Monday, October 6, 2008

Perverted Physicians Seek Destruction of American Families

"So how do pediatricians handle this challenge? The one-on-one approach is used with teens as young as 11, to establish a zone of privacy and confidentiality that they can build on in the following years, when they may need help with contraception, sexual identity, drug use, or other sensitive matters.... It can be a tough sell to persuade... that talking privately is, ultimately, in everybody's best interest."

Yeah, SEPARATING KIDS from their PARENTS is ALWAYS a TOUGH SELL!!!!!


BRAINWASHING NEVER COMES EASY!!!!

And btw, doc, an 11-YEAR-OLD is NOT a TEEN!!!!!!!!!


Also see
: The School Crotch Inspector

You SICKOS STAY AWAY from OUR KIDS!!!!

"Doctors walk fine line on teen pregnancy" by Victoria McEvoy, M.D. | October 6, 2008

When we heard Jamie Lynn Spears, the sibling of Britney, was with child at age 16, we shrugged; just another Hollywood event, we said to ourselves. When word leaked out that Bristol Palin, daughter of the Republican vice presidential nominee, is pregnant, we tut-tutted. "So much for abstinence teaching," we said. Probably more than a few mothers let out a "there but for the grace of God go I" sigh.

Please read: The Good Girl Again, Palin Family Picture Proves Pregnancy and Daily Kos Fascists EXPUNGE and BAN the blogger ArcXIX for Sarah Palin's Babygate

Thank you.

Teenage pregnancy is hardly a surprise any more. The teen pregnancy rate in the United States is among the highest in the industrialized world, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the wake of a spate of teen pregnancies at Gloucester High, the school committee is debating whether to have contraception available on the premises. Noted one teen in favor of the change, "Gloucester is sexually active." The same could be said for most any suburb.

I love the girls of Gloucester! They should be CELEBRATED, not condemned!!!!

Seems that teen pregnancies are not a problem for the agenda-pushing Zionist War Daily -- unless the girls are good Catholic girl that are most likely anti-abortion!

Can't ever get away from the Zionist agenda-pushing, can you, BG?!

Also see: My Abortion Evolution

(P.S. Other bloggers noted earlier that AmeriKan MSM would try to bring up during presidential campaign, and here it is!)

So how do pediatricians handle this challenge? There is no set script. Each physician brings his or her own set of values, training, and religious principles to practice, and each has a different set of priorities for the 15 or 20 minutes of an adolescent visit.

The one-on-one approach is used with teens as young as 11, to establish a zone of privacy and confidentiality that they can build on in the following years, when they may need help with contraception, sexual identity, drug use, or other sensitive matters.

This is an ideal approach, but in today's complicated world, problems can arise. First of all, many parents are not comfortable being shut out of the exam room. "This is my child, and I darn well want to know what is going on," is the view of some.

The IMPLICATION from this SICK PHYSICIAN is that the PARENT is being UNREASONABLE!! Makes you want to AVOID DOCTORS altogether.

Often the pre-pubescent teen may want the comfort of a parent in the room. Some adolescents are still joined at the hip with their mother or father, and balk at sharing personal information with anyone else. It can be a tough sell to persuade such a family that talking privately is, ultimately, in everybody's best interest.

The other unfortunate problem with giving an adolescent private time with a doctor is the chaperone issue. Doctors are acutely aware that they are vulnerable to charges of sexual impropriety if any sensitive discussion or physical exam is done without a third party witness. A simple breast exam can be misconstrued by a sensitive or paranoid teenager - or by her parents. Each doctor has their own response to this situation. Usually, we assess the risk based on the relationship with the family. In situations where complaints seem likely, or teens prefer it, parents are invited to stay in the room.

Excuse me? What the HELL are you doing with YOUR HAND on my DAUGHTER'S BREAST (after which I lay you out on the floor), sicko!??

Even with the guarantee of confidentiality, many teens will not directly admit to sexual activity. Odd complaints about irregular periods and acne may prompt a request for birth control pills - which are indeed sometimes prescribed for those conditions - when the real need is to avoid pregnancy. Even those teens who can raise the issue do so indirectly, heading out the door at the end of an exam by asking, "Oh, by the way, do you know where I can get the pill?"

Another problem is - perhaps predictably, in this dollar-conscious age - the billing issue. While Pap smears are no longer required before prescribing a birth control pill (the new guidelines from the Academy of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend a Pap smear within three years of onset of sexual activity or age 21, whichever is first), sexually active teens - both boys and girls - still need to be screened for sexually transmitted diseases. Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening can now be done by a urine test, but a parent still may receive a bill for the test.

This is a TWO-FER! You not only get INTO the KIDS PANTS and PARENT'S WALLETS, but you get their with the ACCLIMATION to TYRANNY!!!!

And if teens have multiple partners, they may need a pelvic exam to screen for human papilloma virus. Parents receiving a bill for these tests may rightfully inquire about why these tests were done.

FUCK YOU, sickie!!!!!! Kill all the PERVERT doctors, too!!!!

Of course, pediatricians encourage adolescents to discuss their sexuality with parents if possible. After all, the parent-doctor-adolescent triad is not meant to be a conspiracy but a team. But many parents have a hard time accepting the sexuality of their children.

Yeah, it is ALL the PARENTS FAULT!! Nothing about the DIVISIVE ROLE of the AGENDA-PUSHING JEW MEDIA!!!!

The importance of these exam room conversations is underscored by findings on the failure of the abstinence programs promoted in many schools. A Mathematica Policy Research Inc. study funded by Congress and released last year found that abstinence programs for older elementary students and middle schools had no effect in reducing rates of teen sexual activity - and that teens in the program were no more likely to delay their first sexual experience than other teens. That leaves parents and physicians to guide teens about the best, and safest, approach to sexuality.

:-) GOOD!!!!!!!! CELEBRATE LIFE and LOVE while you can, kids, because it can vanish in an INSTANT!!!!

We need to face the facts - our kids are having sex. Adding to the urgency of this crisis is the fact that girls are getting their periods earlier; the average age now is 12.5 years - almost five months earlier than in 1988, according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination.

First of all, THAT CARD has been SO PLAYED (Patriot Act, Iraq, FISA, bailout)!!!

And secondly, WHAT are the DEMONS of MEDICINE doing to our kids?!!

And for some girls, of course, it arrives even earlier. Just ask the mother of the 11-year-old girl who came to me for missed periods, and whose pregnancy test came back positive. --more--"

I'm sorry, readers, but I just simply do NOT BELIEVE this AGENDA-PUSHING SICKO!!!!

And if this is true, WHO is the FATHER?

What PERVERT would FUCK an 11-year-old?

See: Jews in the American porn industry