"Health officials in Britain have a message: Daffodils can make you ill. Authorities have asked supermarkets to keep flowers far from fruit and vegetables, in case customers mistake poisonous blooms for food. Public Health England says it has had cases of consumers mistaking daffodil bulbs for onions and the stems for a Chinese vegetable (AP)."
More frail flowers in Britain that will also make you ill:
"Report raps English town on child sex abuse" New York Times February 05, 2015
LONDON — The British government severely criticized legislators in the northern English town of Rotherham on Wednesday for a culture of “complete denial” that led to a long-running sexual abuse ring involving the abuse of up to 1,400 children from 1997 to 2013.
A report about the scandal by a senior official at Britain’s Department for Communities and Local Government found a deep-rooted culture of coverups and bullying, and grounds for possible criminal indictments.
The Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council leader, Paul Lakin, has resigned and the council’s Cabinet is set to resign. The police and crime commissioner of South Yorkshire, Shaun Wright, had already stepped down over the scandal.
--more--"
Related: The Rotten in Rotherham
So is the coverage of this elite pedophile ring from the propaganda pre$$ that represents that cla$$ of people. It's not like the names are not known or anything. It's a list of all the people you are supposed to admire and respect, according to the propaganda pre$$.
What one realizes after a while is those perversions are what is used to blackmail and control leaders.
And the authorities had to know:
"UK court puts limit on Internet monitoring" by Mark Scott, New York Times February 07, 2015
LONDON — The court that oversees intelligence agencies in Britain ruled Friday that the electronic mass surveillance of cellphone and other online communications data had been conducted unlawfully.
The decision, the first time the court has ruled against the British intelligence services since the tribunal was created in 2000, relates to information that was shared between British security agencies and the US National Security Agency before December 2014.
I think even they are getting sick of the tyranny based on fraud and lies.
Although privacy campaigners claimed the decision as a victory, many experts said the British and US intelligence agencies would continue to share information obtained with electronic surveillance, even if they had to slightly alter their techniques to comply with human rights law.
Ever hear of an UNLAWFUL GOVERNMENTS, because you are looking at them.
They will just GO AROUND the LAW and KEEP DOING WHAT THEY ARE DOING!
And you WONDER WHY I DON'T BELIEVE a F***ING WORD from them?
“It’s a real landmark case,” said Ian Brown, a professor of information security and privacy at the University of Oxford. “This will not stop intelligence agencies from sharing information. But it’s unlikely they will be able to conduct large-scale uncontrolled intelligence activities without more oversight.”
Oversight from who?
During the past decade, British and US intelligence agencies have used a program known as Prism, first revealed by former NSA contractor Edward J. Snowden, and others like it to gain access to individuals’ Internet communications without their knowledge.
See: Seeing Through the PRISM of Obama's Spying Program
They even trapped your conversations when they said they were not.
Want a look at your profile?
The British court found, however, that Government Communications Headquarters had unlawfully retrieved information gathered from US surveillance programs before the end of 2014.
That's how each country gets around domestic spying laws: have the other guy do it, and then have them give you the information.
And we are still expected to believe in the altruism of the power-mad f***s.
--more--"
NDU:
"Think pink? UK campaign bus to draw women voters backfires
LONDON (AP) -- Britain's Labour Party has launched an election campaign targeting women voters but its chosen vehicle, a bright pink bus, has backfired even before it hit the road.
The bus's color has drawn scorn and ridicule, with some calling it patronizing and sexist. Critics on Twitter compared it to a Barbie van or a bachelorette party limo.
The opposition party, which says it will highlight policies on issues such as childcare and domestic violence, hopes the bus will promote its "woman to woman" campaign and draw millions of women who didn't vote in the last election.
Reacting to the backlash Wednesday, Labour's deputy leader Harriet Harman said the idea was to make the bus "look conspicuous," not patronizing. "Well it doesn't have big eyelashes on the front," she added."
It's all a joke, coverage included. That's why my hits are plummeting. This blog sucks, and the only explanation is the material.
