Charlie Hebdo is rife with the choking hypocrisy that has become commonplace in the post 9/11 world
Million Moron March
Charlie Hebdo Publishing Prophet Cartoon On New Cover
“Je suis brainwashed”
CHARLIE HEBDO - DRAMATIC PICTURES
The Charlie Hebdo Mossad False Flag Attack: This Single Video Shows Proof Positive It Was A Hoax!
Yeah, turns out the whole thing was a staged and scripted hoax of Hollywood proportions.
"Kosher market attack deepens fears among European Jews" by Colleen Barry, Associated Press January 13, 2015
I heard Germany was still awash in swastikas.
MILAN — The killing of four French Jews at a kosher market in last week’s attacks by Islamic extremists in Paris has deepened the fears among European Jewish communities shaken by rising anti-Semitism and feeling vulnerable because of poor security and a large number of potential soft targets.
Honestly, I've had it with this slop.
In the wake of the attacks, which follow deadly strikes on a Belgian Jewish Museum and a Jewish school in southwestern France, Israeli leaders have called on European Jews to immigrate to the Jewish state. But European Jews are deeply ambivalent about leaving, and their community leaders, along with top politicians, have urged people to stay.
“The European Jewry is the oldest European minority, and we have our experience of surviving under all possible circumstances,” said Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress. “We will not give up our motherland, which is called Europe. We will not stop the history of European Jewry, that is for sure.”
(Cue somber cello music)
Kantor called for increased security at Jewish sites, concerted action against anti-Semitism across the continent, and better coordination of intelligence forces against religious extremism. But he acknowledged that if any Jewish European does not feel safe, “I say you should leave in this case.”
Many French Jews already are. Last year, 7,000 emigrated to Israel as anti-Semitism spiked across France, fed by tensions with the country’s large Arab population after the outbreak of Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. That was double the previous year.
That's the total opposite of the tune the NYTs was singing, but so what?
Officials in Israel are expecting — and encouraging — a new influx after the Paris siege. Since last week’s attacks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has encouraged European Jews to move to the Jewish state.
This propaganda scheme is absolutely reeking at this point.
“You have the full right to live in safety and tranquility as citizens with equal rights wherever you wish, including here in France,” Netanyahu said at the Great Synagogue of Paris on Sunday. “But Jews of our time have been blessed with another right, a right that did not exist for previous generations of Jews: the right to join their Jewish brothers and sisters in our historic homeland.”
In Khazaria?
In an interview with Israel’s Channel 10 TV, Johan Dume, one of the hostages who hid inside a freezer at the kosher market for five hours during the hostage-taking, said he would now move his family of four children to Israel.
“We are not going to wait around here to die,” he said.
This is really disgusting stuff.
Overall, immigration to Israel was up 88 percent from Western Europe in 2014, with the arrival of 8,640 immigrants compared with some 4,600 in 2013, with surges also from Italy, Belgium, and Britain, according to the Jewish Agency.
Historians say European Jews have not felt this threatened since World War II, when some 6 million Jews were murdered in the Nazi Holocaust.
There they go again with the magic number full of inflation.
Researchers at Tel Aviv University monitoring anti-Semitism have reported a chilling increase in attacks in Europe over the past decade, including deadly shootings in Toulouse, France, in 2012 and Brussels last year. In recent years, France has had the highest number of incidents of any single country.
See: Hard Proof Brussels Jewish Museum Shooting is a Staged Israeli Hoax
For many of Europe’s 2 million Jews, the mood after the Paris attacks was one of tense vigilance amid increased government security and additional personal precautions.
The rise in anti-Semitism in Europe is occurring at a time of greater resistance
Kind of interesting, isn't it?
Why would Islamists attack France of all nations?
In the eastern German state of Saxony, anti-immigrant protests have been growing by the week, drawing global attention and fears that xenophobia is on the rise again in the country, where the Nazi past has long made such sentiments taboo.
A weekly anti-Islam rally in Dresden drew its biggest crowd yet Monday, after organizers declared it a tribute to the victims of the terror attacks in Paris. Organizers said 40,000 people participated in the march, while police put the figure at more than 25,000 people — still considerably more than the 18,000 who came last week.
The group, which calls itself Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West, had asked supporters to wear black ribbons as a show of respect for the 17 people killed in France. The group’s critics, including Germany’s mainstream parties, have accused it of exploiting the attack to stir up race hatred.
After the massacre in Paris, heightened security measures, visible and non-visible, were swiftly put into place at Jewish places of worship, study, and business across Europe. Security officials and Jewish leaders in Italy, Britain, Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Austria confirmed increased surveillance of vulnerable sites.
Many Jews are also taking their own precautions: An Israeli mother of three, who has been living in Berlin for several years, said she no longer allows her children to talk in Hebrew outside the home.
“When we are outside, I tell my kids to only speak English. I’m too afraid that somebody will recognize that we are Jewish or Israeli and then harm us,” said the woman, who did not want to give her name out of fear.
I'm tired of the self-serving whining and crying of Zionist Jews.
--more--"
Related: The Charlie Hebdo Shooting HOAX: WHY Are The French And British Suddenly Giving Special Treatment To The Jews ONLY?
I wasn't the only one noticing.
"White House agrees absence in Paris a mistake" by Julie Hirschfeld Davis, New York Times January 13, 2015
WASHINGTON — The White House, facing a barrage of criticism for President Obama’s decision not to attend Sunday’s peace march in Paris, said Monday that a higher-ranking US official should have participated for the show of solidarity.
“It’s fair to say that we should have sent someone with a higher profile to be there,”
Asked his response to critics who say a person with more prominence than the US ambassador to France should have attended, he said: “We agree.”
They then unbuttoned Israel's pants....
But Claudine Ripert-Landler, the head of communications for President François Hollande of France, said Obama had not snubbed the march. “President Obama supported France in their common struggle against terrorism,” she said Monday, adding that Obama’s visit to the French embassy was “a rather exceptional gesture.”
“Mr. Obama’s attentions have been very important to Mr. Hollande,” she said.
Earnest declined to say whether the president had considered attending the march himself or sending Vice President Joe Biden or to detail the conversations that led to the decision not to do so. But he cited scheduling and security concerns as playing a part.
“The security requirements around a presidential visit, or even a vice presidential visit, are onerous,” Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said at his daily briefing with reporters at the White House, said, noting security would have had to secure a large outdoor area, potentially making it harder for other people to attend. “It would have been very difficult to do so without significantly impacting the ability of common citizens to participate.”
I pointed that out, but there all those world leaders were in the front of they line.
What a STENCH of a COMPLETE AGENDA-PUSHING HOAX!
He also said, “We’re talking about a march that came together with essentially 36 hours’ notice.”
It takes a LOT LONGER THAN THAT to scout an OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT VISIT for ANYONE!!!!!!
The US ambassador to France, Jane D. Hartley, participated in the rally. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. was in Paris on Sunday for an antiterrorism meeting, but he did not participate in the march.
That is what all this is about: cracking down on the people who disagree with or object to government orthodoxy.
The absence of Obama or any other senior US official in the wake of the shootings of 17 in attacks last week at the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo and at a kosher supermarket prompted questions from Republican lawmakers and some foreign policy analysts.
Those questioning the lapse said there should have been a prominent US leader on hand for the most striking show of solidarity in the West against Islamic extremism since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
This is OVER THE TOP, JUMP THE SHARK shit!!!
Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, took to Twitter to criticize the president. “Obama declining to show solidarity with over three million in France is beyond crass, even for this administration,” he wrote.
This is the big debate in Washington, huh?
Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, a potential presidential candidate, called Obama’s absence “symbolic of the lack of American leadership on the world stage, and it is dangerous.”
In an opinion piece posted on Monday by Time magazine, Cruz wrote: “Our president should have been there, because we must never hesitate to stand with our allies.”
Yeah, Globe agrees: Obama let France down
Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday he would travel to Paris on Thursday as a gesture of respect for the victims and support for the French government’s fight against terrorism.
After he is done hanging around in Pakistan.
Kerry, who is traveling in India and Pakistan, said that after he heard about plans for the Paris rally, he asked his staff when was the earliest he could get to France. “I really think this is sort of quibbling a little bit,” he said of the criticism.
Speaking Monday in Gujarat, India, Kerry said he had been unable to attend because of his prior commitment there but that he would visit Paris on his way home “to make it crystal clear how passionately we feel about the events that have taken place there.”
“I don’t think the people of France have any doubt about America’s understanding of what happened, about our personal sense of loss, and our deep commitment to the people of France in this moment of trial,” Kerry said....
--more--"
"At a glance: How governments respond to extremist threats" Associated Press January 13, 2015
The threat of Islamic extremism has justice officials around the world trying to balance tougher law enforcement against the need to protect civil liberties.
Australia
■ A new law bars Australians from traveling to places the foreign minister declares to be terrorism hot spots, unless they provide a legitimate reason for visiting. Only one hot spot has been declared: the Syrian province of al-Raqqa, an Islamic State movement stronghold.
■ The foreign minister has canceled more than 70 passports of Australians suspected of fighting in Iraq and Syria or attempting to do so, and recently gained the power to suspend passports quickly.
■ It has also become easier for authorities to obtain court orders restricting terror suspects’ movements and people they associate with.
■ Another new law bars anyone who discloses information related to ‘‘special intelligence operations,’’ a secret category defined by the attorney general.
■ The country plans $510 million in new spending to enhance security over the next four years, including a rollout of biometric screening at airports.
Canada
■ Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government plans to introduce legislation to strengthen antiterrorism laws, possibly by making it easier to make arrests and detentions.
■ The government is also considering giving the Canadian Security Intelligence Service greater flexibility in tracking terror suspects abroad.
Europe
■ France ordered 10,000 troops on Monday to protect people at particularly sensitive locations. Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said 4,700 security forces would be assigned to protect France’s 717 Jewish schools.
■ Counterterrorism intelligence efforts in western Europe have become more challenging as an increasing number of mostly young Muslims travel to Syria to join forces with the Islamic State and other militant organizations fighting there. Each country uses a different system to keep track of suspected extremists.
■ Britain took unilateral steps last week to tighten up its border checks at seaports and train stations.
■ Spain raised its terror threat level, not because of a specific plot, but because of a general sense that all of Europe was at heightened risk. Spain also stepped up security at transportation hubs like airports and train stations, nuclear power plants, energy networks, and water sources.
OMG! Every single government in Europe is in on this fraud!
United States
■ The FBI, the lead federal law enforcement agency in counterterrorism investigations, is permitted to maintain demographic data on communities within the United States — a process known as mapping that has disquieted some civil liberties groups.
But they aren't spying on you.
■ US counterterrorism capabilities include National Security Agency surveillance programs that sweep up phone records and allow the government to collect communications of non-Americans located outside the U for counterterrorism purposes.
And yet they can't catch the hackers, the perverts, or the thieves.
■ The United States also maintains a no-fly list that bans suspected terrorists from air travel. As of late summer, the list had roughly 48,000 names, including those of the brothers suspected in the Paris attack.
■ The New York Police Department has disbanded its demographics team assigned to create databases on where Muslims lived, shopped, worked, and prayed. A review of the unit found that the same information could be better collected through direct contact with community groups. The department still uses Muslim informants.
Meaning NOTHING HAS CHANGED despite the UPROAR!
--more--"
Related: 6 Paris terror subjects may still be at large
Also see: France must fight anti-Semitism
If Islamists were in charge of newsrooms
This whole propaganda campaign has literally been a cartoon.
And what if Zionists were in charge of newsrooms, huh?
Six Zionist Companies Own 96% of the World's Media
Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed
Operation Mockingbird
Why Am I No Longer Reading the Newspaper?
No wonder it all looks and sounds like nonsense.
Blue eyes, suicide, left my ID in my ride
Welcome to our world
Of course, it is the norm for "senior editors of our mainstream media" to tell us barefaced lies. It is their job.
Now it ALL MAKES SENSE!
"France, Israel lay victims of terror to rest; Bulgaria holds man who may be tied to attacks" by Alan Cowell and Maïa de la Baume, New York Times January 14, 2015
The lead AmeriKan liar!
PARIS — It was a day of mourning and defiance, of brave words and of choking sadness.
In Israel, four Jews, killed in Paris on Friday, were buried; a solemn-faced President François Hollande said, “They died so that we may live in freedom.”
Yes, “all of France shares your pain.”
As France and Israel buried the victims, the authorities intensified efforts to find associates of the extremist gunmen.
They "confirmed an arrest since Jan. 1, nearly a week before the attacks, on a second warrant that did not specify how or provide evidence tying him to any specific terrorist attack. Even so...." !!!!!!!
In France, the National Assembly approved an extension of the military campaign against Islamic extremists in Iraq by a vote of 488-1 in favor, with 13 abstentions. The Assembly also paid homage to the 17 people killed in the attacks....
Oh, WHAT a STENCH!
Prime Minister Manuel Valls also called for tighter surveillance laws, including closer scrutiny of imprisoned radicals, and warned France not to let down its guard.
Valls said he would propose legislation within days to more closely monitor Internet and social media sites — a contentious issue here and in many parts of Europe.
That is what is at the bottom of this prop op.
He called on the European Parliament to adopt counter-terrorism measures.
“We cannot lose any more time,” he said.
Yup, it's urgent!
On Monday, French authorities had announced an extraordinary deployment of more than 10,000 military personnel and thousands of police officers to guard sites, including transportation hubs, major buildings, and Jewish schools.
Something is going down, folks -- like the implosion of the economic system and WWIII.
--more--"
Also see:
"Ireland is one of few European nations with a blasphemy law on the books (Germany and Denmark are two others), and like those countries, the law is not enforced anymore. The last known case in Ireland was in 1855."
Un-f***ing- sigh!
Related: "Terrorist attacks" in France designed to perpetuate "Global War on Terror"
And they are doing just that, in overdrive!
"Reprisals feared as Charlie Hebdo publishes new cartoon" by Dan Bilefsky, New York Times January 14, 2015
PARIS — Immediately upon unveiling its new cover — a depiction of Mohammed— the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo Tuesday re-inflamed the debate pitting free speech against religious sensitivities that has embroiled Europe since 12 people were killed during an attack on its Paris offices by Muslim extremists a week ago.
That is a fake debate so that governments can now limit free speech in the name of saving free speech.
The cover shows the bearded prophet shedding a tear and holding up a sign saying, “I am Charlie,” the rallying cry that has become synonymous with support of the newspaper and free expression. Above the cartoon on a green background is the headline: “All is forgiven.”
The insults never end, huh?
Although surviving staff members, at an emotional news conference, described their choice of cover as a show of forgiveness, most Muslims consider any depiction of their prophet to be blasphemous. Moreover, interpretations quickly swirled around the Internet that the cartoon also contained disguised crudity.
I'm not surprised, especially after looking at it closely.
One of Egypt’s highest Islamic authorities warned that the cartoon would exacerbate tensions between the secular West and observant Muslims, while death threats circulated online against staff members.
A preacher, Anjem Choudary, the former leader of a radical group that was banned in Britain, was quoted by Britain’s Independent newspaper as saying that the image was “an act of war” that would be punishable by death if judged in a shariah court.
Beyond new threats — and the potential for more violence after a week in which both mosques and Jewish sites were attacked — the persistence of what many in the Muslim community see as continuing provocations opened complaints about a double standard in European countries, whose bans on hate speech some see as stopping short of forbidding ridicule of Islam.
Yeah, I didn't see the French security forces protecting mosques, did you? It was only all the Jewish areas!
“If freedom of expression can be sacrificed for criminalizing incitement and hatred, why not for insulting the Prophet of Allah?” Choudary wrote last week on Twitter on the same day as the massacre at Charlie Hebdo, during which the attackers indicated they were avenging Mohammed for the newspaper’s insults.
Supporters of the iconoclastic newspaper defended the cartoon as a fitting and defiant tribute to its slain cartoonists.
Have you SEEN what they are defending?
*************
“The people who did this attack, they have no sense of humor. I’m sorry we’ve drawn him yet again,” the cartoonist who drew the cover, Renald Luzier, told assembled reporters at the offices of the newspaper Libération, “but the Mohammed we’ve drawn is a man who is crying.”
Laurent Léger, an investigative journalist with Charlie Hebdo, shrugged off the idea, circulating on social media, that the cartoon contained one or even two hidden renderings of male genitals. “People can see what they want to see, but a cartoon is a cartoon,” he said. “It is not a photograph.”
EXACTLY! It's DRAWN by SOMEONE!
Muslim leaders as far away as Egypt condemned Charlie Hebdo, recalling threats received by a Danish newspaper in 2005 after it, too, published cartoons satirizing Mohammed.
Elsa Ray, the spokeswoman of the Paris-based Collective Against Islamophobia in France, declined to react specifically to the new cartoon, but said cartoons that lampooned Mohammed breached the limits of decency and insulted Muslims.
“The freedom of expression may be guaranteed by the French Constitution, but there is a limit when it goes too far and turns into hatred and stigmatization,” she said.
That is usually when it becomes a jew$paper.
Moreover, she argued that the failure of French courts to clamp down on cartoons satirizing Mohammed was a double standard, given the robustness of action taken when cartoonists or artists insulted Jews, including Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, a comedian of French and West African heritage, who in 2013 came under the scrutiny of courts that banned a series of his shows.
Related: Big Fuss Over French Funnyman
M’bala M’bala has said it was a shame that a Jewish journalist had not been killed in the gas chambers. He has also come under fire for popularizing an inverted Nazi salute.
Did he really say that?
In a statement on his Facebook page after Sunday’s enormous unity march in Paris, M’bala M’bala expressed his admiration for Amedy Coulibaly, the gunman behind the killings at a kosher supermarket. “As far as I am concerned, I feel I am Charlie Coulibaly,” he wrote, alluding to the “I am Charlie” rallying cry. The Paris prosecutor’s office said Monday it had opened an investigation to determine if M’bala M’bala should be charged with promoting terrorism.
Then this guy is a French agent provocateur or complete asshole.
Related: French Comic Arrested for Defending Terrorism
M’bala M’bala said that he was being unfairly targeted.
See: Paris, où est la liberté d'expression?
Good question.
Though French laws safeguard the freedom of speech, the protections do not go as far as those in the United States.
Prime Minister Manuel Valls told the National Assembly on Tuesday that “blasphemy” was not in French law and never would be. But he refused to draw any analogy between the satirists of Charlie Hebdo and M’bala M’bala. “There is a fundamental difference,” he said.
YUP!
Persecuted French revisionist scholar: Charlie Hebdo Before and After
'Free speech' and 'hate speech'
Islamophobia Allowed, Anti-Semitism Not
That's the "fundamental" difference.
--more--"
Related: Al Qaeda Takes Credit for Paris Massacre
I can believe that!
CIA behind Paris attack?
CIA Flashback: “We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False.”
'Jihad Jane': I Became a Terrorist for Love
Oh, I love propaganda!
Turkish President’s Stunning Outburst: The French Are Behind The Charlie Hebdo Massacre; Mossad Blamed
I think everyone in the world who is paying attention to something other than the Jewish propaganda knows that.
I wanted to finish with this outstanding work today:
"The Charlie Hebdo False Flag in Paris: Theory, Evidence and Motive
Stuart J. Hooper
21st Century Wire
The following essay looks to present a theory of false flag terrorism in relation to evidence and motives present for the case of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris, France.
Don’t want to read this long piece? Listen to an audio presentation of this article here.
Introduction
One must preface this piece with a short statement on its intentions. The shooting that took place in Paris is a tragedy of immense proportions, ruining the lives of many people, leaving a scar on French history and threatening the ideals of freedom of expression. This writer is not concerned with theories of a hoax where nobody was killed, nor the potential involvement of Reptilians, and would prefer to leave such ideas firmly behind; in favour of those which actually have supporting evidence. This piece is interested in presenting a theory of false flag terrorism, which has occurred numerous times throughout history, in parallel with evidence that can support such a theory and also show a motive for such actions. It is only through reasoned and well argued analysis that alternative theories can hope to gain ground in the mainstream consciousness. That being said, it is not possible to present any idea, official or otherwise, without some degree of subjectivity and speculation. However, the epistemological concern should be with the weight and relevance of the evidence invoked towards the case, not positivistic absolutism, and only you, the reader, can be the judge of that.
Theory
The theory of false flag terrorism we will be exploring here is that of Dr. Webster Griffin Tarpley, which can be found in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA. This theory suggests that four key aspects are required for the successful execution of a false flag terror operation.
1) Patsies, dupes and useful idiots
- These are the people which you will see on the front pages of newspapers and on the evening news as those allegedly ‘responsible’ for the attack. They can have the will to perform terroristic actions, but usually are of low mental ability lacking the means and technical capabilities to do so. In some cases they will think that they are carrying out an attack, but it is also possible for patsies to not be aware they about to be framed. They must be under a level of supervision, yet free to fulfil their role.
2) Professional executioners
- These are the actors that have the means and technical capabilities to perform terroristic actions. They usually have to be unseen, at least personally although their actions will not be, throughout the entire false flag event. This allows them to shift blame upon the useful idiots at a later point.
3) Privatised command structure
- This is the ever illusive shadowy element of false flag terrorism. The instigator and bankroll. Neither seen nor heard of, and can be tricky to specifically identify.
4) Controlled corporate media
- Through means of monopolised ownership and coercion, a controlled corporate media is required to immediately espouse the story of the useful idiots, not professionals, being responsible.
In short, the privatised command structure employs the use of professional executioners and technicians, for whatever motive they have, to instigate a terroristic incident. Following this, a patsy is placed on the scene sometimes materially sometimes rhetorically, and immediately blamed, often with zero evidence and by an unnamed source, as being the perpetrator. The controlled corporate media will then run with this version of events as factual, whether it is or not, and sometimes even seek to discredit ideas to the contrary. What we must now attempt to do is see whether any evidence and facts from the Charlie Hebdo shooting points to the presence and operation of patsies, professional executioners and a privatised command structure.
Evidence
Our first point of enquiry comes from the accused perpetrators allegedly being Muslims. This led to the event being declared “an act of Islamist terrorism, as the attackers shouted, ‘Allahu akbar’”. The Foreign Policy article goes on to state that the attackers “were captured on video shouting Islamist slogans and claiming they had attacked the paper to avenge the Prophet Muhammed“. Although this is what was seen and heard, it does not mean that this is what you were seeing. Anyone can shout “Islamist slogans“, whether they are Islamic or not, and, as the attackers were disguised behind masks we cannot assume that they were indeed the Islamic extremists we are being told they are. Now, remember the role of the professional executioners and technicians is to carry out the event and help to place blame upon the patsy to blamed later on. The use of such slogans can, therefore, be seen as evidence of an attempt to frame an Islamic patsy and steer the subsequent narrative in the direction of Islamic extremism; away from any other potential source of terrorism, which could have otherwise been plausible [1].
This attempt at steering the narrative was furthered once more by a ‘claim’ allegedly being made by a representative of the group al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in Yemen. The problem here is, once again, that this was “provided on condition of anonymity“. It also did not come immediately after the attack and the delay was apparently “due to the executors’ security reasons”, which seems somewhat dubious [2]. Anonymous sources should, in this writer’s opinion, always be held in a skeptical regard. Their usage in situations such as this one can be dangerous, placing blame upon those who may not necessarily be responsible. The U.S. government has since taken a similar stance, itself suggesting that there is “no credible information” that an al-Qaeda group was actually behind the attacks [3].
Evidence of the alleged perpetrators being patsies, dupes and useful idiots does exist. We are informed by an AP article that one of the accused, Cherif Kouachi, was “a former pizza deliveryman” and had already been arrested back “in 2008 for trying to join up with fighters battling in Iraq“. As an employee in a position that requires little intellectual ability, combined with failure in previous terroristic attempts, we can suggest that Cherif Kouachi fits the definition of a potential patsy; as he demonstrates low mental ability and a will, but lack of means and capability, to perform terroristic actions [4]. We have also learnt that one of the alleged perpetrators was wrongly accused. The supposed getaway driver, 18-year-old Mourad Hamyd, was “in class”; leading to a Twitter campaign by his classmates, which you can find under #MouradHamydInnocent [5]. This demonstrates the potential for failures, deliberate or not, to occur; which may not only be limited to this one suspect.
Yet, what we see on the streets of Paris are men who are described as anything but incapable in the actions which they undertook. “Masked and garbed in black, the AK-47 wielding assassins appeared to be executing a well-coordinated plan in the late-morning raid, methodically seeking out and executing those targeted for death, and making a clean getaway“. That is how Fox News details the event. Their analyst, retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, said “it was evident immediately that this was a carefully planned, sophisticated operation by well-trained, well-armed veterans of jihad. This was not a pick-up team. These butchers were methodical and efficient. They weren’t just terrorists: They were terrorist commandos”. Peters elaborates and states “they didn’t just go nuts and shoot wildly, as amateur jihadis do. They set out to kill specific people and never lost focus. They even stayed cool during the getaway phase. These men had killed before”. Furthermore, Scott Stewart, vice president of tactical analysis at global intelligence firm Stratfor, also told Fox News, “these are not amateurs. Especially when you compare it to the deadly, but amateurish lone wolf attack on Oct. 22, 2014 in Ottawa. These men were working as a fire team” [6]. Moreover, Aki Peritz, a former CIA analyst, stated that the attacks were “very professional, well thought out and well executed“; also suggesting it is significant that, apart from the police, nobody other than the targets were killed [7]. Lt. Col. (Ret) Anthony Shaffer suggested in an interview on Fox and Friends that the perpetrators’ arsenal of weapons indicates evidence of vast “logistical support” , which is in turn evidence of a privatised command structure [8]. This collection of analysis does not corroborate with the profile we have of at least one of the alleged perpetrators, particularly as he had failed to even come close to killing before, and instead points to the presence of highly professional executioners; of utmost importance for successful false flag operations.
So, why then did such ‘professionals’, obviously concerned with concealing their identities due to their wardrobe choices, leave behind an ID card in their getaway car? This can be framed as a mistake, a framing we find in an article from the UK’s Mirror stating “the suspected terrorists have been identified after one of the brothers left his ID card in the Citroën C3 they abandoned as they escaped” [9]. Could it be a mistake? Sure. But consider the analysis presented above. The professionalism and potential for advanced ‘logistical support’ suggest that the ID card story could fit in with a bigger picture. It bears striking similarity with a story that broke on 9/11, where “the passport of one of the hijackers” was discovered. This story makes literally zero sense, as in the same report it is stated that “when the two airline jets crashed into the twin towers, thousands were vaporised almost instantly; consumed in the burning jet fuel” [10]. How then did a passport survive? Both stories suggest a deliberate attempt to plant false evidence, considering the near improbability of these events happening by chance, framing patsies, not the real perpetrators, for these crimes.
Incredible acts like these are usually found in false flag operations, yet the controlled corporate media usually refuses to address such events; instead choosing to parrot, and never question, the official story that is fed to them. We find further incredulous acts through reports stating that the alleged attackers “had been listed in databases for years” [11]. They “were both logged in the US government’s Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) system“, meaning they were also both on the notorious U.S. “No Fly List” [12]. Moreover, the “two brothers accused of the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris have been on a British watch list for the last four years“, “to deter them from entering the UK or transiting through a British airport” [13]. This might explain why “French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said Thursday that the suspects were “probably followed” prior to the shooting” [14]. If true we therefore find evidence of potential handling, a process of supporting and guiding someone for specific means and ends; often employed by intelligence agencies and police when they ‘handle’ an asset. It makes sense that such well known ‘potential terrorists’ would be followed on a regular basis, so, assuming it was them, why were they not stopped? It would have been obvious where they were heading and their outlandish actions on the streets of Paris do not allow for a defence of ‘confusion’ as to what was going on. This is strong evidence of patsies having their freedom maintained to carry out, or at least be able to blamed for, an operation; necessary for successful false flags. It is also evidence of the privatised command structure necessary, as people were keeping track of the potential patsies.
The fact that one of the alleged attackers apparently trained with al-Qaeda in Yemen might explain their presence on so many international terrorist watch lists. “Said Kouachi, 34, was in Yemen for a number of months training with Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula“, so perhaps at least one of the suspects may have had some of the technical skills necessary to carry out the event [15]. Assuming then that it was the brothers at the crime scene and not covert professional executioners, we could suggest a merging of the roles of patsy and professional; but still a false flag event nonetheless. This is because, as evidenced above, we still have the existence of a private command structure in the supply of the weaponry and tailing of the suspects prior to the event.
Now this is where things get really suspicious; potentially tearing apart the argument in the previous paragraph of this analysis. We are now told that Cherif, not Said, conducted an interview over the phone “to BFM-TV before his death while holed up inside the building“. In this interview, he said: “I was sent, me, Cherif Kouachi, by Al Qaeda of Yemen. I went over there and it was Anwar al Awlaki who financed me” [16]. Yet, we heard above that it was Said who was in Yemen. So who really was in Yemen? This, once again, appears to be an attempt to frame a patsy. What was stated explicitly identifies someone who had, apparently, previously undertaken efforts to disguise their identity with the use of a mask and quick getaway, which is an obvious inconsistency. The fact that the wrong name was used also raises suspicions as to the true origins of this phone call. Is this perhaps more evidence of the privatised command structure working to feed the controlled corporate media with its story? How did this television station get in contact with the suspects? What evidence, aside from claims of the station, do we have that this phone call is legitimate? It is interesting that the name Anwar al-Awlaki was mentioned too. This figure was invited by the Pentagon “to a luncheon just months after the 9/11 attacks“, supposedly to “to ease tensions with Muslim-Americans after the terror attacks” [17]. According to our analysis here, we can instead suggest that this too is evidence of handling. To what extent was al-Awlaki involved with military intelligence in the future? Did he receive funding, training or assistance of any kind under the guise of ‘easing tensions’? Involvement with such a figure casts further doubt onto the authenticity of the Paris attackers.
Motive
As keen investigators we should always look for specific and relevant motives, which avoid vast and vague sweeping ideas, to ensure both heightened credibility and potential for our work. First, let us contextualise the current geopolitical situation. Anglo-American hegemony is on the decline due to vast, perhaps terminal, financial crises, and measures attempting to rectify this situation, austerity in particular, appear to failing on all fronts; especially as we now how have an anti-austerity party, Syriza, poised to come to power in Greece and reject the IMF. The IMF is an institution favoured, owned and operated by the Anglo-Americans for purposes of financially seizing countries throughout the world; through a process of destroying the capabilities of the state, under ‘structural adjustment’, and then burdening the country with exorbitant amounts of debt effectively leading to the IMF ‘owning’ the country. This decline of Anglo-American hegemony, and rejection of their methods, is putting these waning Western powers into a difficult position. Of course it would be possible for them to accept that their time as the dominant force on the world stage was coming to an end but, alas, we see a mad scramble to sustain hegemonic power at any cost; particularly through actions to destabilize the Middle East in favour of Western interests, attempts to portray Russia as a threat to Western liberal international order, and, even attempts at starting a new regional war through destructive clandestine operations in Ukraine. It is this stance of desperation that makes the Western powers unstable and, in turn, incredibly dangerous.
However, not all Western leaders agree with the stance of desperation. In an “unprecedented two-hour interview with France Inter radio“, French President Hollande took it upon himself to address the world situation as dire and in need of immediate change. Hollande said, “Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine“, putting him at odds with an entire narrative Western, NATO governments have been pushing relentlessly for months on end. He went past these rhetorical insinuations, of takeover desires, into hard reality stating that “the sanctions (against Russia) must stop“, which can be seen as a direct challenge to the already declining Anglo-American financial hegemony. Furthermore, he “ruled out unilateral military intervention in Libya“, where we heard above the West has been attempting to shift the balance of power in their favour; something that is much harder to accomplish without direct Western intervention. Hollande suggested that such an intervention would only include France under a “clear mandate, clear organisation and the political conditions” necessary for legal and international, not unilateral, action.The French President also spoke of the situation in Greece, mentioned above, saying “the Greeks were free to choose their own destiny“, and warned “not to interfere with the Greek election“. This “has been interpreted as a swipe at German Chancellor Angela Merkel“, as it once again directly challenges the West’s financial hegemony [18]. So, what we have here is a Western leader directly challenging all of the points of desperation described above; a move which demands respect from those of us also against such practises. This undoubtedly places a target upon the back of Hollande and provides motive for a false flag event, which acts as a warning to the French government to stop acting in such a conflicting manner or expect to face consequences far worse than what was seen at Charlie Hebdo.
The interview was a full-on assault against Western policy, as Hollande stated “I’m not for the policy of attaining goals by making things worse” [19]. If Angela Merkel was angered, it is certainly possibly for others within the Western power structure to have also felt that way. So is the suggestion above, of a false flag occurring after such an assault on Western policy, possible? Yes. This can termed geopolitical terrorism. It is not the view of the mainstream, which ascribes terroristic actions to the supposedly oppressed who are fighting back, violently, against their oppressors. This is an incredibly naive view of the subject of terrorism, and ignores the countless incidents of terrorism being used for geopolitical purposes throughout history. Operation Gladio was a component of a NATO stay-behind operation aimed at preventing any assaults upon Western anti-communism policy in Europe during the Cold War. It did this by supporting radical right-wing groups by utilising “terror attacks and shootings in public venues to later be blamed on leftist and socialist groups” [20]. Here we have a concrete, undeniable example of terrorism being used to achieve the geopolitical aim of preventing attacks upon Western policy objectives. So, we are left with a situation where it is not inconceivable that the events of Paris may too have been acts of geopolitical terrorism; to prevent a rebellious Hollande from attacking almost all global, Western policy aims. The President of France has much wider powers than say the American President, with the ability to dispel parliament, which makes Hollande a real threat to Western norms as he could begin to work outside of them and against them; making his divisive rhetorical stance a reality. A desperate Anglo-American power structure can not afford such a challenge. Was this event their attempt at preventing it?
Conclusion
From the analysis presented here, we can point to numerous pieces of evidence supporting a theory of flag terrorism being applied to the events in Paris. There exists evidence of patsies, professionals and a privatised command structure. We have also looked at inconsistencies within the official story, which only add further suspicions. But, as stated at the beginning of this piece of work, only you the reader can decide if the evidence that has been invoked in this case is adequate to support the theory. This writer would argue that it is. The motive provided here has been presented within a larger framework of current geopolitical realities, which again, in this writer’s opinion, only strengthens the case for a potential false flag. Remember, just because geopolitical terrorism is not the mainstream view of terrorism, does not mean that it is not the correct interpretation of terrorism; for many years, a mainstream view existed that said the Earth was flat.
As a parting thought, let us consider the power that an intelligence agency wields over a government. The agency is, usually solely, tasked with informing the government of threats and in turn safeguarding the citizens of said country. Imagine the potential for abuse here. To what extent should a government trust an intelligence agency? How can a government know when a threat is truly credible? Is a pledge of allegiance enough to place such high levels of trust in an intelligence agency? How can we ever assure proper oversight of organisations that regard secrecy as the order of the day? Is it possible to provide any check or balance upon such an organisation? Surely, a cunning, albeit criminal, leadership in an intelligence agency would recognise this position of immense power which they occupy and use it to their advantage. Calls for expanded powers and enhanced funding for intelligence agencies to prevent terrorism from occurring, only places more power into the hands of these already questionable organisations. The time may now be right for a complete overhaul of the intelligence world, perhaps along the lines suggested by President John F. Kennedy:
“I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds!“
--MORE--"
Also see: Mockingbird Fail: CNN ‘Reporter’ Chris Cuomo’s Calls French Terrorist ‘African-American’, Before CIA Handler Steps in to Correct Him
