The omission screams controlled-opposition, as do some other odd things.
"Homeland Security issued report on extremists despite concerns; Some veterans' groups offended by the wording" by Eileen Sullivan, Associated Press | April 17, 2009
WASHINGTON - Civil liberties officials at the Homeland Security Department did not agree with some of the language in a controversial report on right-wing extremists, but the agency issued the report anyway.
The intelligence assessment issued to law enforcement last week said some military veterans could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or commit lone acts of violence. That prompted angry reactions from some lawmakers and veterans' groups....
Oh, please get off the LONE GUNMEN s***!!!!
What SOME PATSIES being set up some where!?
Janet Napolitano, secretary of Homeland Security, defended the report yesterday, but she said the definition of right-wing extremism that was included in a footnote should be changed. In the report, right-wing extremism was defined as hate-motivated groups and movements, such as hatred of certain religions, racial, or ethnic groups. "It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration," the report said.
Yeah, so if you are SOME AGENDA-PUSHING ENVIRO-PUKE or some ILLEGAL or PRO-GAY, etc, etc, then you are OKAY!!!!
Yeah, I know some lefty outfits get roughed up once in a while, but it's clear to me that's just a game for you and the world, 'murka. Gives you the appearance of dissent, etc, without really providing any.
Where are the left-wing 9/11 Truthers or freedom-fighters? Exactly. Hey, I'm not trying to be divisive; however, you can't keep believing in people who fail to see the full picture. Three-quarter truths ain't getting it done anymore!!!
"If there's one part of that report I would rewrite, in the wordsmithing Washington-ese that goes on after the fact, it would be that footnote," Napolitano said yesterday on Fox News.
Yeah, she's got NO PROBLEM with LABELING AMERICANS TERRORISTS, just with the wording of it.
How much more smoke you need blown up your ass, America, before you start firing back?
The same definition was included in the agency's March 26 report on domestic extremism. Both reports were marked "For Official Use Only." The report on right-wing extremists cites the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing by military veteran Timothy McVeigh as one instance of a veteran becoming a domestic terrorist.
Yeah, ABOUT OKC: VIDEO (about 16 minutes in, run time 30 mins)
Several lawmakers, the American Legion, and Vets for Freedom took offense to the intelligence review. The Veterans of Foreign Wars defended it as an assessment, not an accusation.
Napolitano said, "We do not mean to suggest that veterans as a whole are at risk of becoming violent extremists."
No, but their expertise would be handy in resisting any actions of tyranny by this government. That's what this is all about, not "terrorism" because WE KNOW WHO the "terrorists" are -- FALSE-FLAGGING HACKS down in Washington DC and Langley VA!
