"Boston publisher grapples with ‘Mein Kampf’ profits" by Malcolm Gay Globe Staff May 01, 2016
What do you do with the devil’s lucre?
That’s the question Boston-based publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt has been grappling with for more than 80 years, as it has quietly disbursed the royalties and profits from “Mein Kampf,” the infamous screed Adolf Hitler composed while in prison following the failed beer hall putsch of 1923.
It's the most dangerous book ever written.
For the past 16 years, the publisher, which first printed the book in the United States in 1933, has addressed the question by donating hundreds of thousands of dollars in proceeds from its sale to groups such as the Anti-Defamation League, the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, and Facing History and Ourselves — specialized organizations that have used the funds as a sort of direct moral equalizer, putting them toward Holocaust education or programs that combat anti-Semitism.
Recently, however, the company has quietly decided to change course, shifting its grant-making focus from programs explicitly related to Holocaust awareness and Jewish education to those that promote tolerance more generally. This delicate pivot has become even more complicated locally, as the publishing house has sought to focus the book’s proceeds in Boston, inviting a handful of area institutions to propose projects for funding. At least one — Boston Children’s Museum — has said no, discomfited by the Hitler connection.
“It just did not feel in the end like a good fit,” said Carole Charnow, the museum’s president and CEO. “This was not a rational decision.”
For Houghton Mifflin, the shift in approach is a bid to diversify and deepen the effect of the book proceeds, doing good from the legacy of evil.
“Our goal was to just go a little bigger and broader with organizations that were working within the public sphere at large,” said Andrew Russell, director of corporate social responsibility for Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. “We felt like we had the opportunity to make a broader impact here in Boston.”
The shift to more general antidiscrimination projects has caused concern among some Jewish leaders, who say the funds, given the author’s epochal crimes against humanity, should be devoted to the issue of genocide.
“Holocaust education and Holocaust awareness should be at the top of the list for these profits,” said Robert Trestan, director of the Anti-Defamation League’s New England regional office. “Number two would be anti-bias education.”
Trestan, who said his group received a three-year, $100,000 grant in 2001 from the publishing house, said he was unaware of the firm’s shift in focus until he was contacted by a reporter.
“There are millions of nonprofits in the US,” he said. “There are thousands in Massachusetts. That shouldn’t automatically qualify you for the use of these funds.”
Oddly, this is reminiscent of the recent events in Newton and they are on the other side of it now.
What one is struck by, and what many much more strident than I have noted, is the Zionist inclination in thinking its OUR MONEY! From the writers of all our history in textbooks (which curiously omit the name Rothschild).
The fact that it comes from a group that is supremacist, separatist, and exclusionary pales only next to the juxtaposition of the same group pushing the diversity agenda (while driving division at the same time; nice trick).
As I outlined my commentary to this issue and series of articles, it occurred to me that my criticism has nothing to do with antisemitism (btw, Palestinians also Semites) or Jewishness at all. It simply has to do with the idea of entitlement by a self-appointed group of self-privileged people. They could be purple aliens from the galaxy of Nebulax for all I care; it's the attitude that's the turn-off.
Fast forwarding 70 years, I haven't even touched upon the transgressions and atrocities of the USrael Empire, which some would compare to the, you know. One thing is clear; more refugees now than in the last WW.
Russell declined to say how many grants the publisher planned to give in this latest round. He also declined to give a dollar amount for the grants. He stressed, however, that the company’s new focus was neither permanent nor exclusive.
“We feel that giving funds to cultural and educational organizations that reach a broad audience can effectively influence the way our society tackles issues of cultural awareness, bias, and discrimination,” Russell said. “It is also important to note that we are not ruling out funding programs that address Holocaust education or combat anti-Semitism, but again, [we are] looking to partner with organizations on programs that can facilitate a larger conversation.”
That larger conversation hasn’t always gone smoothly, as some area cultural leaders have struggled with how — and whether — they can accept profits from a book many view as a blueprint for the methodical slaughter of about 6 million Jews.
I'm not going to get into the validity of that right now, nor am I going to argue numbers or causal events. Needless to say, that is the accepted version of history passed down all these years through the Zionist prism.
Forgive the rotten pun, but gotta keep the train running.
Russell declined to say which organizations the publisher has approached — “less than 10 is probably fair.” Only Boston Children’s Museum has so far declined.
Charnow, the museum president, said that after the publisher first broached the idea last summer, the museum was inclined to pursue the funds, going so far as to develop a successful proposal for “Our City,” a media-rich exhibit meant to celebrate the city’s diverse cultural heritage while also tackling issues like bullying and tolerance. As the process continued, however, she had second thoughts about using funds so closely associated with the systematic genocide of Jews during World War II.
“I felt in the end that placing the consequences of this book in such close proximity to the Children’s Museum — with the care of this vulnerable population — I felt personally that this was not the right fit,” said Charnow, who added that the grant offer was “not so small that it was easy” to reject.
I'm starting to wonder whose buying the book.
Other groups have proved more willing. The Brookline-based Facing History and Ourselves, which creates education modules for use in schools, had previously received $200,000 in proceeds from the book to revamp “Holocaust and Human Behavior,” its core case study. Last summer, the organization submitted another proposal, for a new $150,000 grant, but was turned down.
“It laid out many of the priorities that Houghton Mifflin wanted to hit: far-reaching impact, broadening beyond the Holocaust to other sorts of civil rights,” said Roger Brooks, president and chief executive of Facing History and Ourselves. “We were told at that time we were one of three finalists. . . . We would have loved to have gotten the grant.”
Meanwhile, the Museum of Fine Arts has been circumspect since the publisher first invited it to propose a project last summer. One year later, the museum has yet to submit a proposal.
“We are thinking about the kind of project that might be appropriate, given the funding source,” Karen Frascona, director of public relations for the MFA, said via e-mail. “No decisions have been made yet.”
Although Russell declined to place a dollar value on the controversial grants, a person with knowledge of Houghton Mifflin’s grantmaking practices said that in years past about $60,000 has come into the fund annually. Accrual of those funds resulted in some sizeable grants, including the $200,000 it gave to Facing History in 2012 and the $100,000 it gave to the ADL over three years.
Mere pittances in today's world. So much money $lo$hing around out there.
Russell said the grants stand apart from the publisher’s more traditional charitable giving programs; last year, the publisher donated $238,000 in cash and some $87 million worth of books. He said he understands why some recoil from accepting grants derived from “Mein Kampf” sales.
“I really can’t be surprised by anyone’s decision to not accept those funds,” he said. “That book was used to propagate the near-extermination of an entire race of people.”
I'm thinking Native Americans, too, and that number way higher than 6 million.
Is that the problem? Places like Congo seen more dead?
The current Boston episode is but the latest chapter in Houghton Mifflin’s singular and often controversial relationship with “Mein Kampf” (“My Struggle”), a version of which the firm has published continuously since 1933, the year Hitler was first appointed chancellor of Germany.
Time to sever it(?)
In those early years, the publisher was assailed by Jewish leaders, with one editorial accusing the company of trying “to cash in on the misery and catastrophe of an important section of the human family.”
Such criticisms drew the ire of at least one Houghton Mifflin official, who sent a copy of the book to president Franklin D. Roosevelt with a note that stated, in part, “We have had no end of trouble over the book — protests from the Jews by the hundreds, and not all of them from the common run of shad.”
Before the war, Houghton Mifflin sent royalties directly to Hitler’s German publisher, Eher Verlag. The book soon became a best-seller in Germany, where the government purchased copies to give as gifts to newlyweds. By 1939, it had been translated into at least 11 languages and had sold about 5.2 million copies, laying the foundation of Hitler’s vast personal fortune.
Following the outbreak of World War II, the United States seized domestic royalties from the book by invoking the Trading with the Enemy Act. Proceeds from US sales were funneled to the Justice Department, which eventually transferred them to the War Claims Fund to help refugees and prisoners of war.
Meanwhile, Houghton Mifflin guarded and developed its asset, commissioning a full translation in 1943, advertising the book in newspapers, and suing rival publishers to protect its copyright.
Those were the days, huh?
Didn't Brown Brothers Harriman and the Bushes also help 'em out?
After the war’s end, the German copyright eventually transferred to the German state of Bavaria, which blocked its publication in Germany until earlier this year, when the copyright expired.
I thought I saw that on the shelves.
The book’s US publisher, on the other hand, continued to publish “Mein Kampf” after the war. Sales figures are hard to come by, but the Justice Department received a reported $139,000 in royalties between the outset of the war and 1979, when Houghton Mifflin purchased the royalty rights back from the government for about $37,000.
The publishing house kept the royalties and profits from the book from 1979 until 2000, when US News & World Report revealed Houghton Mifflin’s arrangement, and the company announced it would begin donating the profits to charity.
According to that report, the firm probably made between $300,000 and $700,000 in profits and royalties in the years before the practice was exposed.
“We can’t speak for the specific decisions made by the company generations ago,” said Russell, who noted that the publishing house retroactively donated the book's proceeds from those years. “We believe that the decisions made in recent history are in line with the mission and values of our company.”
Citing company policy, Russell declined to disclose how much money “Mein Kampf” has generated since 1979. He also declined to discuss how many copies of the book have been sold.
According to one industry database, however, Houghton Mifflin has sold about 350,000 copies in hardback and trade paperback since 1998, the year the current version was first published. The same database shows the company has sold more than 6,000 copies of the trade paperback this year.
Ebook sales are similarly robust, with one version (not published by Houghton Mifflin) ranking at No. 10 last week in the “Politics and Current Events” list on the iTunes store. Sales have spiked abroad as well. “Mein Kampf” was a bestseller in Turkey in 2005, and reached No. 2 in Germany when it first returned to print earlier this year. Pirated versions have also proliferated online — many available for free or for a nominal charge — a copyright infringement that Russell said Houghton Mifflin is “not interested” in trying to prevent.
What could be in there that has people so curious?
The ADL’s Trestan said that while the book’s continued popularity concerned him, it was important that “Mein Kampf” remain available and be presented in the right context.
No offense, but I feel I've been given my received history totally out of context for the benefit of a few chosen people.
“It serves a historical purpose,” he said. “We need to acknowledge the victims of the Holocaust, but we also need to use it as a way to ensure that humanity never repeats the mistakes of the people who were inspired by this book.”
It also allows the rest of humanity to be flogged over something they had nothing to do with for the obvious rea$on. I mean, I wasn't even born yet! Where you?
Similarly, although Charnow wants nothing to do with the book’s profits, she says she supports Houghton Mifflin’s efforts.
She added: “To essentially right the wrongs of the book and convert its negative intent to good by supporting efforts to promote racial and religious tolerance — it’s a beautiful vision.”
--more--"
In the interest of that I give you this accompanying piece:
"‘Never forget,’ the world said of the Holocaust. But the world is forgetting" by Jeff Jacoby Globe Columnist May 01, 2016
.... When the war was over and the mind-boggling scope of the Final Solution was fully grasped — the Germans and their collaborators had annihilated 6 million Jews from every corner of Europe, wiping out more than one-third of the world’s Jewish population — the moral imperative to remember grew even more intense.
But a commitment to remembrance spread far beyond the community of those most affected by the Nazis’ industrial-scale campaign to eradicate the Jews. In recent decades, Holocaust commemoration, particularly in the West, became a widespread cultural phenomenon. Countless books, lectures, and documentaries have been devoted to the topic. Academia is replete with Holocaust studies programs. On big and small screen alike, movies and miniseries on Holocaust themes have been runaway successes. Online resources for learning about the Holocaust are almost too numerous to count. And Holocaust memorials and museums have been erected in cities large and small, on every continent except Antarctica.
The Nazis’ extermination of European Jewry, an evil so unprecedented that the word “genocide” had to be coined to describe it, is among the most exhaustively researched, documented, and memorialized crimes of the 20th century.
Then why is it a crime to question certain elements of the story?
The powerful Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler, who in 1943 characterized the wholesale murder of the Jews, by then well underway, as “a glorious page in our history that . . . shall never be written,” was wrong. The history was written. Its remembrance is sustained by an ocean of scholarship, testimony, literature, and education. The last living survivors of the Holocaust are now mostly in their 80s or 90s. In a few years almost no one will be left to speak from personal experience of what it meant to be engulfed in the singular horror of the Shoah.
But the survivors have at least this reassurance: What happened to them will not be forgotten.
Or will it?
The events of the Holocaust have haunted me for as long as I can remember. My father, who was born in a tiny village on the Czechoslovak-Hungarian border in 1925, is a survivor of Hitler’s destruction. With his parents and four of his brothers and sisters, he was seized by the Nazis in the spring of 1944, imprisoned in a crowded ghetto, and then, after six weeks, herded into a cattle car to be transported to Auschwitz. Of the seven members of his immediate family who entered the death camp, six were murdered. Only my father escaped death.
For me, the Holocaust has always been intensely personal. It may have ended a decade and a half before I was born, but I have always understood that I was intended for obliteration too. In a Reichstag address in 1939, Hitler had vowed to achieve “the annihilation [Vernichtung] of the Jewish race in Europe.”
Jacoby didn't give the full contact, for Hitler was warning against international finance, the bankers, like they always do, plunging the world into war and what would be the result.
Obviously, he was wrong.
The essence of the Final Solution is that it was to be final. No Jews were to survive — above all, no Jewish children through whom 3,000 years of Jewish existence might continue. It was to that end that Germany constructed such a vast continent-wide operation and committed such immense financial resources: to track down and murder every last Jew in Europe.
Never before had a world power, deranged by anti-Semitism, made the eradication of an entire people its central aim, or gone to such exhaustive extremes to achieve it. That is what makes the Holocaust so grotesquely, terrifyingly unique. The unexampled virulence of anti-Semitism, a hatred older than and different from any other in human history, is at the heart of what the Holocaust is about — that, and the role of the Jews as the canary in the mine of civilization. When a society fills with toxic moral fumes, Jews become the target of bigotry and terror. But rarely does it end with them. Hitler set out to incinerate the Jews; in the end, all of Europe was in flames.
History is filled with terrible illustrations of the human capacity for cruelty, hatred, and violence. In every era, there have been ruthless tyrants willing to torture and kill in the pursuit of power and wealth. That intolerance and racism unchecked can lead to barbaric crimes is a vital lesson. But if there is no more to “Never Forget” than that, then Holocaust remembrance must be judged a failure.
I couldn't tolerate it any longer giving the Iraq WMDs lie that was used to push for a war and the resulting torture that has been admitted by the U.S. government.
Hate to say it, but that is your modern example. The good thing about this empire is they change figureheads every eight years.
It was always inevitable that the enormity of the Holocaust would recede in public awareness. The human mind is built to forget; neither individuals nor societies can prevent the intensity of agonizing memories from diminishing over time. In a new book, “In Praise of Forgetting,” David Rieff reflects on King Philip’s War, a murderous conflict between English settlers and Indians in 17th-century New England. On a per capita basis, it was the bloodiest war in American history, and those who survived the carnage must surely have been passionate in their conviction that it never be forgotten.
“And yet,” writes Rieff, “professional historians aside, King Philip’s War is almost never talked about. . . . The historical importance of an event in its own time and in the decades that follow offers no guarantee that it will be remembered in the next century, let alone for many centuries after.”
Sooner or later — sooner, I fear, than later — the same fate will overtake the Holocaust.
Unless it is seared into our memories and through generations with a transcendent importance.
Like other terrible eruptions of savagery and slaughter, the Holocaust will become, as it were, “ordinary” history. By now there is evidence aplenty that it is already fading from common knowledge. In 2013, a survey of more than 53,000 respondents in 101 countries found that only 54 percent of the world’s adults had even heard of the Holocaust — and of those, one-third believes it is either a myth or has been greatly exaggerated.
I would use the word distorted.
Dispiriting as those numbers are, they are bound to grow even worse. As the generation of Holocaust survivors passes away, as Holocaust-deniers spread their poison, as indifference to history takes its inevitable toll, remembrance of the Nazis’ Jewish genocide will dissipate.
More and more, Holocaust terminology and imagery will be trivialized. Indeed, the words and pictures have for years been shockingly misused. In its “Holocaust on your Plate” campaign, the animal-rights group PETA explicitly likened Hitler’s millions of human victims to chickens slaughtered for food.
He was kind of a hero to them, actually.
And when you think of the animal numbers.... zoom (and Bo$ton is only getting taller).
In Taiwan, giant images of Hitler, his arm raised in a Nazi salute, were used to advertise space heaters. In a TV broadcast, the evangelical preacher Pat Robertson insisted that “what Nazi Germany did to the Jews, so liberal America is now doing to evangelical Christians . . . . It’s no different, it’s the same thing.”
For a few decades after World War II, the sheer monstrousness of the Holocaust made it unthinkable as a subject for jokes.
Except for the classic comedy Hogan's Heroes(??).
But that, too, has gone by the boards, along with the brief postwar taboo that banished rank anti-Semitism from polite society. Now Holocaust jokes proliferate. “Tasteless and mean-spirited, some of these have become part of the repertoire of popular stand-up comedians,” writes Alvin Rosenfeld, a scholar at Indiana University. “By ridiculing and mocking Jewish suffering, comics like France’s Dieudonné, Norway’s Otto Jespersen, Ireland’s Tommy Tiernan, and their counterparts in other countries look to laugh away Hitler’s Jewish victims by deriding them.”
I've only seen one routine.
The world’s conscience was shocked, after the fact, by the scope and ferocity of the Holocaust. In the face of such monumental evil, “Never Forget,” like “Never Again,” may have seemed the only possible decent response.
But it wasn’t. Accounts of what was done in Treblinka did not prevent mass murder in Cambodia or Bosnia or Rwanda. Holocaust remembrance has not inoculated human beings against treating other human beings with brutality. Museums and films and college courses about the Shoah have not made genocide unthinkable — not even another Jewish genocide, as the regimes in Iran and Gaza frequently make clear.
He just lost me because 25,000 Jews are living happily and at peace in Iran.
Holocaust remembrance has not prevented the onset of Holocaust forgetfulness.
For survivors like my father, and for the sons and daughters they raised, it goes without saying that “Never Forget” remains an ineradicable moral imperative. I have always taken the Holocaust personally, and always will. But the world, I know, will not. Eventually, everything is forgotten. Even the worst crime in history....
Which would be the two a-bombs dropped on Japan.
--more--"
Look, I'm not going to pile on and take away the ownership he wants to have regarding the Holocaust™. Don't put it on me, though.
As for history, my received version has been turned upside down and inside out. By now it is clear that Hitler has western backers who were maneuvering him into war with Russia. When he did a U-turn and made a deal with Stalin the weak western powers Britain and France were ordered by the bankers to declare war. Had the result been different, it would have been London in rubble and Churchill the suicidal demon.
That's not to endorse everything Hitler did or the Nazi regime in general. Getting rid of the central bank was a good idea; the concentration camps were not.
Speaking of gulags:
"The curious dearth of Stalinist fiction" by Saul Austerlitz April 03, 2016
Life under Joseph Stalin was often brutal, dramatic, and short, so it’s curious that the period is still given such short shrift by fiction writers. Hitler’s Germany, by contrast, is very well-trod ground, and not many English-speaking writers have chosen to write about Stalin’s years in power the way they have pored over Adolf Hitler’s 12 years as Germany’s chancellor.
Yeah, turns out Stalin was much more murderous.
In the West, the Soviet purges of the late 1930s or the gulag aren’t discussed with the same authority or regularity as Kristallnacht or the concentration camps.
Because they were dead Gentiles.
Americans might be less receptive because of our own mythology of the Second World War. Anything that detracts from that simplified portrait is often unwelcome. Tales of Nazi horrors inflate the American experience and place American efforts front and center. Discussion of the central role of the Soviet Union, and its 20 million dead, deflates American experience and pushes American efforts to the margins.
Another possible explanation is Stalin’s recent rehabilitation in modern Russia. Communist purges and gulags have faded into the shadows, replaced by a gentler portrait of Stalin as a nationalist hero and savior, ushering the country manfully through the crucible of World War II. Vladimir Putin has to some degree remade Stalin in his own image, treating him as a firm if occasionally misguided predecessor. Stalin regularly places prominently in polls of most admired Russian historical figures, making a truthful accounting of Stalinism by Russian writers a far trickier proposition....
We call them president here.
--more--"
I didn't see anything the names Kaganovich and Yagoda (or even Beria for that matter), but I'm not complaining.
I'm not unfair, folks; the Globe does a decent job if you look far enough.
Tough breaking bread with a war-promoting pre$$, athough I'll tolerate the whining and will never forget the epiphany I've suffered after all these years.
Holy Holohoax. My Government Wouldn’t Lie To Me.
April 21, 2012
The Red Cross had unrestricted access each month to every German concentration camp including Auschwitz. They had inside men who reported to them in detail the activities at the camps.
In a Nov. 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials, the Red Cross said: “We had not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources …”
The Germans captured 150,000 British soldiers. 150 of those men were engineers who worked at Auschwitz-Birkenau to maintain the manufacturing plants that processed Silesian coal to make gasoline for the German Army. The Germans were using a coal gasification formula developed in 1915 in Russia. These 150 men obviously had daily access throughout the camps but to date neither a Nuremberg prosecutor nor a Holohoax researcher has cited their testimony. I wonder why.
Evidence of Nazis making soap and lampshades from Jews used to convict Germans at Nuremberg has been withdrawn from the Holohoax museums at Auschwitz and Jerusalem.
Dr. Charles Larson headed a team of forensic pathologists sent into the camps at the end of the war to document war crimes. They conducted hundreds of autopsies at more than twenty camps, they did not find a single body showing signs of gas poisoning. None have been found since, at any camp.
No Zyklon B was found in the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Treblinka when tests were conducted in 1991 by the Polish government under the close supervision of the Jewish museum curator. The Nazis supposedly tossed Zyklon, a commercial insecticide used for disinfection into the camps, to kill the Jews. The problem with this scenario is that a surreptitious video interview with the Director of the Auschwitz Museum revealed to the world that the chutes were installed by the Russians after the war.
The Encyclopedia Britannica in its 1963 edition states that 2,000,000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated by the Nazis in Mauthausen, a concentration camp in Austria. This absurd figure has been officially revised quite a lot. Now it is claimed that only 95,000 people died in Mauthausen, of which only 14,000 were Jews. An exaggeration of 1,905,000! After WW II a plague memorialized the deaths of 4,000,000 at Auschwitz. The plaque was replaced by one that reduced the total number of deaths to 1,500,000. But the six million total for Jewish victims of the Holohoax was not affected. A 1,905,000 reduction from Mauthausen plus a 2,500,000 reduction from Auschwitz did not change the total of 6 million. In 1990 the Auschwitz State Museum officially revised the death toll from 4,000,000 down to 1.1 million, of which 960,000 are claimed to be Jews. Russia released old Soviet files taken from Auschwitz further reduced the total deaths at that camp to 69,000. A report from the International Red Cross Tracing Service that tallied a total of 262,077 German concentration camp victims. Main cause of death: Typhus.
Obviously, the 6 million figure has mythic significance. The same figure was used in WW I against the Kaiser and against the czar prior to the war claiming in both cases that 6 million Jews were in peril. In 1897 a “Science of Religion” American magazine, claims nearly six million Jews were killed in the Bar Kokhba revolt 132-136 AD. Wikipedia says that act of war against Rome led to half a million Jewish deaths.
The Jews need to set the record straight about why they were in peril throughout history. In ancient Cyrene (modern Libya) the Jews massacred 220,000 innocent civilians. On the island of Cyprus there was no large Roman garrison so the Jews were able to kill 240,000 unarmed men, women and children. They drank their blood, ate their flesh and made belts from their intestines. Clearly their behavior taught the ancient world to hate the Jews long before the Catholic church became the established religion of the Roman Empire. In fact whenever the Jews poisoned a well or ritually murdered a young boy and drank his blood, the Catholic church protected the Jews.
The Donmeh cult were crypto Jews of Turkey who in name only practiced Islam. The Donmeh formed the Young Turks movement and with the help of the Rothschilds successfully revolted against the Sultan in 1908. In 1915 the Jews of Turkey massacred 1.5 million Armenians plus 250,000 Greek and Syrian Christians.
After the Jews took over Russia, they killed 350,000 priests. They also allowed their secret police to rape over half a million young Russian girls to death. They killed over 60,000,000 in their concentration camps. The Jews starved 10,000,000 to death in the Ukraine.
During the African slave trade the Jews killed millions of Africans. When Americans gave refuge to the Jews, the Jewish distillers and traders sold liquor to the Indians who routinely killed white settlers while drunk. Then the soldiers and the settlers would kill the Indians. This went on for almost 2 centuries. In the Opium wars the Jews killed millions of Chinese if you count the heroin related deaths. And even today Russian Jewish criminals traffick most of the 250,000 women and children kidnapped each year for the sex slave trade, Many of those women and children are killed in snuff films.
In 1942 a Jewish woman in Palestine asked an Arab neighbor to hide her 12 year-old daughter if the Germans took over their village. Her Arab neighbor said yes. Compare this behavior to Jewish Irgun terrorists who ruthlessly slaughtered Arab women and babies, then mutilated their corpses in the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin. In the course of two years Zionist Jews obliterated 419 Arab villages and built Jewish settlements in their place. This process of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their own homeland by Jews continues to this very day.
Contrast the above proven and known atrocities committed by Jews to the Holohoax.There was never any physical evidence of the Holohoax. No bodies, no murder weapons (‘gas chambers’), no documents, no photographs, no intercepted communications. The Russians originally charged the Germans with using steam chambers to kill Jews at Auschwitz. The Russians also falsely charged that the Nazis were responsible for the massacre of Polish officers and intellectuals at Katyn which was a Soviet crime. So where did all of the Holohoax evidence originate?
Soviet propagandists Ilya Ehrenburg and Vassily Grossman wrote The ‘Black Book’. The original book, published in the 40’s, had an appropriately all black cover. The current edition is 579 pages of pure phantasmagoria. Four bodies with hacked-off extremities, could be placed in the furnace at a time. It took fifteen minutes to burn four bodies (550 degrees Fahrenheit or 287.8 Celsius), and so with all furnaces working round the clock it was possible to burn 1,920 bodies in twenty-four hours. Taking into account the great quantities of bones discovered all over the camp, the committee of experts believes that bones were taken out of the furnaces before they could be completely consumed, and therefore, in fact, many more than 1,920 bodies were burned in twenty-four hours.”
Even school children had problems making sense of these Soviet Jewish tales. 4 million bodies could not have been cremated even if it were possible to dispose of 1,920 bodies a day for 1,400 days. Elie Wiesel in his book Night and Miklos Nyiszli in Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account claimed that 5,000 Jews a day were burned in an outdoor open pit at Auschwitz. When the CIA released OSS aerial photos of Auschwitz with neither open pit fires nor smoke coming from the crematoria chimneys, Elie Wiesel said on ABC TV News that the Nazis must have burned bodies only at night with no mention of open pit with burning. The US Department of Homeland Security has bought industrial size incinerators to burn million of American bodies just in case ‘someone’ releases a plague to kill us.
Elie Wiesel testified in a court of law in San Francisco that he still had the tatoo number A7713 on his left arm. Yet I have seen photos of you in short sleeves with no tatoo at all. Mr Wiesel is obviously a liar.
I recently received a letter from a Jew who tried to lower the number killed in gas chambers but raise the number found in mass graves of Jews killed by the 1,500 members of the Einstatzgruppen. Mass graves of Christians killed by Jewish Communists have been found but few Jewish bodies were ever found. The Jewish Virtual Library has an explanation. They said the Nazis poured gasoline (which in WW II was a scarce item on the Russian front) on the bodies of the Jews which made the ashes, bones, bullets and other artifacts disappear. Bones are not evaporated by gasoline fires. And fires create ashes. None of these Holohoax stories make a lot of sense. It is only the threat of ostracism that allows them to be sold.
I had a Russian Jewish friend who told me that in the 1930s the Jews used to call the secret police and inform on Christian neighbors telling the police they had evidence of them having Bibles and saying prayers. They knew such accusations would get their neighbors killed. My Jewish friend told me the police would laugh and tell them they knew about those people. They explained that they had simply run past their quota and would get those Christians in a month or two. Apparently, real genocides take time and effort and do not occur as a result of magic.
Many critics have examined Jewish population figures from before and after the war. The World Almanac says there were 8,939,608 Jews in Europe before the war and 9,372,666 after the Holohoax. These figures do not reflect the millions of Jews who fled to America and to Israel after the war.
The Luxembourg Agreement forced the West German government to pay reparations to Jewish “Holocaust survivors” who died before the West German compensation law (BEG) was enacted in 1953 or before it really became effective in 1956 did not include Jews living in the Soviet Union.
And the Atlanta Journal and Constitution stated in 1985 that about half of the Jewish “survivors” in the world have never received reparations money number of successful claims was 4,344,378 80 percent, or 3.5 million, of the 4.344 million claims were from Jews. Not much evidence of a Jewish population loss.
Churchill’s Second World War does not mention Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war. Ditto for Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Memoirs is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages there is no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”
Contrast the Holohoax to Eisenhower’s treatment of the Germans after WW II. Ike who was Jewish put German POWs and others ranging in age from 13 to their 80s into camps. They had no tents or buildings. The Germans were kept inside fences with no shelter from the cold, the wind, the rain, the snow, the heat and the sun with little or no food. Eisenhower ordered anyone who fed the starving men shot. A million men died in a year. 58 million people died in World War II. To only remember the Jewish dead and to claim their suffering was ‘special’ is to say that we are not real human and that only Jews are human.
Edmund Husserl who was Jewish said that a paranoid only feels his pain and never feels the pain he inflicted on others. I always felt he was describing self-appointed Jewish leaders. Jewish people know their leaders are insane. Gentiles must learn that fact too. I have met many Jewish people who told me they do not believe in the Holohoax. Many Jewish people have told us they believe 911 was an Inside Job. But few have said Israel did 911. Think of the pure insanity of a small nation that would attack the world’s last Super Power. Israeli leaders and the Jewish bankers of New York and London want America to attack Iran so there will be a world war and the United States will lose. These men are insane. Do not believe their lies. They will destroy the world. They are too hate filled to survive.
Lessons Learned From The Holohoax.
On 911 we believed the Jewish media, the Zionists and the Israelis when they said the Muslims did it. Jewish lies were used to convince America and NATO to wage war against Iraq and Afghanistan killing millions of innocent people while wasting trillions of dollars for Jewish whims and fantasies.
No one group of men should have so much power that they can force tens of millions of people if not billions to die for their fantasies.
The Holohoax is still being used to justify war with Iran and the continuing occupation of Palestine. If you think World War III is a Really Bad Idea, you have no choice but to expose the lies of the Holohoax and 911. If denying the Holohoax is a crime in your country, then concentrate on 911. We are gathering new converts every day. We have friends in the military and the police. We will win. They will lose.
Notes: Please consider: Go Beyond Left And Right To An Anti-Banker Party Part II
https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/go-beyond-left-and-right-to-an-anti-banker-party-part-ii/
Mr Wiesel, I Would Like To Ask You A Few Questions.
https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/mr-wiesel-i-would-like-to-ask-you-a-few-questions/
References: I became involved in this after listening to Carolyn Yeager speak on the radio. I went to her website here first:
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/
You can listen to podcasts of Carolyn’s radio show here:
http://reasonradionetwork.com/tag/carolyn-yeager
If you would like to trace the documents on Lazar Wiesel who has tatoo number A7713, please go here:
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/the-evidence/the-documents
To see the aerial photo evidence or lack thereof please go here:
http://air-photo.com/index.php
The above website’s photos reveal many other discrepancies with the testimony of Holohoax perpetrators.
These are great websites for research:
http://www.codoh.co
http://www.holohoax101.com/
http://www.theholohoax.com/
Holohoax Survivors who Tell the Truth
Mr Wiesel, I Would Like To Ask You A Few Questions.
https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/mr-wiesel-i-would-like-to-ask-you-a-few-questions/
References: I became involved in this after listening to Carolyn Yeager speak on the radio. I went to her website here first:
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/
You can listen to podcasts of Carolyn’s radio show here:
http://reasonradionetwork.com/tag/carolyn-yeager
If you would like to trace the documents on Lazar Wiesel who has tatoo number A7713, please go here:
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/the-evidence/the-documents
To see the aerial photo evidence or lack thereof please go here:
http://air-photo.com/index.php
The above website’s photos reveal many other discrepancies with the testimony of Holohoax perpetrators.
These are great websites for research:
http://www.codoh.co
http://www.holohoax101.com/
http://www.theholohoax.com/
Holohoax Survivors who Tell the Truth
