Sunday, January 6, 2013

Sunday Globe Special: Libyan Attack Led to Accelerated AmeriKan Occupation of Africa

"Libyan attack exposes shortcomings in military command; Pentagon group in region needed outside troops" by Eric Schmitt and Michael R. Gordon  |  New York Times, November 04, 2012

WASHINGTON — The assault, on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, has exposed shortcomings in the Obama administration’s ability to secure diplomatic missions and act on intelligence warnings.

Hmmmmmm. 

Related(?)The President Who Lost Afghanistan

And now he's lost Libya. 

But this previously undisclosed episode, described by several US officials, points to a limitation in the capabilities of the American military command responsible for Africa, including the North African countries swept up in the Arab Spring.

Africa Command, established in 2007 as the Pentagon’s newest four-star regional headquarters, did not have on hand what every other regional combatant command has: its own force with the ability to respond rapidly to emergencies — a Commanders’ In-Extremis Force.

Hmmmm, the Libyan attack "indirectly" benefited who?

Also see: Globe Xmas Gift: AmeriKa to Occupy Africa

Looks like a return to me.

To respond to the Benghazi attack, the Africa Command had to borrow the Commanders’ In-Extremis Force of the European Command, because its own force is still in training. It also had no AC-130 gunships or armed drones readily available that night.

No drones? I suppose that would be a first -- not that they really could have done anything. What were they going to do, drop a missile on the embassy and blame CIA-Duh?

As officials in the White House and Pentagon scrambled to respond to the torrent of reports pouring out from Libya — with Stevens missing and officials worried that he might have been taken hostage — they also took the extraordinary step of sending the elite Delta Force, with its own helicopters and ground vehicles, from its base at Fort Bragg, N.C., to Sicily. Those troops also arrived too late.

‘‘The fact of the matter is these forces were not in place until after the attacks were over,’’ a Pentagon spokesman, George Little, told reporters on Friday. ‘‘We did respond. The secretary ordered forces to move. They simply were not able to arrive in time.’’

At the heart of the issue is the Africa Command, which was spun off from the European Command. At the time it was established, the Pentagon thought it would be mostly devoted to training African troops and building military ties with African nations.

Because of African sensitivities about an overt US military presence in the region, the command’s headquarters was established near Stuttgart, Germany.

While the other regional commands, including the Pacific Command and the Central Command, responsible for the Middle East and South Asia, have their own specialized quick-reaction forces, the Africa Command has had to borrow the European Command’s force when trouble has struck on the continent....

The black man (and woman) has always had to sit in the back of the bus, haven't they? Don't even get their own specialized US commandos to raid them.

Some Pentagon officials said it was unrealistic to think a quick-reaction force could have been sent in time even if the African Command had one ready to act at Sigonella when the Benghazi attack unfolded, and asserted that such a small force might not have even been effective or the best means to protect an embassy....

Yeah, it's the horse out of the barn thing. 

The Africa Command is led by General Carter F. Ham, an infantryman who commanded a brigade in Mosul during the Iraq war and took charge of the headquarters last year, just before American, British, and French air power helped topple Moammar Khadafy in Libya.

On day of the attacks on the mission and a nearby annex in Benghazi, Ham and other regional commanders were in Washington for a series of long-planned meetings....

Hmmmmmmmm. 

--more--"