"Class-action cases topped high court rulings" by Mark Sherman, Associated Press / June 26, 2011
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority made it harder for people to band together to sue the nation’s largest businesses in the two most far-reaching rulings of the term the justices are wrapping up tomorrow.
Yeah, because it would hurt their investment portfolio.
The two cases putting new limits on class-action lawsuits were among more than a dozen in which the justices divided 5 to 4 along familiar ideological lines, with the winning side determined by the vote of Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Women made up one-third of the nine-member court for the first time ever this year, but missing from the court’s docket was a case that could be called historic.
Next year and 2013 could look very different, with potentially divisive and consequential cases on immigration, gay marriage, and health care making their way to the high court.
The makeup of the court, however, is not expected to change.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the court would finish its business tomorrow when the justices will announce decisions in four remaining cases, including two First Amendment disputes.
In one, video game makers are leading a challenge to a California law that bars the sale or rental of violent video games to children. The case was argued nearly eight months ago, when it appeared a majority of the court was inclined to strike down the law. The other case involves a campaign finance law in Arizona that rewards candidates who accept public funds with additional cash when privately funded rivals and independent groups exceed certain spending thresholds.
Also tomorrow, the justices are expected to decide whether to hear several important cases next term. They include:
■ Whether police need a search warrant before they place a global positioning device on a car to track a suspect’s movements.
■ A challenge to the constitutionality of the Federal Communications Commission regulation of indecency on television.
■ Suits against defense contractors over claims of abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
■ Yet another business-backed challenge to class-action suits in state courts.--more--"
Also see: The Women of Wal-Mart
Supreme Court Writes Prescription For Pharmaceuticals
Supreme Court Says You Do NOT Have the Right to an Attorney
Next Day Update:
Globe Editorial The Supreme Court goes soft on mutual fund misstatements
