By now everyone knows Wikileaks is an Zionist propaganda front (they ceaselessly appear in my paper thus meaning they are part of the agenda).
How interesting that Pakistan was next on the list after Iran.
"Pakistan proves a vexing ally for US; Cables detail their complex relationship" by Jane Perlez and David E. Sanger, New York Times / December 1, 2010
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan —Written from the US Embassy in Islamabad, the cables reveal American maneuvering as diplomats try to support an unpopular elected government that is more sympathetic to US aims than is the real power in Pakistan, the army and intelligence agency....
That's odd; I live in a country with an unpopular elected government more sympathetic to the aims of Israel, and the real power in my country is the very same agencies (as well as Wall Street banks).
Overall, the cables portray deep skepticism that Pakistan will ever cooperate fully in fighting the full panoply of extremist groups....
The highly enriched uranium that Ambassador Anne Patterson wanted removed came from the United States in the mid-1960s.
Say wha....?
In those days, under the Atoms for Peace program, little thought was given to proliferation, and Pakistan seemed too poor and backward to join the nuclear race.
That's racism!!
--more--"
Also see: Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison
Wikileaks "Cablegate" Psychological Operation Justifies Zionist War Propaganda
Wikileaks and Imperial Mobilization
That did seem to be the end result of the things.
