"Mom doesn’t know best. Buying is easy, selling is hard — and best left up to the professionals."
Yeah leave it all to Wall Street and the money managers. I mean, they have taken such good care of us all so far!
UPDATE:
"Predictions that the economy would grow more quickly in 2014 have not come true. Growth has repeatedly fallen short of the Fed’s expectations in recent years.... The Fed’s critics have gotten some of their biggest predictions wrong."
Mixed me$$ages aside.... (sigh)
"A mostly ignored stock market has roared back" by Shirley Leung | Globe Staff, March 05, 2014
How do I know if the stock market is in a bubble?
When Mom starts giving me stock tips.
And she hasn’t, not once in this five-year bull run we’re in. Compare that with the late ’90s, when it seemed like she was calling every week to drop a get-rich-quick tip that would make me want to ditch my day job for day trading.
When you start looking at the numbers, it’s actually quite extraordinary to see how far the stock market has roared back — and how we have mostly chosen to ignore it.
Five years ago this week, the Dow Jones industrial average skidded to the 6,500-point level as the world churned through a financial crisis and the Fed desperately pumped money into a lifeless economy.
At Tuesday’s close, the Dow was just shy of 16,400, following a year in which it grew by nearly 30 percent....
Despite eye-popping returns, a lot of cash is still sitting on the sidelines in safe CDs, money markets, and probably under a lot of mattresses.
Related: Corporations Sitting on $1.8 Trillion in Cold Hard Cash
It's up to 1.95 trillion now!
The memories of two big crashes less 10 years apart are seared into our 401(k) portfolios.
That’s one of the reasons some Wall Street gurus don’t think we’re heading into a bubble — the point at which good times suddenly implode. Sure, corporate profits are expected to rise, interest rates remain low, and the nation’s economy is growing, but droves of mom and pop investors have yet to jump into stocks, prompting a new round of buying that would push healthy stock prices even higher....
They want your money now!
Related: The wealthiest philanthropists did not give as much in 2013 as they gave before the Great Recession, even as a strong stock market and better business climate have continued to concentrate American wealth in the top 1 percent of earners.
Now go inve$t in the stock market, Ma and Pa!
John Spooner should be feeling the love. But over dinners and cocktails last year, the charming Boston money manager — who is a also best-selling author on investing — might as well have been a social pariah....
Aww, poor little rich man!
Related: Taking a Glancy at Putnam
John Hailer, who oversees the mutual fund firm Natixis’s investments in the Americas and Asia, said today’s investors are more sophisticated. They’re asking about unemployment numbers, the retail sector, the Chinese economy. And if anyone is worried about a bubble, he’ll tell them it doesn’t matter.
“I don’t really care if we are at the top. I don’t care if we are at the bottom,” he said. “Without risk, you don’t get a return.”
Our new sober attitude — however sobering — is actually healthy. We’re thinking about how to invest for the long term — buying and holding. We’re not glued to CNBC, chasing paper riches and trolling for stock tips from cabbies, bartenders, or hairdressers.
Joseph Kennedy Sr., who was a savvy investor, liked to joke about how he survived the 1929 crash that ushered in the Great Depression.
The summer before, he started to get unsolicited stock advice from people like the shoeshine boy and the newsstand dealer. That’s when he knew it was time to get out, finding no wisdom in crowds.
Today, even Eddie McGuire, the longtime bartender at the Langham Hotel in the heart of the Financial District, has stopped passing along tips. It’s just as well, because the traders and brokers who stream in after the 4 p.m. Wall Street close aren’t saying much about what they’re into.
Instead, over Bud Lights, they’re complaining about how commissions used to be better. Back in the ’90s, it was martinis all around.
“It’s not really as fun as it used to be,” said McGuire.
What we’ve learned, in all of this, is that maybe Mom doesn’t know best. Buying is easy, selling is hard — and best left up to the professionals.
--more--"
Who has she been hanging around with?
"After the Hill, what’s next for Deval Patrick?" by Shirley Leung | Globe Staff February 28, 2014
For sure, Deval Patrick has a killer resume. Governor of Massachusetts. General counsel of Coca-Cola. Harvard Law grad. Great communicator. Hobbies include cooking and gardening.
He’ll have no trouble finding a job after his second term ends in January, but can he find his bliss?
Patrick, according to close associates, is starting to think about life after public office and what he might do next. And who can really blame him? With so many bad days at the office — marijuana licensing gone to pot, a missing 5-year-old boy under state care, and a broken health care website — I, too, would be itching to update my LinkedIn profile.
Related: Can't Find DCF Draft
State Health Site on Iselin
Patrick Feeling His Oates
The 57-year-old lawyer doesn’t want to go back to practicing law. Been there, done that. He’s not really interested in running a foundation or becoming president of a university. He wants a break from politics, and managing academia would probably be too close to home — all those tenured professors refusing to fall into line.
Patrick does want to make money, and the private sector is where he wants to be. He’d like to run a company, much the way he has been the chief executive of the Commonwealth, overseeing a $32 billion budget and about 45,000 employees in the executive branch.
According to confidantes, the governor is enamored with our innovation economy, from clean tech to biotech. One of Patrick’s legacies will be the state’s 10-year, $1 billion life sciences initiative, and I’m sure there would be no shortage of opportunities if he wanted to work in that sector. One tip: If you interview for a tech job, don’t mention last year’s software tax debacle.
He could become a venture capitalist, seeding and building the next Biogen Idec or EMC. But if he is really eyeing a White House run after 2016, voters might be wary of that label.
What else could Patrick do? He’s a great orator, and I bet he could take on Tony Robbins as a motivational speaker any day. The camera also loves our governor, who cooks like a chef and grows his own garlic. Might he be the next Food Network star?
But it’s complicated for a sitting governor thinking about the next chapter. Patrick may have to file a disclosure form if the relationship with a prospective employer would create the appearance of a conflict of interest. (So much for the blackjack croupier gig.)
Associates are adamant that Patrick will wait until he leaves office to launch a formal job search because he’s determined to finish what he started. Not all our governors have felt that way; there was a stretch when it seemed liked everyone wanted to leave us mid-tenure to pursue other opportunities.
Jane Swift, who completed Paul Cellucci’s term after he became ambassador to Canada in 2001, said she wasn’t shy about telling people she wanted to do something related to education. But her job hunting didn’t begin in earnest until later because of those cumbersome disclosure requirements.
“It was almost impossible to get into serious discussions until you were out of office,” recalled Swift, 49, who was Cellucci’s lieutenant governor. “It was awkward.”
Swift eventually landed a position at Arcadia Partners, a for-profit education industry venture firm. She remains in education today, as the chief executive of Middlebury Interactive Languages in Vermont. In retrospect, she said, delaying her search didn’t hurt her chances.
“When you’re a former governor, you’re always former governor, and people tend to return your phone calls,” said Swift.
Other former governors have gone on to a variety of careers. Ed King did public relations. Bill Weld dabbled in private equity, wrote novels, and practiced law. Independently wealthy Mitt Romney ran for president twice.
If you saw the recent “Mitt” documentary on Romney’s failed 2012 presidential campaign, there might be some confusion about what Mike Dukakis does these days. In one scene, Romney tells donors that presidential nominees who lose the general election “become a loser for life.” To drive home the point, he makes an “L” shape with his fingers and holds it in front of his forehead.
“Mike Dukakis, you know, he can’t get a job mowing lawns,” Romney says in the movie.
Well, actually, Dukakis, 80, has been a professor at Northeastern University, teaching public policy, since 1991.
“I couldn’t really understand that,” the Duke said of the “Mitt” diss. “Teaching is work.”
So what will work for Patrick? Wait for it.
--more--"
Related: Shining a Light on Patrick's Legacy
And he is thinking presidency?
"The Patrick administration has offered state lawmakers a forceful defense of its heavily criticized process for selecting medical marijuana companies."
"A key lawmaker reviewing the controversial selection process for medical marijuana companies in Massachusetts said Thursday that the state Department of Public Health should reconsider some of the highly rated proposals that were not approved for provisional licenses. “We’re essentially giving them another look,” said state Representative Jeffrey Sánchez, whom House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo tapped last month to investigate the process for issuing licenses."
Also see: Cannabis-growing expertise barely rated by Mass. regulators
I'm done with that subject for now.
Time to move on:
"Mass. fellowships aim to elevate women in business" by Erin Ailworth and Deirdre Fernandes | Globe Staff, March 12, 2014
The Patrick administration will fund at least a dozen yearlong graduate fellowships to place women in state managerial jobs at full salary, with the aim of helping more of them gain entrance to the executive suites in government and private organizations.
Government serving the already wealthy and privileged -- again!
The program, expected to cost roughly $1 million in its first year, follows recent studies that show Massachusetts is not keeping pace with other states in terms of women achieving leadership posts. One report, for example, found that more than half the state’s largest publicly traded companies did not have any female executive officers.
“We’re in the midst of the most profound global economic competition,” Governor Deval Patrick said Tuesday. “To me that means we need all the talent on the field ready to play.”
The fellowship, to be formally announced Wednesday, is being developed with Bentley University and its Center for Women in Business. Many of the details of the program are still being worked out, but state officials hope to begin accepting applications by the end of April, and placing fellows in full-time jobs in September. The program will offer periodic seminars to the fellows on topics such as salary negotiations and public speaking.
In addition to the fellowship, Patrick on Wednesday is expected to issue an executive order creating a task force to explore policy changes, legislation, and other initiatives to eliminate barriers that inhibit women from advancing in the public and private sectors.
Well, he is behaving exactly like a president.
The goal of the fellowship program is to create a model of mentoring and leadership growth that companies and other organizations can use to help more women follow successful executives such as Karen Kaplan, chief executive of the Boston-based advertising agency Hill Holliday, and Anne Finucane, the global strategy and marketing officer at Bank of America, into boardrooms and corner offices.
Wonderful role models for all you girls out there.
Despite Massachusetts’ image as forward-looking, recent studies have shown that it may not be as progressive toward women as it might seem from its reputation.
What, what, what?
See: Mass. high on list of poor working women
Yeah, nothing has changed at all!
***************
Another study, by the Working Poor Families Project, a national initiative to strengthen policies that help low-income households, found that Massachusetts has one of the highest concentrations of poor working women at the head of a household.
Carol Fulp, a former senior vice president at John Hancock Financial and now chief executive of The Partnership, a nonprofit that promotes diversity in Boston, praised Patrick’s initiative as a much needed “spotlight” that she hoped would spur the corporate world to do more to elevate women into high-level jobs.
It's not the gender or race that matters; it is cla$$.
***************
The Patrick administration has a good record of placing women in leadership roles....
Like Olga Roche, right?
--more--"
Related: Steward again a big backer of Martha Coakley
"Governor Deval Patrick gave it frosty treatment and, in the words of a Globe editorial, “treated her like a cabinet official gone rogue.” As is the case with the new business tax audit controversy, there were whispered complaints about grandstanding."
But he cares so much and has done so many good things for women!
Also see:
"Chief Justice Roderick L. Ireland, the first African-American on the Supreme Judicial Court, announced Monday that he is retiring, giving Governor Deval Patrick an opportunity to name a new head of the state’s highest court before he leaves office."
Related: To diversify Boston, we need more white men who can jump
That's the last time I listen to "Mom."