Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Kennedy's Lost Clout Means Less Tax Loot For Massachusetts

It will just be going somewhere else now.

"Businesses uneasy without Kennedy; Health, tech firms relied on senator" by Robert Gavin and Liz Kowalczyk, Globe Staff | September 1, 2009

The death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy is raising concerns about the future of programs he championed that benefited the state’s major employers, particularly in the fields of health care, higher education, and technology....

The state’s health care industry is likely to miss Kennedy the most. He championed the merger of city and university hospitals that created Boston Medical Center in 1996 as a way to protect services for the poor, and helped secure $25 million for its cancer treatment center.

He made sure that Medicare included funding for teaching hospitals, which have a major presence in Massachusetts, and created a program to pay for doctors’ training at children’s hospitals. That program brings $21 million a year to Boston’s Children’s Hospital, and helped it erase seven-figure losses....

Which sounds great, but....

Related: Why the Nation Doesn't Need Massachusetts Health Care

The Boston Globe Shuts Off Its Spotlight

“He kind of protected us in a sense,’’ said Thomas Glynn, chief operating officer of Partners HealthCare, which includes Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “The question is five years from now will [hospitals] be getting as much money as they would if he were alive. I doubt it.’’

They overcharged us and now that is why our grand healthcare "experiment' is failing! Then the Globe decides to hide their award-winning report? WTF?

***********

And all you lefty-liberal, antiwar types (provided you aren't frauds) will LUUUVVV THIS:

Kennedy also helped restore funding for the Navy’s Zumwalt-class destroyer, a major contract for Waltham defense giant Raytheon Corp. He provided support to other weapons systems that benefited the Massachusetts economy, such as the F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jet made by Boeing Co. of Chicago. The program, which relies on more than 100 Massachusetts subcontractors, accounts for nearly 4,000 direct and indirect jobs in the state, Boeing estimated....

Related: Meet Your Antiwar New England Liberals

Kennedy’s command of the political process and his stature in both the state and the nation allowed him to pull together interests and resources as few others could, institutional and business leaders said.

One example is the alliance he formed with Mitt Romney, the former governor and a Republican who once challenged Kennedy for his seat. They worked together to save Hanscom Air Force Base during a round of base closings a few years ago. Hanscom, which specializes in developing communications, surveillance, and other technologies, is a driver of the state’s tech sector....

Yeah, bipartisan fascism is GOOD for our state.

Hospitals, universities, life sciences companies, and research centers - which together provide hundreds of thousands of jobs in the state - all were accustomed to turning to Kennedy for help.

As chairman of the Senate committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, he was in an ideal position to deliver on their requests for assistance. And as a powerful member of the Armed Services Committee, he defended and promoted the state’s technology-based defense sector....

It’s still too early to fully assess how Massachusetts will fare without his clout, experience, and personal connections, business leaders say. Indeed, while he steered federal funding to help Massachusetts industries, he also supported measures, such as higher taxes and additional regulations, that businesses say hurt them. His lifetime ratings on issues important to US business was 24 out of 100, according the US Chamber of Commerce.

Still, business leaders fear his success in advancing the interests of Massachusetts will not be easily replaced. While he generally did not earmark specific projects for Massachusetts, the state’s industries were well positioned to benefit from broader policies and programs that he was instrumental in shaping.

For example, Kennedy led efforts to double funding for the National Institutes of Health, a major sponsor of health-related research, as well as boosting money for the National Science Foundation. Massachusetts captures more than $5 billion a year in federal research money, according to the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. The money goes to a variety of recipients, including hospitals and universities. On a per capita basis, Massachusetts’ share of federal research and development money ranks second only to Virginia among leading technology states.

“Innovation and discovery are things that are tough to support in some quarters because they are far away and academic,’’ said Henri A. Termeer, chief executive of Genzyme Corp., a leading biotechnology company in Cambridge. “He was intensely interested in innovation. Now, we will have to try to manage without that support.’’

Related: The Lies of Genzyme

The Needs of Genzyme Outweigh the Needs of All

An Enzymatic Insult

There are other champions for these and other programs, and that might help blunt the impact of losing Kennedy. For example, research and development is a priority of President Obama. In addition, the state has a powerful delegation in the Democrat-controlled Congress. Senator John F. Kerry, in addition to serving as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, also serves on the health care subcommittee of the Finance Committee.

Related: Congressional War Contractors

How Do You Ask a Man to Be the Last to Die For a Lie, Senator?

US Representative Edward Markey of Malden is the third-ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is crafting health care reform legislation. Markey is also chairman of the subcommittee that oversees energy and telecommunications, key technology sectors in the state.

Also see:

Representative Barney Frank of Newton is the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, while Representatives John Olver of Amherst and Richard Neal of Springfield are respectively subcommittee chairmen of powerful panels: Appropriations, which crafts spending bills, and the House Ways and Means Committee, which writes tax legislation. Representative Michael Capuano of Somerville is close to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, having led her transition team when Democrats regained control of the House in 2006.

I just wanted you to see who the looters are in my state.

Oh my, my joo-controlled puke is in there.

Also related: Barney Frank Benefited From State Debts

Slow Saturday Special: Protecting Politicians

Defense Lobbyist Had Ear of Congress

The Liberal Looters of Massachusetts

The Battle For Corporate Hearts and Minds

“We will have to work very hard to do our best to fill the huge gap,’’ said Markey, the longest-serving member of the congressional delegation. “But our delegation is exceptionally well placed in the committee structure in the House and John Kerry is exceptionally well positioned in the Senate.’’

Yeah, even though we will be LOSING A SEAT in CONGRESS!!!

Kerry said the delegation will have to marshal its clout from all the panels on which its members sit, and enlist powerful allies, such as Senator Chris Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, particularly on health care issues....

That "election" must be rigged then.

It's happened before.

--more--"