Another rip-off:
"Design selected for R.I. Holocaust memorial" April 20, 2012|By Erika Niedowski
PROVIDENCE - A design incorporating granite columns and simulated
railroad tracks has been selected for a Holocaust memorial planned for
Rhode Island’s capital, and the Jewish group overseeing its construction
is beginning a fund-raising campaign to make the monument a reality....
It also contains a pathway inlaid with a pattern meant to
suggest railroad tracks, reminiscent of the railways that carried Jews
to the Nazi concentration camps across Europe in the 1930s and 1940s. It
becomes narrower as it progresses, to represent the diminishing ranks
of the Jewish population....
Then why did their numbers INCREASE between 1941 and 1948?
“It’s
really important to have a physical reminder of what happened, because
this is really the last generation of young people who will be able to
actually speak with survivors,’’ Alice Goldstein, now 80,
of Warwick, who sits on the memorial design committee, said of the planned
Rhode Island Holocaust memorial. “We are not going to be around another
10 or 15 years. It’s really important to plan for the future.’’
Yes, it is IMPORTANT that the MYTH$ CONTINUE and that young minds are indoctrinated and inculcated in Jewish dogma!
The
Jewish Alliance aims to raise about $800,000 for the memorial. Herb
Stern, chairman of the Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island’s
memorial committee,
said he hopes the monument will be completed by this time next year....
--more--"
Now, about that history I was taught:
"Hilter was an evil maniac hell bent on world domination who
ruthlessly murdered six million Jews in Nazi extermination camps during
the course of WWII.
After careful review, the entire history of WWI and WWII taught in
Western schools and promoted by establishment historians, academics, and
journalists seems to be carefully crafted propaganda serving a
particular supremacist global agenda.
Far from being an evil, bloodthirsty monster, Adolf Hilter was a proud,
patriotic German nationalist who sought to free his nation from the
grips of international Jewry and their destructive agenda of economic
domination, media monopoly, and social control. Or maybe he was a puppet
of the Jewish bankers that fomented both WWI and WWII, as many people whose opinion I respect and value have put forth? I used to buy this Hitler was a Zionist Stooge narrative, but have since changed my mind, mainly because of things like this, this, this, and this to name only a few examples.
But the fact remains that the standard history of WWII is completely
fraudulent, especially the Jewish Holocaust myth and the extreme,
irrational demonization of Adolf Hitler. During WWII, the Jewish
controlled Allies (the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union
primarily) were used to destroy the threat National Socialist Germany
posed to international Jewry’s parasitic usurious banking scheme that
has been imposed on much of the world for centuries now. The Six Million Jews Killed in a Holocaust
official narrative is a particularly pernicious PYSOP on the global
public, meant to justify the creation of Israel and limit any and all
criticism of Jewish power, crime, and subterfuge. There were real
Holocausts in WWII, but they were perpetrated by the Jews (through their
control of Allied governments) on non-Jews, which I recently wrote
about here. In fact, the Six Million myth is more about occult Jewish prophecy rather than the facts of WWII.
Bottom line: the official government approved and Hollywood reinforced
narrative about Hitler, WWII, and the alleged Jewish Holocaust is
complete bunk, and should be rejected by any clear thinking, rational
individual.
--SOURCE--"
Also see: Hitler’s freedom from International Debt Slavery
I must admit, the HOLOHOAX™ lie was one of the most crushing and difficult to absorb.
Having been raised in a Zionist-controlled society, the thought was nearly impossible: the Jews lied?
The first thing that raised alarm bells was the discrepancy in the numbers. Then there was the replacing of the plaque and so much more. The lack of mass graves at Treblinka (watch: video); the removal of the photographs; the lie of the First World War; the exhaustive documentation of the holohoax; the extortion racket arising from such; the outright lies; the Red Cross totals, and on and on.
In fact, just read this:
"How One American Evolved into a "Holocaust Denier"
by Prof. Raymond Goodwin Sunday, 12 August 2007
How
does one go from believing the world is flat to accepting that it is
really round? How does one cast off decades of what is assumed to be
"gospel" and develop an entirely opposite world view? And how does a
layman resist and overcome the calumny associated with the acceptance
and espousing of a very different and unpopular viewpoint? After all,
many honest academics and others have lost their jobs and had their
livelihoods ruined because they dared to openly question the story.
Unlike all other historical events, this is one that has been deemed
"beyond question" and "beyond debate." Who has deemed it so and why?
THAT is what you need to know, that you might understand just why this
subject is so sacred and unapproachable by honest research.
The
following account is an attempt by one who dared be like Dorothy of the
Wizard of Oz, and decided to stymie the fear of a booming voice seeming
to come from the heavens and to pull back that curtain – and reveal
that the booming voice which had all the people in fear was not "God,"
but a little old white haired man with a megaphone! I present this
paper, actually first written in 1991 and only recently updated, in
hopes that our laymen will take up the cause for truth, and to show
that one does not have to be a man of letters or a "scholar" to
discover what turns out to be a simple truth. The enemy knows they can
pretty much control the scholars and their voices; what they fear is
the lay people starting to question their pronouncements, especially in
numbers. Hopefully the personal experience cited herein will be a
helpful guide and something with which you may "arm yourself" for
future questioning of the purveyors of a despicable, costly, and
cowardly myth.
Borrowing an acronym – FEAR
– I urge you to apply it to any account of the supposed extermination
campaign waged against the Jews by National Socialist Germany. False Evidence Appearing Real
is the hallmark of all the tales of "eyewitnesses" and "survivors" in
the Holocaust industry. For too long, these accusations and libel have
gone unchallenged and accepted at face value.
Come on, folks!
This is not an individual, but an entire nation, that has been charged
and convicted of mass murder, and has never been allowed to defend
itself. Put yourself, as an individual, in that position – you know you
are innocent, every piece of forensic, scientific, and demographic
evidence exonerates you – but you are not allowed to use it! You are
already judged as guilty before the trial even starts. That reminds
some of us Texans of old Judge Roy Bean, when asked by a captured
suspect, "Are you gonna give me a fair trial?" And Bean replied, "Yeah, we’ll give you a fair trial, then we’re gonna hang you."
As
you read this article, I hope you will think of and ask the questions
of your accuser that would be asked if you were on trial for such a
heinous crime. And do not accept anything but a legitimate answer in
return – no evasiveness, no emotional outbursts of name-calling. Every
one of the people who allege this crime of genocide should be forced to
back it up, and I do not mean with mislabeled and phony photographs,
and statements "from a friend of a friend whose brother in law said…"
Those who show a tattooed number as proof of extermination have only
shown you a tattoo that proves one thing – they have a tattoo!! In
other words, folks, hold these plaintiffs to the same judicial
standards as you would any other accuser! The burden of proof is on
THEM, and they have NOT given ONE SHRED of legitimate proof, excepting
that expressed in the above acronym – FEAR!!! They show a picture of a knife and say, "This knife killed 24 people!"
Remember – ALL they have shown you is a picture of a knife! Their
WORDS must be PROVEN to be true – otherwise, all their huffing and
puffing is merely that – HERESAY!!! Any good lawyer worth his salt
could tear them apart in a legitimate courtroom, where they are duly
sworn in and are forced to answer. The problem for those of us trying
to right this wrong is finding that legitimate courtroom. One does not
have much of a chance when the judge is part of the prosecution, and
knows his career is over if he dares allow an HONEST pursuit of
justice! Use the information herein to hold their feet to the fire –
and that includes the millions of duped "average Joe’s" who have bought
into this fiction. This is not a debate over history, people – this is
a WAR, and TRUTH has been the big loser so far – and the resultant
turmoil and suffering do not bode well for the very existence of
mankind.
I began my questioning and search for truth regarding
the much ballyhooed "Holocaust" in 1974. Like nearly every American, I
fully accepted at face value the claims of "survivors," the videos and
photos shown on television, and the very regular pronouncements from the
media, dais, and pulpit about the "horrible extermination campaign"
conducted against Jews by Hitler’s Germany . What spurred me to question
the details of this unspeakable crime? Reading a paper titled "Did Six
Million Really Die?", my work experience in a chemical plant and the
handling of hydrogen cyanide, and reading the accounts of "survivors"
from the post-war trials which essentially established the legend of
mass extermination that came to be termed the "Holocaust."
The
first thing I did as a seeker of truth was to get a definition of
"Holocaust," which was and is readily available in countless books on
the subject. That definition was/is described as "the planned and
activated extermination of members of the Jewish race, numbering some
six million, by National Socialist Germany primarily through the use of
Zyclon B ( a commercial preparation containing hydrogen cyanide) used
to disinfect clothing at the various labor camps during World War II."
With this definition forming the guidelines, I began my quest.
Those
who have challenged the "establishment" viewpoint are known as
"revisionists," and their position on the subject is: there was NO
attempt by National Socialist Germany to exterminate ANY ethnic group.
Revisionists agree that many deaths occurred in the camps due to
disease, starvation, and the horrid conditions of war, but "gas
chambers" for homicidal purposes were non-existent. Those who accept the
conventional view as true are designated as "exterminationists" by
revisionists.
What jumped at this researcher immediately upon
closer examination of the stories of extermination were the many
credible arguments against such a program, as advanced by revisionists.
The technical and physical impossibilities of the claims of alleged
gassings and cremations as espoused by "eyewitnesses" at the post-war
trials immediately fly in the face of scientific fact. Unfortunately,
such claims were NOT allowed to be questioned by the defense, nor those
witnesses allowed to be cross examined. Before an analysis of such
claims, a chronological background on the origins of "denial" is
necessary for a proper understanding of revisionist contentions.
In
1961, Professor Paul Rassinier of France became the first author to
refute the accuracy of claims of genocide in print. Francis P. Yockey’s
"Imperium," published in 1948, did cast doubt upon the claims, but did
not deal directly with the subject. Rassinier, a socialist and member
of the French resistance, had been captured and interned in the
concentration camps of Buchenwald and Dora. Liberated in 1945, he
returned to France as an invalid, and was shortly very puzzled, then
outraged, at the claims of "genocide" and gas chambers, particularly
regarding the two camps where he had been a prisoner. He had seen no
evidence of any such activities as an inmate there, and Rassinier
certainly had no love for the Germans. His initial work on the
extermination of the Jews, "The Lie of Ulysses," followed in 1964 by his
"The Drama of the European Jews," called into question the "Holocaust"
legend.
The year 1976 featured the appearance of a thorough and
well-documented revisionist treatise by Dr. Arthur R. Butz of
Northwestern University . "The Hoax of the 20th Century" dissected the
extermination claims from pre-war and post war population statistics;
the crucial role played by the Allied trials and their extreme
importance in implanting the legend were also addressed by Butz:
"…it
is a fact that without the evidence generated at these trials, there
would be no significant evidence that the program of killing Jews ever
existed at all…If the trials had not been held, a person claiming the
existence of an extermination program could not, if challenged, produce
any evidence for this save a few books…whose claims are just as
unsupported as his original claim. Thus the problem that had been
involved in deciding whether or not to try mass murder; unlike the
usual murder case, there was legitimate and very solid doubt that the
deed had been committed at all.
This
may surprise the reader who regards the tale of Jewish extermination
as a near certainty; such is simply not the case. There are many
considerations supporting this view and some are so simple that they
may surprise the reader even further. The simplest valid reason for
being skeptical about the extermination claim is also the simplest
conceivable reason; at the end of the war they were still there" (Butz, page 10).
Adding
credence to the claims made by Butz is the 1983 publication by Walter
N. Sanning, "The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry." This detailed
demographic study offers evidence that the vast majority of the
"exterminated" Jews did indeed survive, being absorbed primarily into
the Soviet Union, Palestine, and the United States . Professor Sanning
challenges the exterminationist school of thought:
"The
purpose of this analysis was not to investigate the content of truth
in the ‘Holocaust’ story, but to outline the extent and the direction
of the Jewish population movement before, during, and after World War
II. If the developments as traced here are in conflict with the taboos
of contemporary historians, it is THEIR (emphasis added) task to reconsider an untenable position."
In
his booklet, "The Holocaust – 120 Questions and Answers," Dr. Charles
E. Weber does a masterful job of provoking thought while keeping his
approach simple and plain-spoken. This 1983 publication addresses a
myriad of issues related to the Holocaust legend, and reminds the reader
from the outset that the funding available to those who disseminate
material from the exterminationist viewpoint far outweighs the minute
resources available to the revisionist (p.8). This is, of course, a
major factor in the relative obscurity of revisionist research and
conclusions on the issue.
One of the most definitive books on the
conduct of "war crimes" trials, "The Auschwitz Myth," by Dr. Wilhelm
Staglich, gives one insight into the show trial and political nature of
Allied courtroom procedures. This 1986 publication stresses the
ignoring of proper judicial standards and the appalling way in which
the search for TRUTH was impeded rather than furthered by the court.
Not many are aware that "eyewitnesses" were NOT allowed to be
cross-examined by the defense, nor were they ever subjected to
enforcement of the perjury oath. Additionally, "witnesses" traveled
from court to court making the same unchallenged claims, saying they
had been at each camp.
By October of 1990 the revisionist
assault on the legend had come full circle with the admission by Great
Britain’s leading historian and authority on World War II, David
Irving, that he was now convinced of the fraudulent nature of the
entire extermination thesis ("Battleship Auschwitz ," pp. 498-499), and
would include a statement to this effect in new editions of his
previously published books.
TECHNICAL ASPECTS
According
to revisionist investigation, NONE of the alleged "gas chambers" had
ventilation or exhaust systems capable of handling the gassing of
inmates. The square footage in ALL of the "chambers" would allow for a
hypothetical total of 123,976 gassings in ALL the years of the supposed
"genocide" program (The Leuchter Report, p. 14). In September of 1989,
the Russians released the Auschwitz death books (the Germans were
meticulous record keepers), which show a death toll of 74,000 at that
camp from ALL CAUSES ( Irving , p. 500). Confessions from Germans,
obtained by TORTURE, "eyewitness" testimony, and exterminationist
historians put the number gassed at Auschwitz alone at 4 million. This
massive contradiction deserves further examination in the interest of
historical truth. This figure has now been revised downward, to just
over a million, thanks to the fear of revisionist discoveries and
publishings. Notably, however, that reduction did nothing regarding the
claim of six-million dead!!
On August 19, 1960, the director of
the prestigious Institute for Contemporary History in Munich, Dr.
Martin Broszat, announced to his amazed countrymen that there had NEVER
been a "gas chamber" in the entirety of the German Reich, but only a
few in other places, namely in occupied Poland (Robert Faurrison, "The
Problem of the Gas Chambers," pp. 107-108). This announcement flew in
the face of those who swore to mass killings in German camps, but that
was never brought up, of course!
Broszat has NEVER provided an
explanation for this contention. Professor Robert Faurrison of France
asks: 1. How does Dr. Broszat know that the "gas chambers" in the Old
Reich were frauds? 2. How does he know that the "gas chambers" in
Poland are genuine? 3. Why do the proofs and certainties and eyewitness
accounts concerning the concentration camps in the west suddenly have
no value, while these SAME criteria still remain true for the camps in
Poland (p. 108)? Think about those questions!!
As the
exterminationists themselves have since abandoned the claims of the use
of gas chambers in Germany proper, primary attention will now be
devoted to the main camps in Poland, which would be Majdanek and
Auschwitz-Birkenau. Pertinent to this, however, is the confession
regarding the German camp of Bergen-Belsen .
Two of the pillars
upon which rest the claims of the exterminationist historians and the
"survivors" and "eyewitnesses" are the confessions of Kurt Gerstein and
Rudolf Hoess. Gerstein, one-time commandant of Bergen-Belsen, states
in his confession that 700 to 800 people went into each of the four
chambers each time the gassings took place. The size of each room
varies slightly, but worked out in terms of occupant per square meter
(approximately a square 3 feet by 3 feet), and according to those
"eyewitnesses," those rooms would have had a minimum of 30 to a maximum
of 40 individuals in each square meter (Felderer, p. 170). I ask you,
dear reader, to draw on your floor or the ground, a square of 3 feet by
3 feet. Then imagine just how many people you could cram into that
square. Thirty? Forty? I don’t think so!! Revisionist Ditlieb Felderer
concludes, "In spite of all the absurdities, impossibilities, erroneous
and contradictory figures, the ‘Gerstein Statement" continues to
maintain its supremacy in Exterminationist lore. Perhaps this is just
as well, from a cynical Revisionist viewpoint, for few things could
better illustrate the mythical nature of the ‘Holocaust’ than this very
item" (Felderer, p.172).
Rudolf Hoess, one of three successive
commanding officers at Auschwitz, was the only one to leave a
confession. His description of the actual gassing procedures is
remarkably short and vague, just as all other "eyewitness" accounts are
vague, brief, and full of contradictions on many points. As described
by Hoess: one-half hour after having released the gas, the Germans
would open the door and turn on the fan, and immediately begin to
remove the bodies. Hoess added that the crew in charge would remove the
2000 (!) bodies and begin transporting them to the crematory ovens
while eating and smoking (quoted in Faurrison, "The Mechanics…", p.24).
This confession implies that it is possible to enter an area saturated
with hydrogen cyanide (HCN, Zyclon B) while taking no precautions for
self-protection, and bare-handedly grasp 2000 cadavers contaminated
with the deadly gas. The air pockets between the bodies heaped on top
of one another would have been filled with HCN.
This
"confession" lacks plausibility and even common sense (many "survivors"
and "eyewitnesses" swore to the SAME impossibility in court), and is
in accord with revisionist claims that it is a fabrication extracted by
torture. Yet, testimony by these claimants at Nuremberg and other
post-war trials was readily accepted into the record, not allowed to be
challenged, and believed as "gospel" by Allied judges anxious to do
their duty for "humanity." And countless German military personnel, not
guilty of any such crime, were executed on the basis of these claims
by "survivors" that were NOT allowed to be questioned or
cross-examined.
It was this particular part of my reading that
drew me to examine and challenge those claims. I was an employee of
E.I. DuPont at that time, and worked in a huge chemical plant, having
experience working around HCN. Allow me to cite the DuPont Company
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) on hydrogen cyanide (the primary
element of Zyclon B), updated January 14, 1991. HCN is described as
unstable with heat and extremely flammable. It is a fast acting poison
and could be fatal if inhaled, swallowed, or absorbed through the skin
(remember the "eyewitness" accounts of SS men "smoking and eating,"
wearing NO protective equipment, while callously dragging gassed Jews
out by the hair). The MSDS adds that in most cases cyanide poisoning
causes a deceptively healthy pink to red skin color, and that skin
permeation can occur in amounts capable of producing systemic toxicity.
The user is cautioned to use the gas only in closed systems and with
ventilation adequate to keep vapor concentrations below exposure
limits. Warnings are given to evacuate the area immediately if HCN
fumes are detected, and to don protective clothing before re-entry. The
MINIMUM personal protective equipment recommended is goggles and
rubber gloves, and the user should have at hand rubber suits and boots, a
full-body chemical suit, and a self-contained breathing air supply.
DuPont also warns that with eye or skin contact, one should immediately
flush the eyes with plenty of water, remove contaminated clothing,
including shoes, and wash the skin. Skin absorption can occur from
cyanide dust, solutions, or HCN vapor (MSDS, pp. 3-10).
Therefore,
the abundance of technical and physical impossibilities inherent in
the confessions becomes apparent upon examination of the sites and the
dimensions of the so-called gas chambers. The technical problems
inherent in ANY plan to gas millions of people would have necessitated
meetings of experts and the issuance of plans, instructions, and safety
equipment. NO EVIDENCE that ANY of this was ever done by the National
Socialist government has ever been found (Faurisson, "The Mechanics…"
p.29). Remember too, that passes would NOT have been granted to Germans
in the camps, nor their families allowed to visit; prisoners who had
served their sentences would not have been released or allowed to return
to their respective countries, or the "extermination program" would
have been revealed to the whole world!
Faurrison concludes his
article with what he regards as THE criteria of FALSE EVIDENCE regarding
the gas chambers. He avers that ALL of the statements, as vague and
inconsistent as they may be, AGREE on ONE thing: the crew responsible
for removing the bodies entered the site either "immediately" or "a few
moments" after the deaths of the victims. Calling this a physical
impossibility, he states:
"I
contend that this point alone constitutes the cornerstone of the false
evidence, because this is a physical impossibility. If you encounter a
person who believes in the existence of the ‘gas chambers,’ ask him how,
in his opinion, the thousands of cadavers were removed to make room
for the next batch (The Mechanics…, p.30)."
Perhaps the
most severe blow to the Extermination Thesis was delivered in 1988 with
the publication of "The Leuchter Report: The End of a Myth." The
author’s treatise is a report on the technical aspects of the alleged
execution chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek , Poland, using
comparisons with American prison gas chamber designs and operations.
In
states that use lethal gas for capital punishment, stringent rules and
procedures must be met. All lighting and electrical hardware must be
explosion-proof (NONE of the rooms designated as "gas chambers" had this
feature). If you come home in the evening and open your home and smell
gas, the one thing you know not to do is flip a light switch. The
spark can cause an explosion. The chamber is operated under a vacuum so
that any leak would be inward. An eminent authority on capital
executions, Leuchter states that many complicated problems must be
considered in the design of an execution gas chamber. A mistake may,
and probably will, cause death or injury to anyone OUTSIDE the chamber
(Leuchter, p.6). This expert says that an area of NINE square feet is
the MINIMUM required for gas circulation around the occupant of any gas
chamber. As the floor area for Auschwitz Krema 1 "gas chamber" is 844
square feet, allowance for gas circulation means that a maximum of 94
people could fit into this room at one time for execution. "Eyewitness
testimony" places 600 people at a time in this room (Leuchter, p.11).
Remember – NO questioning or cross-examining was allowed in the courts!
How would YOU, as the accused, feel about YOUR defense attorneys being
so handicapped, with your life on the line?
The tourist
attractions exhibited to the public as "gas chambers" in all the camps
examined by Leuchter have NO gasketed doors or windows, and very few
have vents; the inside walls of the structures are not sealed to
prevent leakage or absorption of the gas, so that the exposed, porous
brick and mortar would accumulate HCN and be dangerous to humans for
several years. The fact that these rooms identified as "gas chambers"
are located right next to the crematories also would make them a prime
source for explosion and fire. Very poor planning by those evil
Germans, indeed!
Leuchter found that Krema 1 has floor drains
connected to the main sewer of the camp. This would allow the
heavier-than-air deadly HCN to get into every building at the facility,
resulting in the deaths of even the Germans. The "gas chambers" here,
as in ALL the camps, are too small to contain the numbers claimed. The
doors to these rooms all open INWARD (another poor design consideration
by those supposedly so efficient in mass slaughter; it would be quite
difficult to push such a door open against the piles of bodies after a
gassing). Also, enough LEAKAGE of the deadly gas would have occurred in
ALL of the gas chambers to have killed the administering technicians
(Leuchter, p.9).
Leuchter’s strongest forensic evidence is the
samples of brick, mortar, concrete, and sediment taken by his team from
the three Polish camps. HCN and its compounds are very residual – they
hang around for decades! Leuchter took 31 samples at the alleged gas
chambers, and a control sample was taken from delousing facility number
one at Birkenau. The control sample, from the delousing chamber where
clothing was treated to rid it of disease-causing lice, showed a very
heavy cyanide content of 1050 milligrams per kilogram of brick. This is
consistent with the use of Zyclon B as a delousing agent in that
chamber. However, of the other 31 samples, from the supposed gas
chambers, 17 had NO measurable trace of HCN, and the other 14 were all
under 8 milligrams – consistent with those locations having been
deloused at some time. This scientific analysis supports the evidence
that these facilities could NOT have been execution gas chambers. Of
course, "eyewitness testimony" by those INCAPABLE of LYING was
responsible for the death sentences given German camp personnel there
as well as the camps in Germany proper, where the non-existence of
homicidal gas chambers has been admitted even by the exterminationists.
No charges of perjury, or suggestions of redress to the survivors of
the wrongly and vindictively executed Germans, have ever been proffered
by the moralistic proponents of the Extermination thesis.
Investigation
of the CREMATIONS of the alleged gassing victims evinces the same
degree of impossibility and contradiction. I took a tour of a modern
crematory near my home city, interviewed the experienced technician,
and learned what it takes to dispose of ONE body. I asked not only how
much time, how much fuel, what temperature, and how much residue is
left, but the possibility of multiple cremations in one oven. Rarely
considered is the fact that the oven MUST undergo a cooling down period
before the ashes and bits of bone remaining may be removed.
Those
remnants fill a normal size shoe box. What I learned form this
personal research was that NONE of the descriptions in the accusations
made by "survivors" was even remotely possible except in their own
minds. Four million shoe-boxes of ashes would have made quite a mound
at Auschwitz . Where is it? The 60 pounds of coal/coke used by the
Germans to cremate one body ALSO leaves residue – and if one multiplies
that 60 pounds by the supposed 4 million bodies – WHERE did Germany
get the 240 million pounds of coal, and HOW did they get it to
Auschwitz ? As to the TIME required to cremate all those bodies (4 hours
for each) – Leuchter says (p.10) that the capability of all the ovens
at the entirety of Auschwitz could realistically cremate 207 bodies in
24 hours.
IF there were 4 million, and the 69 crematoria there
worked around the clock with no shut down time for cleaning (an
impossibility), the Germans would have still been cremating bodies until
something like June of 1972!!! Please, please, Mr. "Survivor", Mr.
"Eyewitness," explain this! Oh – you say that the bodies were
mass-cremated, in that well-cited 50-foot long, 10-foot deep pit the
awful Germans dug. FACTS: Auschwitz was built on swamp-like land; the
water table there is 4 feet deep. That’s right – once you reach that
depth, WATER begins to seep into the hole you are digging. Ten foot deep
trench? Sure!! Additionally – what fuel did they use in that pit? It
doesn’t matter – a high-enough temperature to cremate a human body
CANNOT be reached in an open pit!! Once again, you accusers – EXPLAIN
this!! Where are the tons of incomplete cremation remains?
I
distinctly remember watching another of the myriad of "specials" on the
"Holocaust" made in 1985, titled "A Painful Reminder." This was aired
on the Discovery Channel out of Houston , and included the standard
claims of "gassings" made by the interviewed "survivors." It was
CLEARLY stated on this program that 279,000 bodies per MONTH (over
9,000 per day) were being cremated there in a continuous,
round-the-clock operation. These phony "witnesses" were trying to make
the numbers fit the story. Remember – German military and concentration
camp personnel were EXECUTED on the basis of such unquestioned and
unchallenged testimony.
Leuchter’s own conclusion about his forensic examination there:
"After
reviewing all of the material and inspecting all the sites at
Auschwitz , Birkenau, and Majdanek, your author finds the evidence
overwhelming. There were no execution gas chambers at any of these
locations. It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the
alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have been, or
now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas
chambers."
Imagine what such testimony, had it been
allowed at the show trials after the war, would have done to these
witnesses for hire who traveled from court to court to spout the same
LIES. They knew, of course, that challenging their lies would not be
allowed, nor would any cross-examination by the defense. They know this
today, as well, and still make those claims before Americans in
schoolrooms and elsewhere.
Consideration must be given to the
numbers game played by the exterminationists and Jews as well. In brief
– according to the study by Professor Sanning as well as information
from the Encyclopedia Britannica, the total number of Jews that were
ever under the expansion of the German military was 4 million. Today,
you have at least 3.7 million drawing reparations as "survivors" and
"victims." Please, I may not be a math major, but somehow I just cannot
get six million dead Jews out of that, nor even a half a million.
Why
the paradoxical reaction of Jews to revisionist contentions that Jews
were not the victims of extermination, but survived the war? One would
think that debunking of the myths would elicit a joyful response,
especially from those who have believed for decades that their people
were the victims of genocide. Consider these three probable reasons:
(1) the Holocaust is a HUGE financial business with obscene profits and
enormous amounts of gullible sympathy; (2) the Palestinian issue; and
(3) the immense power and influence exercised by Zionists and other
Jews upon the governments and media of the world, especially upon
American foreign and domestic policy.
Most Americans are unaware
of the billions paid to individual Jews as well as to Israel , a
nation that did not even exist at the time of the alleged "genocide."
The amount paid yearly to all these "victims" is based upon the now
legendary "six million" figure, and as these reparations are STILL
ongoing, any reduction in that number would be intolerable to the
recipients of such largesse.
In essence, should revisionist
findings be accurate and accepted as such, the goose that lays these
golden eggs for Jewish coffers would disappear!! And those folks who
have been forced to bear the guilt and pay this extortion for all these
decades just might be a little upset over what have been done to them.
Israel
was established in 1948 due in large part to the overwhelming SYMPATHY
generated by these ridiculous accusations of genocide. The Zionists
were given the land of the Palestinians by the British as a homeland
for the Jewish state. The Palestinians thus became as victimized as the
Germans by this massive LIE, as they have been a homeless, tortured
people since then. They are indeed the REAL victims of not just the
repressive Zionists, but an uninformed and misinformed world that does
not want to hear of their grief and suffering – a world with little
sympathy toward righting a decades old injustice.
As the United
States government and all facets of the media played the key role in
establishing the legend of genocide, this is why both institutions turn
their backs upon revisionist findings. And it is also why they ignore
attacks upon revisionists and Palestinians alike. Both also continue an
ever-increasing effort to propagate the Extermination thesis. Several
states have made "holocaust education" mandatory in their schools; US
taxpayer funds are used to fund "Holocaust" museums and other tributes.
No political lobby in the United States plays a more influential role
in electing or defeating political candidates as do Jewish political
action committees.
These are all factors in maintaining the
"Holocaust" legend and also explain the silence of politicians on the
subject. Jewish organizations are constantly pressuring all levels of
government to adopt legislation that makes questioning or doubting the
Holocaust a crime punishable by heavy fine and imprisonment. Their
efforts have been successful in many foreign countries and are making
headway here, in spite of our supposed Constitutional protection.
Why
would key members of the US government have participated for so many
years in perpetuating and supporting the legend? Besides
self-aggrandizement, of course, obliteration by contrast is the likely
reason. Without the genocide claim to use against Germany , several
aspects of the initiation and conduct of the war by the Roosevelt
administration would have not only come into question but caused much
popular unrest in this country. The dubious story of the "surprise"
attack on Pearl Harbor, the cover up of the Soviet massacre of the
Polish officer corps at Katyn (and blaming it on the Germans), Operation
Keelhaul, the barbaric saturation bombings of non-military targets,
and the orgy of rape and pillage engaged in by the Allies and
resistance forces, could most justifiably be labeled "war crimes." But
with the genocide claim against the Germans, all of these actions, as
well as the decision by FDR, Churchill, and Stalin before the end of
the war to divide Germany and Europe with the Soviets, are "justified."
After all, any nation that would conduct genocide, especially against
Jews, deserves every form of destruction and punishment it got!!
The
veracity of revisionist claims may only be properly evaluated if they
receive a hearing. But such a hearing is vociferously opposed by Jews
and their lackeys in government and media. Their only answer to our
research is personal attacks, including beatings (Faurrison), destroying
livelihoods (Leuchter, Zundel, and others), and name-calling. One has
to wonder – if revisionists are indeed "flat-earth" fools, and the Jews
and exterminationists are holding all the aces – of WHAT are they
afraid?
Personal Conclusions
If
this author comes across as angry about this entire issue, that is
because I am certainly angry! After examining the issue from more than
one side, seeing the forensic and scientific evidence offered by the
revisionists, and in essence giving a hearing that was NOT allowed at
the shameful post-war courts, I easily came to the conclusion that this
whole "Holocaust" is nothing more than a "HOLO-HOAX," and deserves to
be exposed for what it has been all along – an extortion crime of the
worst degree. I even learned in my search that this SAME claim of
genocide and of millions dead was floated by the Zionists after World
War 1, but it was immediately recognized for the lie that it was, and
given short shrift. I am also angry about the personal attacks upon
legitimate scholars who question this historical non-event, the
beatings, destruction of property, and the impunity with which such
thugs operate in MY country. The kowtowing by politicians, media people,
clergy, and academia to these arrogant FRAUDS is a disgrace. I, for
one, have put my foot down.
No more unchallenged fairy tales by "survivors" as long as I am able to speak out!
If
your community is like mine, it is visited on occasion by another of
the millions of "holocaust survivors," who speak in our churches and
our schools about the suffering they endured at the hands of those evil
Germans, while the world stood by and did nothing! I do not know about
you, but I am way past being tired of their totally baseless whining,
lies, and extortion. Certainly, a number of Jews did suffer the
depredations of war – but no more than any other peoples. Those
responsible for the executions and extortion payments in the form of
reparations should be made to face the music of perjury trials at the
very minimum. When they cry that they lost their entire family – MANY
people lost their entire families in that war, and Jews deserve no more
or no less sympathy than anyone else. I’ll admit, however, that it is
quite difficult to feel sympathy for the legions of lying vampires who
rake in tons of extortion money off the labor of falsely accused people
every year. The German nation should be exonerated of this despicably
assigned GUILT, and the historical record set straight. It is past time
to get in the faces of these LIARS, and put them to the test with
honest questioning. They will not engage in debate, unless they can
turn the debate AWAY from the intellectual and logical to the EMOTIONAL
– which they will do every time! They know that in any debate between
logic and emotion, logic loses every time! Thus their personal attacks
upon those who question them, and the inevitable name calling – Nazi,
anti-Semite, and others. To those who push and support this Holocaust
fairy tale, I say, IF it is an historical event, then it is as subject
to dissection and discussion as any other historical event. IF, on the
other hand, it is a religion – which is certainly what its adherents
have made of it over the decades – then get it out of our schools!!
Here’s another confession from this confirmed "Holocaust" denier -
"sticks and stones…."
Bibliography
Butz, Arthur R.: The Hoax of the 20th Century. Richmond , Surrey , England : Historical Review Press, 1976
DuPont Material Safety Data Sheet (Hydrogen Cyanide): Hazardous Materials Manual, 1991 Ed.
Faurrison, Robert: "The Mechanics of Gassing." Journal of Historical Review, 1.1 (1980), pp. 23-30
Faurrison, Robert: "The Problem of the ‘Gas Chambers’." Journal of Historical Review, 1.2 (1980), p.1.
Felderer, Ditlieb: " Auschwitz Notebook." Journal of Historical Review, 1.2 (1980), pp. 169-172
Irving, David: "Battleship Auschwitz ." Journal of Historical Review, 10.4 (1990), pp.491-508
Leuchter, Fred A.: The Leuchter Report: The End of a Myth, Toronto : Samisdat Publishers, Ltd., 1988
Sanning, Walter N.: The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry. Torrance , Ca.: Institute for Historical Review, 1983.
Staglich,
Dr. Wilhelm: The Auschwitz Myth, English translation from the German
original, Der Auschwitz Mythos. Torrance , Ca. : Institute for
Historical Review, 1986
Weber, Dr. Charles E.: "The Holocaust – 120 Questions and answers." Torrance , Ca.: Institute for Historical Review, 1983
Source: ZioPedia.org
More: The Long Litany of Jewish Lies
The scale of lies is not only enormous, it is saddening.
Update: Sunday Globe Insults: Jews Were Tory Traitors
