And that The Boston Globe Knows About "Al-CIA-Duh"
Nevertheless:
"Rules of engagement with Iran" by H.D.S. Greenway | March 10, 2009
RECENTLY, John Bolton, United Nations ambassador under George W. Bush, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal in which he argued that any outreach to Iran would be useless, and that regime change was the only answer - a neo-conservative voice from the grave of failed policies and bad ideas.
As they used to say in fifth grade: "You and whose army?" The US military is stretched a bit thin to contemplate invading Iran, and all the covert actions in America's black-ops bag couldn't unseat the regime. This isn't 1953 when Kermit Roosevelt and the CIA could oust Iran's leader and bring back the shah.
So the ZIONIST WAR DAILY KNOWS about all the FALSE-FLAG BLACK-OPS S*** -- and STILL THEY PERSIST with the PROPAGANDA? How REVOLTING!!!!
Related: Operation Ajax
U.S. Government Harbors Terrorist Jundallah
P.J.A.K.
Iranian airliner shootdown
M.E.K.
Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran
"[An] act of terrorism, means any activity that (A) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State; and (B) appears to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping."
"The hope that Iranians will blame their own government for their hardships, and that their complaints will influence the regime"
Are we CLEAR?
The LEAST you could do, 'bamer, is CALL OFF the AMERICAN TERRORISTS!!!!!!!
A protégé of former vice president Dick Cheney, Bolton was undersecretary of state for arms control and proliferation when the tentative Iranian offer to make a deal on all that divided us was rejected in the we-don't-talk-to-evil days - one of the many missed opportunities to strike a deal with Iran. In the other corner are some thoughtful diplomats who tried to keep open some back channels to Iran through the long night of the Bush-Cheney administration. Among them are Frank Wisner, a former ambassador to Egypt and India; Tom Pickering, former ambassador to Israel, Jordan and Russia; and William Luers, former ambassador to Czechoslovakia and Venezuela.
They argue that, although we can make it hot for the Iranians, we cannot impose our will. To attack them would be a folly that could have untold negative consequences throughout the region and beyond. Instead we should engage Iran on many levels at once. Iran has no interest in seeing the return of the Taliban to Afghanistan. Nor does Iran have a long-term interest in an unstable Iraq, especially now that President Obama is winding down the war....
He's winding down what? Pfft!
***************
Only by finding mutual points of shared interest, by showing respect for Iran as a civilization with centuries of tradition, and by recognizing that it has legitimate security interests as a regional power, can we get anywhere.
Although some maintain that Iran is riding high and that we have little leverage, Wisner points out that, from Iran's point of view, it has great vulnerabilities. There are American armies on its eastern and western frontiers. It faces both covert action and sanctions on its economy.... From Iran's point of view it is America's fist that is clenched....
How RARE it is to see the TRUTH in a Zionist war promotion.
Of course, it's FLEETING!!
--more--"
I would like to remind Mr Greenway and the rest of the world that:
"Iran had stockpiled 1,050 pounds of low-enriched uranium so far.... It would need 3,740 pounds to convert into high-enriched uranium, or HEU, for fueling an atom bomb --source--"
That:
"Iran would have to change the way the centrifuges are operating to enrich uranium to high, weapons-grade levels, something that would be difficult since the Natanz facility is under IAEA video surveillance --source--"
That:
"specialists question the conclusion by those providing the intelligence... They note that the spent fuel at issue is not enough to yield the approximately 65 pounds of weapons-grade material needed for a bomb. Iran's enrichment program under constant IAEA monitoring has churned out material that is less than 5 percent enriched, in line with the fuel needs of modern reactors --source--"
That:
"There are some indications, moreover, that the MEK obtained the documents not from an Iranian source but from Israel's Mossad --source--"
Clear now, readers?
