You will NEVER be getting my vote!
Related: Outing the Gay Agenda
Video: Is the Gay Agenda, a Zionist NeoCon One?
"Mass. is 1st to fight US marriage law" by Nandini Jayakrishna and Jonathan Saltzman, Globe Correspondent | Globe Staff | July 9, 2009
Massachusetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, yesterday became the first to challenge the constitutionality of a federal law that defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman, contending that Congress intruded into a matter that should be left to states....
And YET you get HATEFUL GAYS MARCHING into UTAH and boasting they will make New England a sanctuary for same-sex marriage despite the will of the people!!!
The suit filed by state Attorney General Martha Coakley says the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 violates the US Constitution by interfering with the state’s right to define the marital status of residents....
You know, if this WERE ACTUALLY ABOUT CIVIL and HUMAN RIGHTS I wouldn't mind; however, it is ALL ABOUT AGENDA-PUSHING POLITICS!!!!!
Massachusetts risks losing millions in dollars for MassHealth, the state’s Medicaid program for the poor, and for veterans’ cemeteries overseen by the state Department of Veterans Services, unless it obeys the Defense of Marriage Act. The federal government has told the state that it cannot provide federal funding for MassHealth benefits given to same-sex spouses. It also informed the state it will lose Veterans Affairs funding if it buries the same-sex spouse of a veteran in a cemetery, as the state does for heterosexual spouses of veterans.
Yeah, THANKS for SERVING the AGENDA-PUSHING S***TERS, AG!
Yesterday’s lawsuit fueled speculation that Coakley is courting liberal Democrats in preparation for a bid for a more prominent office. Coakley has been mentioned as a possible successor to Senator Edward M. Kennedy if he is unable to finish his term because of brain cancer, and to Governor Deval Patrick if he changes his mind and decides not to seek reelection....
Arline Isaacson, cochairwoman of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, said Coakley had shrewdly used a traditionally conservative argument - states’ rights - to challenge the federal law.
I'm not the only one who has noticed:
"This list shows the extreme concentration of a particular political power base in respect of the gay movement and who is behind it."
But C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League, said the suit reflected the “rather callous hypocrisy of a state government which refused to allow the people of Massachusetts to vote on the definition of marriage now complaining that the federal government is intruding upon its rights of self-government.’’
Hey, HYPOCRISY is SECOND NATURE to MASSACHUSHITTS LIBERALS!!!
