they say. It's a cover-your-ass operation coming at me from an intelligence operation we call a newspaper over here in AmeriKa -- even on something like this, never mind the big stuff like bank fraud and wars. 

After the nearly weeklong ordeal, relatives say the boy who turned 6 on Wednesday appears to be doing well and is back at home. He was seized from a crowded school bus Jan. 29 after authorities say the 65-year-old gunman killed the driver and took the child to the bunker, where he was held until Monday’s rescue.

While the FBI has largely been tight-lipped about how it monitored Dykes’s behavior and mood in the days leading up to the rescue, the latest disclosures suggest authorities were dealing with an abductor fully prepared for more violence even as he allowed police to send food, medicine, and toys into the bunker for the boy.

Ya' gettin' all that?

An FBI statement late Tuesday said Dykes had planted an explosive device in a ventilation pipe he’d told negotiators to use to communicate with him on his property in the rural Alabama community of Midland City....

Then how did the camera you guys allegedly ran down the pipe allow you to see he was armed? And why isn't any of that addressed in this article?

Children and teachers were trying to get back to normal....

--more--"

Yup, NOTHING about Dykes' body still being in the bunker, and nothing about an autopsy as rigor mortis and other things set in. Hey, it's not important to know what happened or how Dykes was killed, right? He deserved to die for being the type of person he was, right? 

Well, I'll tell you WHY that has been forgotten: because an autopsy would PROBABLY SHOW -- I mean, think this through logically and deductively, readers -- that DYKES WAS SHOT in the BACK as he CROUCHED in a CORNER of his hole!! I mean, the feds BLEW OPEN the HOLE to ENTER! Then the agent that entered shot him in the back! 

Look, we will likely never know what really happened (and certainly not from relying on official sources and their media mouthpieces), but I think I've just sketched out a likely and plausible scenario. The choice is yours. Who do you want to believe, a lying, pos, murderous government or me?