So don't call 'em that, right, 'bamer?
Obama sidesteps 'genocide' label
And Lord help you try any of 'em, never mind there war criminal bosses.
And I'm not even including the millions of people murdered by their lies!!!
Of course, when it comes to sucking Zionist cheek there is no one better than the schvartze president.
"At Holocaust remembrance, Obama warns against the dangers of silence" by Associated Press | April 24, 2009
WASHINGTON - President Obama stood yesterday with Jewish leaders at a solemn Holocaust remembrance in a cavernous Capitol hall, proclaiming: "Never again."
Obama warned against what he called the dangers of silence, saying that every day, somewhere in the world people must resist the urge to turn away from scenes of horror, hate, injustice, and intolerance. All people, he said, must "fight the impulse to turn the channel" from distressing TV images of suffering, the sort of inhumanity known not only in the time of Nazi Germany, but more recently in Rwanda and Darfur.
Yeah, not where he is dropping missiles.
Btw, PALESTINE a concern in there somewhere, shitter?
As for turning the channel, it happens every time I see your ugly mug.
Obama declared that people cannot wrap themselves "in the false comfort that others' sufferings are not our own." The president also called for people to "make a habit of empathy, to recognize ourselves in each other."
Oh, I have been doing that, sir. Haven't you been reading my blog?
When you gonna call of the missile strikes and bring the troops home?
And PALESTINE?
"We've seen it, in this century, in the mass graves and the ashes of villages burned to the ground and children used as soldiers and rape used as a weapon of war," Obama said.
Why is he bringing Vietnam up?
Without naming names, he noted that some still deny the Holocaust. At the same time, Obama said that apathy in the face of such a mind-set must be fought at all times.
You know, I watch less of this president than the last one because they both sicken the hell out of me.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently caused a stir at a UN conference by accusing Israel of being a racist nation. Earlier in yesterday's ceremony, Holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel noted his disgust with Ahmadinejad's comments and thanked the Obama administration for boycotting the UN conference.
Turns out, Wiesel's book is a lie!
See: Elie Wiesel's book is now suspected to be another in a long series of literary hoaxes. (--hattip--)
Obama said part of the responsibility for the Holocaust rests with people who "accepted the assigned role of bystander."
Then YOU HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS, Americans, for not stopping this MASS-MURDERING, WAR-MONGERING GOVERNMENT!!!!
I must admit, the HOLOHOAX™ lie was one of the most crushing and difficult to absorb.
Having been raised in a Zionist-controlled society, the thought was nearly impossible: the Jews lied? The first thing that raised alarm bells was the discrepancy in the numbers. Then there was the replacing of the plaque and so much more. The lack of mass graves at Treblinka (watch: video); the removal of the photographs; the lie of the First World War; the exhaustive documentation of the holohoax; the extortion racket arising from such; the outright lies; the Red Cross totals; the sloppy record keeping and limited access; and on and on.
In fact, just read this: How One American Evolved into a "Holocaust Denier"
Combined with all I have learned about Israeli involvement in 9/11 (from Odigo to the five dancing Israelis to what Netanyahu said to the airport security firms to P-Tech and the Mossad-Israeli Connection To 9/11), and all the other missing links, there is a level of betrayal here that is nearly beyond belief.
I guess it IS a the HOLOHOAX™ after all!
So know we know what "mainstream historians" -- and some not so not so mainstream -- are all about!
AHEM!!!!!!!
"Prof. Zelikow’s area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, 'public myths’ or 'public presumptions’ which he defines as 'beliefs (1) thought to be true ( although not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community.’ In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called 'searing’ or 'molding’ events (that) take on transcendent’ importance and therefore retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene….He has noted that 'a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all." ("Thinking about Political History" Miller center Report, winter 1999, p 5-7)
Isn’t that the same as saying there is neither history nor truth; that what is really important is the manipulation of epochal events so they serve the interests of society’s managers? Thus, it follows that if the government can create their own "galvanizing events", then they can write history any way they choose."
What a COINCIDENCE, huh?
Oh, yeah, I'm sick of the Zionist jewspaper, too!!!
