Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Eye On Afghanistan: We Are Staying

Boooooooo!

Am I angry about the antiwar rhetoric that helped him get "elected?"

Yup!

Boooooooooooo!!!!


I DO NOT WANT BEAUTIFUL and INNOCENT PEOPLE being MURDERED in MY NAME ANYMORE, 'kay? Can I make it any clearer?


"RAND report urges new Afghan strategy" by Associated Press | February 17, 2009

Well, that would entail LEAVING, wouldn't it?


WASHINGTON - As President Barack Obama prepares to send troops to war for the first time as commander in chief, a new report says a "game-changing" strategy is urgently needed in Afghanistan to save the faltering international campaign.

"All is not lost in Afghanistan," RAND Corp. experts said in a paper being released today by the congressionally funded United States Institute of Peace.

No, just a LOT of AFGHAN LIVES so far -- and taxpayer money that was looted.

"But urgent measures - what might be called 'game-changing steps' - are now needed to stem an increasingly violent insurgency," said authors Seth G. Jones and C. Christine Fair....

Yeah, I TOLD YOU HOW: LEAVE!!!!!!

--more--"

WASHINGTON - President Obama approved adding about 17,000 US troops for the flagging war in Afghanistan, his first significant move to change the course of a conflict that his closest military advisers have warned the United States is not winning....

Please, please, please, BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!!!!!!

Why must ANYONE ELSE DIE for a LOSING EFFORT?

"There is no more solemn duty as president than the decision to deploy our armed forces into harm's way," Obama said. "I do it today mindful that the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan demands urgent attention and swift action."

Then WHY DID YOU DO IT when you MUST KNOW "Al-CIA-Duh" is a U.S.-BACKED CREATION and 9/11 is a LIE!!!

**************

Ahead of his first foreign trip this week, Obama told a Canadian news organization that the United States will seek a more comprehensive, diplomatic approach to Afghanistan, where the United States has been engaged in war since 2001.

When the MISSILES STOP FALLING and the TROOPS are HOME, I'll believe him.

Until then....

"I am absolutely convinced that you cannot solve the problem of Afghanistan, the Taliban, the spread of extremism in that region solely through military means," the president said in a White House interview with Toronto-based Canadian Broadcasting Corp.

Not since Alexander, and not this empire.

Obama is scheduled to make a day trip to Ottawa tomorrow. Obama agreed to a troop recommendation from Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the lone holdover from the Bush Cabinet....

There is your change, AmeriKa!

Obama informed congressional leaders and the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, by phone. The planned troop deployment does not preclude sending more forces in the future, the official said. Any others, however, would come as part of a broader strategic review of the entire policy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not as a stand-alone troop decision, the official said.

That review should be completed sometime around the end of March, which coincides with a NATO summit in Europe.

Yeah, imagine that.

The strategy review for the Iraq war is expected to be completed in about two weeks or so, with announcements expected then on troop drawdowns, the White House official said.

US commanders have said they want to beef up the expeditionary units and trainers in Afghanistan's southern region with enough new troops to stem the violence without becoming an occupying force that would alienate the population.

And that is EXACTLY what MORE TROOPS will DO!

Related: The Losing of Hearts and Minds in Afghanistan

Obviously we DO NOT CARE what the AFGHANS think, so we are certainly NOT THERE for DEMOCRACY.

Must be an OIL PIPELINE (wink, wink) then, huh?

--more--"

And WHY may they NOT WELCOME US, Amurkn?


"Afghan war civilian toll rose by 40%" by Associated Press | February 18, 2009

KABUL, Afghanistan - The number of civilians killed in Afghanistan's worsening conflict jumped 40 percent to a new high last year, and more than half of the deaths were inflicted by Taliban insurgents and other militants, the United Nations said yesterday.

Oh, that's what the U.N. SAYS, huh?

For the record, I regard ALL DEATHS as attributable to the UNITED STATES because THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE OCCURRED had WE NOT BEEN where we have NO BUSINESS!!!!!!!!! 9/11 is an INSIDE JOB LIE, pinned on the dead patsy buried in the mountainside, period!! NO MORE LIES, because THEY ARE ALL INNOCENTS up in those hills!!!!!!!!!!

The report said insurgents increasingly use roadside bombs, car bombs, and suicide bombers in attacks that are "undertaken regardless of the impact on civilians." In the latest such attack, the US military reported a roadside bomb killed five civilians Monday in Kandahar province.

Yeah, about those!!! Please see Occupation Iraq: Israel's IEDs and related links, readers, for WHO is RESPONSIBLE for the violence -- and keep that in mind as you read the Zionist War Daily's accounts!!

Two of the worst civilian tolls from insurgent attacks came in a February suicide bombing at a dogfighting contest in Kandahar that the UN said killed 67 civilians and a car bombing at the Indian Embassy last July that killed 55 civilians.

Yeah, the FALSE-FLAG STENCH STILL LINGERS!

Can't you SMELL IT, cui bono?

Commanders of US and other international troops in Afghanistan have long sought to emphasize how militant attacks kill far more civilians than the soldiers or officials targeted....

And the U.N just helped 'em out.

Civilian deaths have been a huge source of friction between the international military forces and President Hamid Karzai, who has demanded that US troops avoid killing ordinary Afghans.

You wouldn't mind if some superpower invader dropped bombs on your house and killed your family, right, Amurkns?! Just checking.

(Actually, you don't. You've let the 9/11 criminals fade into the shadows and are talking a daily bailout farting on top of your heads)

He says civilian deaths are undermining support for the anti-Taliban fight.

Duh! Ya think?

--more--"