See: Gay Hate Day in the Globe
Doesn't mean I am for it. I am still opposed on various levels, but I have to many other battles to fight. Just wanted to document the inordinate amount of time this issue is used by the agenda-pushing Zionists at the bottom of every issue.
"U.S. denies asylum to gay Brazilian man
The Massachusetts husband of a gay Brazilian man says his spouse has been denied asylum that would allow them to be reunited in the United States. Tim Coco said yesterday that the Obama administration did not act on a Friday deadline in the case of Genesio “Junior’’ Oliveira, thus denying his request.
Related: Slow Saturday Special: Kerry Endorses NAMBLA
Did you notice the difference in ages? I just got sick in my mouth.
Oliveira had sought asylum, saying he was raped as a teenager. His request was denied in 2002. He returned to Brazil in 2007 after losing an appeal. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In March, Senator John Kerry asked Attorney General Eric Holder to grant Oliveira asylum on humanitarian grounds. Oliveira and Coco married in Massachusetts in 2005 (AP)."
Notice the brief never mentioned the age difference?
And how many people apply for asylum every year? Must know someone at the paper.
And just stirring up more trouble:
"Gay marriage fight triggers privacy battle; Petition signers want their names kept from public" by David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times | October 26, 2009
WASHINGTON - The fierce fight over same-sex marriage is creating pressure to recognize a new free-speech right that could keep public records secret.
The US Supreme Court voted last week to block release of the names of more than 138,000 people in Washington state who signed petitions seeking to repeal a same-sex domestic partner law in a ballot scheduled for Nov. 3....
“What is it about democracy that these groups don’t understand?’’
Oh, I see.
When it is an AGENDA-PUSHING GROUP it is FINE to keep plugging, but if you OPPOSE the AGENDA then you DON'T UNDERSTAND!
Washington was only the latest instance in which gay-rights advocates across the country had sought to use public records to expose supporters of antigay measures.
“What is it about democracy that these groups don’t understand?’’
“We’ve put close to a million names online,’’ said Aaron Toleos, cofounder of KnowThyNeighbor.org, a Boston-based website. He said the group had posted the names on petitions seeking rollbacks in gay rights laws in Massachusetts, Florida, Arkansas, and Oregon.
When Toleos announced plans in June to do the same in Washington, lawyers for Protect Marriage Washington went to federal court to block the release. They pointed to the scorn and verbal abuse experienced by some people who gave money last year to support California’s Proposition 8 ban on gay marriage....
But they are allegedly such loving souls, right? That's the way they are always portrayed in my Zionist, agenda-pushing MSM. The Christians and the Muslims, on the other hand....
Fred Karger, founder of Californians Against Hate that organized some of the protests against big donors to the Prop 8 campaign, said his group targeted only people who contributed $5,000 or more to what gays and lesbians in the state considered an assault on their civil rights....
Why were they TARGETED at all?
See: Reason Number Three Why No One Reads the Boston Globe Anymore
EXCUSE ME? Mormonism teaches that GAYS are WELCOME!?
And on the observation in the title, whole stack of them still on the shelves at CVS this afternoon.
The Supreme Court’s intervention set off a broad debate among election-law specialists and First Amendment scholars over what is private and what is public when it comes to politics. Is signing a petition and delivering it to the government a public act, like voting on a bill in the legislature or contributing money to a campaign? Or is it more like casting a secret ballot at the polling place?
**********************
Tuesday, the full Supreme Court, with only one justice dissenting, accepted the claim - at least until the case makes its way through the courts - that the First Amendment’s right to freedom of speech includes both a right to petition the government and a right to do so in confidence.
In doing so, it reversed the Ninth Circuit and ordered the protective order to remain in effect indefinitely, an indication that the justices believe that people objecting to the release probably will prevail. “The process of signing a petition is political speech,’’ James Bopp, a lawyer for Protect Marriage, said in his appeal to the Supreme Court. This speech will be “chilled,’’ he added, if the signers of a petition are subjected to being “harassed, intimidated, and threatened.’’
It's because they rejected your pass, isn't it?
*************************
Some constitutional scholars say that signing a petition is akin to lawmakers’ votes, which usually are required to be made in public so the citizenry can monitor the progress of the laws that will govern them. But Richard Hasen, a Loyola Law School professor, noted that the Supreme Court in the past has protected civil rights groups and socialists from revealing the names of their members because of fears they could be harassed and intimidated.
They really are Zionist courts, aren't they?
(Blog editor shaking his head)
--more--"
Just keep it behind closed doors, please!
