Occupation Iraq: Obama Backs Up Brits

Now let me get this straight: If we are REPLACING BRITISH SOLDIERS who are leaving, where are the TROOP REDUCTIONS going to come from?

Or are there to be NO TROOP REDUCTIONS at all?

Man, I am tired of the MSM and their shit swirleys!

"Reports assert Britain to begin Iraq withdrawal; BBC, papers say pullout will begin in March" by John F. Burns, New York Times | December 11, 2008

Oh, John Burns. The guy who called the Fallujah resistance satanic and devilish when they strung up our war contractor mercenaries.

Funny how he never mentions U.S. chemical weapons use on the place!

LONDON - .... American military commanders have contingency plans for American troops to replace the departing British units at their base outside Basra, the principal city in southern Iraq, and the British news reports yesterday said that was now a firm plan. But there has been no announcement of the shift from the Pentagon, possibly because the planning process there is now caught up with the Bush-Obama transition that will not be complete until Obama's inauguration in January....

And the MSM doesn't want the AmeriKan public getting pissed that this guy is RENEGING on ANOTHER CAMPAIGN PLEDGE!

British commanders have said that they need to get their troops out of Iraq without immediately recommitting them to Afghanistan as part of a broader plan to lower the "operational tempo" of Britain's military commitments, which have placed severe strains on Britain's armed forces.

Ha!

George W. Bush also wrecked England's Army with his crock-of-shit- lies!!!

--more--"

Also see: Prop 102: Iraq and Government Lies