Serves a double purpose (I've been saving money by not buying toilet paper).
"Business Review borrows a page from itself; Harvard magazine reorganizes as industry struggles" by D.C. Denison and Johnny Diaz, Globe Staff | July 12, 2009
The Review’s readers are a powerful, affluent group: 33 percent hold chief officer responsibilities and subscribers have a $189,153 median household income. The Erdos & Morgan 2008-2009 Opinion Leader Study ranked the Harvard Business Review as the fourth most influential magazine in the world (behind the Economist, Foreign Affairs, and Nature).
“This is for the very senior executive, the real decision makers,’’ said Boston University’s Klapisch. “It’s a real tool box for the business world professional. It serves an elite audience.’’
Purvi Rajani, vice president of product marketing and strategic innovation at Cross Country Automotive Services in Medford, has been reading the magazine for five years. He said he also follows the publication on Twitter and Facebook for updates and often distributes articles from the publication to fellow employees.
F*** Twitter and F*** Facebook!
Is there NOT ONE ARTICLE that does NOT MENTION those pieces of Zionist, data-mining tools?
“It’s really a nice combination of theory and practice,’’ he said. “What I like is that I can read an article and the next day, I can put what I learn into practice.’’
In January when the magazine’s editor in chief, Adi Ignatius, a former Time magazine editor who took his post in January at Harvard Business Publishing, a not-for-profit, wholly owned subsidiary of Harvard University, an affiliate of Harvard Business School, and parent company of Harvard Business Review Group, arrived at Harvard, he said he was impressed with how the organization methodically created scenarios so that they would be prepared to deal with a variety of economic conditions, from a Scenario A, if the economic climate was in a relatively mild downturn, to a Scenario C, a severe recession.
How apropriate the editor is a Jew.
“It was a level of involvement that I never saw at Time magazine or The Wall Street Journal, where I worked before that,’’ he said, adding that “right now we’re somewhere between Scenarios A and B.’’
So says the globalist deceiver.
Does this all feel like a mild downturn to you?
--more--"Somehow, I don't think these guys will be going out of business soon -- unlike the paper occupying my desk right now!
:-)
