Monday, February 16, 2015

No School Lunch Today

Or all week, for that matter:

"How school lunch fight will shape America’s future" by John E. Sununu, Globe Columnist  February 16, 2015

I’ve reached the age where discussing “the way things used to be” with my children takes on the aura of a script for Dana Carvey’s “Grumpy Old Man” character. In Carvey’s world, the past was always tougher. The water was dirty, the toys were dangerous, and instead of movies, “we had one show in town — it was called stare at the sun!” Michelle Obama’s school lunch initiative, however, has managed to turn that world upside down. Whether you are 25 or 75, one look at the food served in schools today will leave you pining for the rich gastronomy of your grade-school cafeteria.

There is something amiss in Lunch Lady Land. Children are in revolt, school boards under fire. Even the School Nutrition Association is alarmed by the consequences of the first lady’s signature “Healthy Kids Act” of 2010. You can see for yourself, but be warned: The photos tweeted by students under the hashtag #thanksMichelleObama are not for the faint of heart. Forget about the battles over immigration, Iran, or Obamacare. The coming clash over school lunch will shape America’s future. After all, it will largely determine whether or not our children think all politicians are fools.

The problem here is not one of intent. Michelle Obama isn’t naive or misguided for believing that nutrition is important, or that sound menus might help improve children’s health. But it’s both naive and arrogant to think that federal legislation is the best mechanism for achieving those goals. In fact, it’s difficult to find a more egregious example of the nanny-state run amok.

Swept up by the euphoria of good intentions, a Democrat-led Congress pushed the bill through in 2010. The resulting regulations establish caps on calories, outlaw traditional flour-based pasta, and limit the fat content of milk. Don’t even think about serving white bread. You know things have gone too far when New York’s senators have to petition the federal government to declare “Greek yogurt” to be an acceptable source of protein for 8-year-olds. Senator Susan Collins’s victorious defense of the Maine potato was a tour de force.

The unintended consequences of this unprecedented meddling would be laughable if it didn’t represent such a tragic waste of time and money. A government audit reveals that during the past two years, more than 1 million students have walked away from school lunch programs. More than 80 percent of schools report an increase in the amount of food waste. And school lunch administrators report a significant increase in costs.

In an interview with Cooking Light magazine, the first lady reassures us that all will be fine once we’ve raised a generation whose only experience was horrible school lunches. “If all they know are whole grains and vegetables, by the time they’re graduating . . . they won’t know anything different.” That sounds more like indoctrination than education, all the more so when her own children attend private schools that are exempted from the rules.

Set aside for a moment the ridiculous level of micromanagement — would it really be a national scandal if the staff at your local elementary school indulged students with 2 percent milk? The more fundamental question is why we won’t allow states to set reasonable goals for feeding their own students. Does Michelle Obama feel that school administrators in Nashua, Newton, or Hartford are less trustworthy than federal bureaucrats?

Equally important, doesn’t the federal government have anything better to do? Apparently, the first lady doesn’t think so, nor do the legislators who pushed for the sweeping rules in the first place. For them, it’s about control and the kind of self-gratification that comes from writing bills that tell other people to do the right thing — or else. It’s also about the paternalistic and dangerous idea that anything that’s a good idea should be a law, and preferably a federal law: Wear your seat belt, eat whole-grain pasta, and — please! — only 1.8 gallons per toilet flush.

No one should condone poor decision-making, and no one should belittle the value of maintaining a healthy, balanced diet. But the fact that some people will make poor lifestyle choices is the natural result of a government that allows people to make choices in the first place. The alternative — a government that actively legislates, regulates, and manipulates personal behavior — is far worse.

These rules aren’t the end of the world. They’re just foolish, expensive, and statist. The federal government should get out of the menu business. It’s hard to believe, but school food was better in the old days. Just ask any 12-year-old — or a grumpy old man. It’s one thing on which they can finally agree.

--more--"

As you can see, I didn't touch it.

"Shortfall may lead to closing of ‘handful’ Boston schools; Targeted facilities to be named soon; deficit in budget could reach $51m" by James Vaznis, Globe Staff  February 04, 2015

Interim Superintendent John McDonough is proposing to close a “handful” of schools under a preliminary budget proposal for the next school year that he presented to the School Committee on Wednesday night.

The $1 billion spending plan also calls for other cuts, such as streamlining menu offerings in school cafeterias and possibly ending bus service for most seventh-graders.

Meaning they would have to risk traveling on the T or walking the streets to get home.

The latter measure was approved by the School Committee last year but was put on hold in light of growing opposition from parents and elected officials.

The cuts, McDonough said in an interview before the meeting, are an unfortunate reality the school system must face as the cost of doing business rises faster than revenue, creating a potential shortfall of $42 million to $51 million.

Uh-huh. 

Sort of $trange $ophi$try coming from the schools when the economy is roaring, blah, blah. 

It's $ame old goddamn excu$es every time!

He called the situation frustrating, noting the system has had to cut spending each of the past several years, and said it requires “difficult trade-off decisions to position us for long-term success.”

It $ure as hell is!

The shortfall also comes as the school system has pursued some costly initiatives, such as expanding pre-kindergarten, increasing the number of schools with extended days, and giving schools greater latitude to hire teachers from the outside, which in turn leaves veteran teachers without job assignments.

McDonough said the targeted schools will be named in the next two weeks. The proposal is expected to stir emotions and considerable public debate....

You know who is to blame, right?

--more--" 

Still waiting.

Related: Boston School $y$tem Thinks You Are Stupid

Special Ed classes are still being held:

"A Pennsylvania appeals court said a special-education teacher should not have been fired for hanging an ‘‘I abuse animals’’ sign around the neck of an autistic, mentally challenged 14-year-old who hit a goat during a petting-zoo field trip. The Commonwealth Court’s ruling Monday upholds an arbitrator’s decision to convert Bruce Millheim’s firing from the Bethlehem-area Colonial Intermediate Unit to a 53-day unpaid suspension. Arbitrator Rochelle Kaplan reversed Millheim’s December 2011 firing despite finding fault with the sign and other discipline measures, including calling students sissy and crybaby, twisting arms, and pushing heads."

Looks like bullying.

"A Manchester police officer investigating a theft bought a “desperate and hungry” suspect a meal at McDonald’s before charging her. The incident unfolded at about 8:30 Friday morning when officers Lisa Mackey and Kevin Gelinas responded to a call from a woman who said her purse had been stolen. The officers found the suspects’ car in the parking lot of a McDonald’s. Christopher Greene was in the car and his girlfriend, Holly Solans, was inside the restaurant. Solans, 20, told Mackey they were homeless, had been living in the car, and needed food. Mackey bought Solans a sandwich, let her eat, then charged her with receiving stolen property. Greene was charged with possession of heroin (AP)."

Isn't that entrapment?