"Palestinians assail Gingrich remarks; In an interview, candidate refers to ‘invented’ people" by Diaa Hadid Associated Press / December 11, 2011
A slew of Palestinian officials reacted with dismay Saturday to Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich’s statement that the Palestinians are an “invented’’ people.
Isn't that a bit like saying they are subhuman?
The Jewish Channel, a U.S. cable TV network, released excerpts of the interview on Friday in which the former House speaker said Palestinians were not a people because they never had a state and because they were part of the Ottoman Empire before the British mandate and Israel’s creation.
See: Palestinians are an invented people, says Newt Gingrich
How was Israel created anyway?
--NOMORE--"
Remember, there was no Palestine as a state — (it was) part of the Ottoman Empire. I think we have an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and historically part of the Arab community and they had the chance to go many places," Gingrich said, according to a video excerpt posted online.
I'm astonished at the statement.
The Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad, demanded Gingrich "review history."
"From the beginning, our people have been determined to stay on their land," Fayyad said in comments carried by the Palestinian news agency Wafa. "This, certainly, is denying historical truths."
Well, some you can deny without a furor and others....
On Saturday, Gingrich's campaign released a statement affirming the position and saying his comments in the recent interview were made in reference to the region's history.
Gingrich's statements struck at the heart of Palestinian sensitivities about the righteousness of their national struggle.
Palestinians never had their own state — they were ruled by the Ottoman Empire for hundreds of years, like most of the Arab world. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed in the aftermath of World War I, the British, then a global colonial power, took control of the area, then known as British Mandate Palestine. During that time, Jews, Muslims and Christians living on the land were identified as "Palestinian."
Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi said Gingrich had "lost touch with reality." She said his statements were "a cheap way to win (the) pro-Israel vote."
Why is that vote so important in an AMERICAN election?
Palestinians bristle at the implication that they were generic Arabs with no specific attachment to the land that Zionist Jews coveted.
And they are still stealing it.
Using the word "Palestinians" is a way for them to emphasize their claims.
Palestinians are culturally Arabs — they speak Arabic and their culture is broadly shared by other Arabs who live in the eastern Mediterranean.
For Palestinians, their identity was hewed over decades of fighting against another nationalist struggle over the same land — that of Zionist Jews.
During the war surrounding the Jewish state's creation in 1948, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled, or were forced to flee their homes.
Not only did they have the "chance" to go many places, they were FORCED TO GO!!
Gingrich's reasoning was popular in the decades following Israel's creation, although that argument has since fallen out of favor among mainstream Israelis.
So Newt is stuck in the past, huh? That would be a good place to leave him.
That's what my printed Globe gave me.
--MORE--"
Also see: Globe's Gingrich Garbage Can
Newt's campaign headed for it now, as are my Globes.
