But no, they continue to lie about this, lie about the wars, lie about the economy, lie about the environment, and when they are not lying the stories are presented in such an obfuscated, divisive, agenda-driving way they make one sick to read them.
"With advisers, Obama rejects showing photo of bin Laden; Says picture would not sway skeptics" by Mark Landler and Mark Mazzetti, New York Times / May 5, 2011
WASHINGTON — The president’s decision came after a brief but intense debate in his war council....
Even as the White House decided against providing visual evidence of bin Laden’s death, new details emerged of his final moments early Monday on the top floor of a fortified house in Pakistan, cornered by a Navy SEAL assault team....
Related: CONFIRMED - IT WAS PAK FORCES WHO ATTACKED THE COMPOUND IN ABBOTTABAD
Also see: "the president was watching"
Related:
"A dramatic photograph showing Obama and his team watching special forces soldiers attack Osama bin Laden's Pakistani hideout on a TV monitor may be just another political photo op to prop up a failing president, according to White House critics. The TV screen was blank during the entire operation, according to Panetta."
White House and mouthpiece media really selling those lies hard, huh?
Senator Scott Brown duped by bin Laden photo
What a pathetic attempt to spin the photoshopped s*** put out by the government and try to convince the world it is the the truth-telling web that is not credible.
Also see: Military looks into 'psy-op’ charge; Story says senators were manipulated in Afghanistan
Senators get duped a lot, huh?
This account differs from an official version of events issued by the Pentagon on Tuesday and read by the White House spokesman....
Translation: They were CAUGHT TELLING LIES!!!
The administration also concluded that most people viewed the reports of his death as credible and that publicizing photos would do little to sway those who believed it was a hoax...
The scale of delusion is rather frightening coming from that high up.
The deliberations were reminiscent of Obama’s decision in May 2009 to fight the release of photos documenting the abuse of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan by US military personnel. He decided he would fight making them public after his military commanders warned the images could provoke a reaction against troops in those countries....
As if invading, occupying, and killing them has not.
Seeking to quell any legal questions about the raid, Attorney General Eric Holder said, “It was justified as an act of national self-defense,’’ citing bin Laden’s role as the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
This is the same AG that said waterboarding was legal?
Why did they have to kill him when he was loaded with information they could have tortured out of him?
--more--"
"Records provide insight on bin Laden
Sorry, the page you have requested does not exist at this address.
- If you are trying to reach a Boston.com page from a bookmark, the address may have changed, or the page may have been eliminated. Please use the sections above to browse for what you're looking for, or visit our home page.
- You can find articles by using the search box above, or by going to our Search page.
- If you need immediate assistance, please visit our Help Center or contact us by filling out our feedback form.
-- Your friends at Boston.com
I guess the Globe doesn't want you to have that insight.
"Property records give new insights into bin Laden" by Zarar Khan and Nahal Toosi, Associated Press | May 5, 2011
Property records obtained by The Associated Press on Wednesday show....
I'm just wondering why we should believe them.
U.S. officials have identified the courier as Sheikh Abu Ahmed, a Pakistani man born in Kuwait who went by the nom de guerre Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti. They obtained his name from detainees held in secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe and vetted it with top al-Qaida operatives like Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
They tortured it out of him.
The man who periodically ventured outside bin Laden's compound with the suspected courier is believed to be his brother. American officials said the courier and his brother were killed in the American commando raid on the compound early Monday.
The courier was so important to al-Qaida that he was tapped by Mohammed to shepherd the man who was to have been the 20th hijacker through computer training needed for the Sept. 11 attacks, according to newly released documents from Guantanamo Bay interrogations.
The Wikileaks garbage backs up the official story of 9/11?
The courier trained Maad al-Qahtani at an internet cafe in the southern Pakistani city of Karachi in July 2001 so that he could communicate by email with Mohammed Atta, the Sept. 11 financier and one of the 19 hijackers, who was already in the United States.
But al-Qahtani proved to be a poor student and was ultimately denied entry to the U.S. when he raised suspicion among immigration officials.
Whatever.
--more--"
Related: Pakistani military launches an inquiry on hide-out
That's what replaced it on the Globe's censorship shell game known as its website.
Obama Bin Lyin'
The US authorities claim they shot an unarmed, defenseless Osama Bin Laden in what can only be described as an act of cold-blooded murder -- then threw his body in the ocean. This story is not only an insult to Muslim sensibilities, it's an insult to the intelligence of anyone who hears it.
Why wouldn't they make every effort to take Bin Laden alive in order to glean potentially crucial information, then put him on trial? And if they had screwed up and killed him, why wouldn't they keep his body around long enough to satisfy a skeptical world -- and then have it buried according to Muslim custom, in order to avoid reprisals by millions of angry Muslims?
Also see: Rejoicing over death of bin Laden debated
Not at the Globe: Globe Editorial May the rejoicing go on
I suppose a lying, war-criminal, mind-manipulating media would feel that way.
Why wouldn't they make every effort to take Bin Laden alive in order to glean potentially crucial information, then put him on trial? And if they had screwed up and killed him, why wouldn't they keep his body around long enough to satisfy a skeptical world -- and then have it buried according to Muslim custom, in order to avoid reprisals by millions of angry Muslims?
Also see: Rejoicing over death of bin Laden debated
Not at the Globe: Globe Editorial May the rejoicing go on
I suppose a lying, war-criminal, mind-manipulating media would feel that way.
MORE OF THE LIES COLLAPSE - Osama's Million-Dollar Hideout? More Like $250K
No Proof Has Been Offered Suggesting That The Official Osama Bin Laden Death Narrative Is Even Remotely True
White House PSYOP Script Falls Apart
Osama's Death Turned America into the Laughing Stock of the World
Related:
Osama bin Dead Again
Bin Laden Buried at Sea
Today's Globe All About bin Laden
No Longer Digging Up Dead Men
Can't now; U.S. dumped him into the sea in a final insult to Islam.
