"US now tries to use a scalpel to fight terrorism; Stealth war intensifies in Asia, Africa" by Scott Shane, New York Times | August 15, 2010
WASHINGTON — At first, the news from Yemen on May 25 sounded like a modest victory in the campaign against terrorists: An airstrike had hit a group suspected of being operatives for Al Qaeda in the remote desert of Marib Province, birthplace of the legendary queen of Sheba.
But the strike, it turned out, had also killed the province’s deputy governor, a respected local leader who Yemeni officials said had been trying to talk Al Qaeda members into giving up their fight.
Yemen’s president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, accepted responsibility for the death and paid blood money to the offended tribes.
The strike, though, was not the work of Saleh’s decrepit Soviet-era air force. It was a secret mission by the US military, according to American officials, at least the fourth such assault on Al Qaeda in the arid mountains and deserts of Yemen since December.
The attack offered a glimpse of the Obama administration’s shadow war against Al Qaeda and its allies. In roughly a dozen countries, from the deserts of North Africa to the mountains of Pakistan to former Soviet republics crippled by ethnic and religious strife, the United States has significantly increased military and intelligence operations, pursuing the enemy using robotic drones and commando teams, paying contractors to spy, and training local operatives to chase terrorists.
The White House has intensified the Central Intelligence Agency’s drone missile campaign in Pakistan, approved raids against Al Qaeda operatives in Somalia, and launched clandestine operations from Kenya.
Not the change we wanted.
The administration has worked with European allies to dismantle terrorist groups in North Africa. And the Pentagon tapped a network of private contractors to gather intelligence about things like militant hideouts in Pakistan.
Related: Petraeus' Private Eyes
While the stealth war began in the Bush administration, it has expanded under President Obama, who rose to prominence in part for his early opposition to the invasion of Iraq.
Virtually none of the newly aggressive steps undertaken by the US government have been publicly acknowledged.
In contrast with the troop buildup in Afghanistan, which followed months of robust debate, for example, the US military campaign in Yemen began without notice in December and has never been officially confirmed.
Yemen isn't noticed much in my newspaper anymore.
Obama administration officials point to the benefits of bringing the fight against Al Qaeda and other militants into the shadows.
So which "Al-CIA-Duh" would that be, huh?
The made-up "Al-CIA-Duh?"
Related:
Prop 101: Al-CIA-Duh and the OSI
Prop 101: Al-CIA-Duh's Greatest Hits
Prop 101: The "Terrorism" Business
New York Times Admits War on Terror is U.S. Creation
Oh, the NYT KNOWS ALL ABOUT it and yet STILL PUSHES the CHARADE, huh?Afghanistan and Iraq, they said, have sobered American politicians and voters about the staggering costs of big wars that topple governments, require years of occupation, and can be a catalyst for further radicalization across the Muslim world.
Yeah, so KEEP it ALL QUIET and maybe they WON'T NOTICE!
Instead of “the hammer,’’ in the words of John O. Brennan, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, America will rely on the “scalpel.’’
In a speech in May, Brennan, an architect of the White House strategy, used this analogy while pledging a multigenerational campaign against Al Qaeda and its extremist affiliates.
Yup, NEVER-ENDING WARS over LIES!
Yet such wars come with many risks: the potential for botched operations that fuel anti-American rage; a blurring of the lines between soldiers and spies that could put troops at risk of being denied Geneva Convention protections; a weakening of the congressional oversight system put in place to prevent abuses by America’s secret operatives; and a reliance on authoritarian foreign leaders and surrogates with sometimes murky loyalties.
The administration’s demands have accelerated a transformation of the CIA into a paramilitary organization as much as a spying agency, which some critics worry could lower the threshold for future quasi-military operations.
In Pakistan’s mountains, the agency had broadened its drone campaign beyond selective strikes against Al Qaeda leaders and now regularly obliterates suspected enemy compounds and logistics convoys, just as the military would grind down an enemy force.
Along with innocent men, women, and children.
The Pentagon is becoming more like the CIA. Across the Middle East and elsewhere, Special Operations troops under secret “execute orders’’ have conducted spying missions that were once the preserve of civilian intelligence agencies.
Or ASSASSINATIONS, readers.
Doesn't the MSM sanitizing make it sound so benign?
Such programs typically operate with even less transparency and congressional oversight than traditional covert actions by the CIA.
This from the TRANSPARENT PRESIDENT of CHANGE!
What a f***in' a**hole!!
As American counterterrorism operations spread into territory hostile to the military, private contractors have taken on a prominent role, raising concerns that the United States has outsourced some of its most important missions to a sometimes unaccountable private army.
That is the way empires behave.
And it is a WORLD WAR NOW, isn't it?
Yemen is a testing ground for the scalpel approach Brennan endorses.
I'm sure the MURDERED Yemenis are very grateful they are a f***ing EXPERIMENT!
Some American officials believe that militants in Yemen could now pose an even greater threat than Al Qaeda’s leadership in Pakistan.
Yeah, but the PtB are not going to waste a a LIVE terror drill, 'er, event on that strip of dirt.
The officials said that they have benefited from the Yemeni government’s new resolve to fight Al Qaeda and that the US strikes had been approved by Yemen’s leaders.
Cui bono?
The strikes, US officials say, have killed dozens of militants suspected of plotting future attacks.
How are they liking the CIA's accommodations?
--more--"
