UPDATE:
"Tuesday, June 12, 2012
I for one am extremely angry that we are not being told the truth about the situation at the Daichii nuclear power station at Fukushima Japan. We all know by now about the radioactive fish that were caught off the coast of California, and we are also aware of the radioactive debris that is now washing ashore on the Pacific coast of both Canada and the United States. But there has been few reports coming forward that give a great summary of the situation, and explain the situation in a way that more people can understand, until now....
The fact is again that we have been lied to by our own governments and media, which have been working at trying to create the idea in people that there is nothing to worry about with the situation at Fukushima... The truth is far different....
I want to present the following video, entitled: "Fukushima Update 6-9-2012" in which Dr. Conrad Miller gives an excellent detailed summary of the present situation concerning the ongoing Fukushima nuclear disaster....
--MORE w/ MUST-SEE VIDEO--"
What he was talking about, and what a concerned American is exposed to when he sits down at the table in the morning and cracks open his Boston Globe with his morning coffee:
"Japan’s leader wants nuclear plants restarted; Says economy at risk without nuclear power" by Martin Fackler | new york times, June 09, 2012
TOKYO - In a blunt appeal on national television, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda asked for his nation’s support Friday in restarting one of Japan’s idled nuclear plants, saying the loss of energy could bring blackouts and economic chaos.
Can you impeach him for insanity in Japan?
In the 10-minute speech, Noda took his case directly to the Japanese people, explaining why he wants to resume operation of at least some of Japan’s 50 commercial reactors, which have all been idled since last year’s nuclear accident in Fukushima....
Noda spoke in stark terms, saying he had concluded that
Japan could not maintain its current living standards without nuclear
power. Responding to the commonly heard argument here that Japan is
currently getting along fine without the plants, he said conservation
measures would not be enough in the approaching summer months to
overcome the loss of the nation’s nuclear plants....
Oh, if only the world had invested the trillions upon trillions upon trillions of dollars in developing solar and other sustainable forms of energy instead of wasting it on war profiteers and Wall Street banks.
Oh, if only the world had invested the trillions upon trillions upon trillions of dollars in developing solar and other sustainable forms of energy instead of wasting it on war profiteers and Wall Street banks.
Well, if the world had invested trillio.... oh, right.
Such appeals are unusual in Japan’s often colorless political world, and Noda’s was seen here as recognition of how the restart issue has polarized his nation.
Yeah, most are against it, leadership is for it.
While many Japanese are now deeply distrustful of their government’s ability to oversee the politically powerful nuclear industry, others worry that power shortages could cost jobs and accelerate the nation’s industrial decline.
Is there a citizen anywhere on this planet who IS NOT?
For weeks, his government has been trying to convince skeptical local leaders to allow a restart of the Ohi plant, which provides power to the heavily urbanized Kansai region, including the cities of Osaka and Kyoto. He has said he wants to restart the Ohi plant first because Kansai faces the most severe potential electricity shortages in Japan during the steamy summer, when air conditioner use surges.
The threat of rolling blackouts seems to have persuaded local leaders to accept at least a temporary restart of the Ohi plant. However, the mayor of Osaka, Toru Hashimoto, who led local opposition, has said he may ask that the plant be turned off again in September, saying he is against a permanent restart until Japan revamps its nuclear oversight.
“Restarting the Ohi plant will solve the problem for now, but it still leaves open the question of what happens in September,’’ said Hiroshi Tasaka, a nuclear policy specialist at Tokyo’s Tama University who advised the previous prime minister, Naoto Kan. “There may be a political showdown if Prime Minister Noda tries to keep the plant on, or restarts other plants, without strengthening regulatory oversight.’’
In his speech, Noda sought to address some of those concerns by explaining measures his government was taking to avoid a repeat of last year’s accident, which was caused when a huge earthquake and tsunami knocked out cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, resulting in meltdowns in three reactors.
Is he guaranteeing an earthquake or tsunami won't happen?
The main step, he said, was overhauling Japan’s current regulatory oversight, which he admitted had failed to prevent the Fukushima accident. He said his government was moving as quickly as possible to create an independent new nuclear regulatory agency. He was responding to criticism that the current watchdog, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, part of the Ministry of Economics, Trade and Industry, is charged with promoting the nuclear industry.
--more--"
The public's reaction:
"The Japanese public has been deeply distrustful since last year’s nuclear disaster and revelations that government officials played down the risks of the meltdown. Polls indicate most voters do not believe it is safe to turn the plants back on, despite the consequences for the economy....
--more--"