Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Pollsters Living in the Past

I can explain it in one word, guys: RIGGED!

Also see:

Stolen Elections: 2000

Stolen Elections: 2004

Stolen Elections: 2006

"Pollsters try to explain Obama's loss in N.H.

It was one of the nagging mysteries of the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries: Why were the polls so wrong in New Hampshire?

See: Election Fraud 2008

How Hillary Clinton Stole New Hampshire

Coming off his victory in the Iowa caucuses and drawing large crowds, Barack Obama was ahead in the final surveys and appeared primed to all but sew up the nomination by winning the January contest. But Hillary Rodham Clinton, who the day before the primary choked up when talking about why she was in the race, pulled off her version of the "comeback kid" routine, won the Granite State primary by 39 percent to 36 percent over Obama, and ended up staying in the race until June.

In a report released yesterday, a panel of polling specialists didn't come to any definitive conclusions, but said that the polling probably ended too early to take into account late movement among voters.

Also, Clinton supporters were harder to reach and some pollsters did not try more than twice, skewing the sample toward pro-Obama voters, said the committee organized by the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

The panel discounted other possible explanations, such as the so-called "Bradley effect," in which some white voters say they will support a black candidate, but don't vote that way in the privacy of the polling booth.

--more--"

The answer is STARING YOU RIGHT in the FACE, folks!!!

Looking back, not of this mattered. It was just a bunch of political fooleys.

I mean, where is Hillary Clinton now?