"Two Calif. cities make latest bid to tax sugary drinks" by Candice Choi | Associated Press July 13, 2014
WASHINGTON — If two of the most progressive US cities don’t pass a tax on sugary drinks, will the idea finally fizzle out?
Sugary drinks have been under fire for years, with many blaming them for rising rates of obesity and chronic diseases. Yet efforts to curb consumption by imposing taxes and other measures have failed, in part because the beverage industry has spent millions to defeat the efforts.
Now, the question of whether a bottle of Dr Pepper with 64 grams of sugar should be treated like a pack of cigarettes is being considered in San Francisco and Berkeley, with the two California cities aiming to become the country’s first to pass per-ounce taxes on sugary drinks.
The stakes are high, especially given the Bay Area’s reputation for liberal politics. If approved, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and other companies fear it could galvanize health advocates elsewhere. If defeated, the idea of a soda tax could be dead.
I'm so sick of money-grubbing government scrounging at all levels. Maybe if you guys weren't shoveling money at banks and the already wealthy you wouldn't need to try and get blood from a stone.
‘‘The industry is really motivated to beat us here. If they can beat us in San Francisco and Berkeley, nobody is going to take them on,’’ said Larry Tramutola, the political consultant handling the campaign in support of the tax in Berkeley.
The odds are not in favor of taxes. Since 2009, about 30 special taxes on sugary drinks have been introduced across the country. Few have gained traction and none have prevailed.
Chris Gindlesperger, a spokesman for the American Beverage Association, the lobbying group for Coke and Pepsi, says the failures show people don’t support the idea.
Others say the industry uses unfair tactics to defeat measures, such as setting up groups with names like ‘‘Citizens Against Beverage Taxes,’’ which sound like they are community-driven but are not.
In San Francisco and Berkeley, supporters of the tax say they are better organized to battle such tactics. They are hitting the streets to educate voters and plan to run TV ads, work phone banks, and mail fliers.
The San Francisco proposal is for a two-cent-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks and would not apply to milk or natural fruit juices without any added sugars. It needs a two-thirds vote to pass in the November election.
The tax in Berkeley is for a penny per ounce and needs a simple majority of the vote.
It's just a penny or two. It's worth it to watch some city $cum waste or steal it.
It’s a high bar either way. Just two years ago, similar measures were soundly defeated in other California cities.
In New York City, former mayor Michael Bloomberg pushed to cap the size of sugary drinks sold in restaurants and other venues at 16 ounces. The move was shot down after legal challenges spearheaded by the beverage industry.
Take a big gulp, Mike.
