Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Sunday Globe Special: New York Frack

"In N.Y., fracking advocates tire of wait" by Mary Esch |  Associated Press, December 29, 2013

ALBANY, N.Y. — Born of the energy crisis of the 1970s, gas driller Lenape Resources flourished in western New York for more than three decades — until the revolutionary technology that sparked the nation’s shale gas boom brought the industry to a screeching halt in New York under a moratorium now in its sixth year.

Today, Lenape has just five employees, down from 100 in years past. ‘‘Those five — we’re trying to give them work in Pennsylvania,’’ said John Holko, the company’s president. ‘‘We’re not going to be here much longer.’’

As another year closes with a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in New York and no timetable for Governor Andrew Cuomo to decide whether to lift it, drilling interests have all but given up on the state, and environmental groups are pressing for a permanent ban.

Not exactly the promi$ed land, huh? I'm not surprised the Globe didn't like it.

Advancements in horizontal drilling and fracking — which releases gas from rock by injecting a well with a mix of water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure — have yielded so much gas from the Marcellus Shale underlying much of the mid-Atlantic region that gas prices have plummeted.

As a result, the less productive vertical wells still allowed in New York are no longer in demand, Holko said.

While other states have allowed shale development even as they scramble to draft regulations, New York has had deep shale drilling on hold since it started developing new rules in 2008. Amid intense pressure from antifracking groups, Cuomo has said he wants his health and environmental commissioners to take all the time they need to decide whether fracking can be done safely.

Critics of fracking cite potential air and water contamination and disruptive industrial activity near population centers, while supporters say state regulations mitigate the risks.

At the same time, dozens of towns have enacted their own bans or moratoriums in case the state does approve fracking — although most are outside the region along the Pennsylvania border considered most profitable for gas exploration.

Some drilling proponents, including industry and landowners hoping to profit from leases, are putting up a fight in state courts over town bans and the state’s stalled regulations. The state’s highest court will decide this spring whether two town bans, in Dryden and Middlefield, are legal.

Norse Energy, the Norway-based company fighting the Dryden ban, is in the final stages of bankruptcy liquidation, having invested all its resources in New York leases it has been unable to develop. The company is now suing the state over its ban.

Membership in the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York has dropped by about 20 percent in the past year, said Brad Gill, its president. ‘‘Numerous service companies have set up shop across the border in Pennsylvania,’’ Gill said. ‘‘We’ll never get those jobs back.’’

Holko was working for an oil and gas services company in the early ‘70s when the energy crisis hit and state and federal subsidies were poured into new technologies to tap unconventional fossil fuel deposits like shale and sandstone. He worked on some experimental Marcellus Shale wells funded by the state.

‘‘That was the start of the shale revolution,’’ Holko said. ‘‘It’s just taken a long time for the industry to apply the proper technology to make it happen.’’

Even if Cuomo approves drilling, the industry is wary of investing in New York because of what Gill calls regulatory and legislative hostility.

‘‘The cost of regulatory compliance could be up to $1 million more per well than in Pennsylvania,’’ Gill said.

While companies can seek their fortunes elsewhere, prodrilling landowners won’t see any lease-signing bonuses or royalty checks if Cuomo decides against shale gas development, said Victor Furman, who heads a landowner coalition in Chenango County.

‘‘The delay isn’t hurting me financially,’’ said Furman, a retired technical writer for IBM. ‘‘But I know as a coalition leader that there are landowners who have lost homes that could have been saved if Cuomo had moved forward’’ with gas development.

But many landowners want Cuomo to ban shale gas development.

‘‘We initially leased our farm back in 2006, before we’d ever heard of fracking,’’ said Kathie Arnold, an organic dairy farmer and former Cortland County legislator. The lease expired during the state’s moratorium, to Arnold’s relief.

‘‘A lot of farmers think this can be done safely, but I don’t think the science supports that it can truly be done safely for the people that are here now and for future generations,’’ Arnold said, citing potential air and water pollution, heavy truck traffic on rural roads, and potential contamination from well casing failures decades in the future.

‘‘There’s something very wrong with the economics of farming if you have to mine your mineral resources to survive,’’ Arnold said. ‘‘That’s just not a sustainable way to keep your farm.’’


RelatedBlog Derailed By This Post 

Because of the earthquakes caused by tracking?

"Earthquakes in Okla. have scientists looking at oil wells, fracking" by Henry Fountain |  New York Times, December 13, 2013

OKLAHOMA CITY — Mary Catherine Sexton has been rattled enough. This fall her neighborhood in Oklahoma City has been shaken by dozens of minor earthquakes.

“We would just have little trembles all the time,” she said.

Even before a magnitude 4.5 quake Saturday knocked objects off her walls and a stone from above her neighbor’s bay window, Sexton was on edge.

“People are fed up with the earthquakes,” she said. “Our kids are scared. We’re scared.”

Oklahoma has never been known as earthquake country, with a yearly average of about 50 tremors, almost all minor. But in the past three years, the state has had thousands of quakes. This year has been the most active, with more than 2,600, including 87 last week.

While most have been too slight to be felt, some, like the quake Saturday and a smaller one in November that cracked a wall in Sexton’s house, have been sensed over a wide area and caused damage. In 2011, a magnitude 5.6 quake, the biggest recorded in the state, injured two people and damaged homes, some beyond repair.

State officials say they are concerned, and residents accustomed to tornadoes and hail are buying earthquake insurance.

“I’m scared there’s going to be a bigger one,” Sexton said.

Just as unsettling in a state where more than 340,000 jobs are tied to the oil and gas industry is what scientists say may be causing many of the quakes: the widespread industry practice of disposing of billions of gallons of wastewater that is produced along with oil and gas, by injecting it under pressure into wells that reach permeable rock formations.

“Disposal wells pose the biggest risk,” said Dr. Austin Holland, the seismologist with the Oklahoma Geological Survey.

Oklahoma has more than 4,000 disposal wells for tens of thousands of oil and gas wells.

“Could we be looking at some cumulative tipping point? Yes, that’s absolutely possible,” Holland said. There could be other explanations, he added.

And yet the ma$$ media screams fart mist while it's freezing.

Scientists have known for years that injection wells and other human activities can induce earthquakes by changing pressures underground. That can have the effect of “unclamping” old stressed faults so the rocks can slip past each other and cause the ground to shake.

The weight of water behind a new dam in China, for example, is thought to have induced a 2008 quake in Sichuan province that killed 80,000 people. In Australia, a 1989 quake that killed 13 was attributed in part to the opposite effect, the removal of millions of tons of coal during centuries of mining.

The practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking — injecting liquid at high pressures into shale rock — causes very small tremors as the rocks break, releasing trapped oil or gas.

Of greater potential concern, scientists say, is wastewater disposal — from fracked or more conventional wells.

Yeah, once the groundwater and aquifers are poisoned that's that. No reversing it. That's why I'm virulently opposed.

The oil and gas industry points out that many of Oklahoma’s disposal wells are in areas with no quake activity, and the practice of injecting wastewater has been going on for years.

“We’ve been doing this for a long time and it hasn’t been an issue before,” said Chad Warmington, president of the Oklahoma Oil and Gas Association.


Related: Slow Saturday Special: Die Like an Eagle 

I was right. That story died. 

Anyone for a glass of flaming water?