I'd think he was a rank, fetid turd anyway because of his glib hypocrisy regarding the banks and the bailout, the lying s***-sucker!
First, a FLASHBACK:
"Frank believes laws aiding transgenders to pass soon
Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, one of a handful of openly gay members of Congress, says he believes that Congress will soon pass laws protecting transgender people from hate crimes and granting them benefits.
They CAN'T GET OVERSIGHT WRITTEN INTO the LOOTING BILLS, but they have TIME for THIS, huh?
Also see: Barney Frank Benefited From Bailout Bill
Nice of that scum-shit Frank to use his influence to help his lover, 'eh?
He also said that he's hopeful that President Obama this year will overturn the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gay members of the military.
Sorry, Barn: Obama F**** Gays
But he told the website gay365.com that he doubts that the law defining marriage as between a man and a woman will be overturned. And Frank said he doesn't believe the Supreme Court will declare the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, either, using a harsh description of Justice Antonin Scalia.
"I wouldn't want it to go to the Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia's got too many votes on this current court," Frank said in a remark first reported yesterday by the political blog of USA Today.
Yeah, you see, it is OKAY of GAYS DENIGRATE and DISPARAGE PEOPLE!! That is a DOUBLE-STANDARD if I've ever seen one!!! Fuck them!!
Actually, I take that back!!!
Also, Frank said the attention he is getting on the economic crisis as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee helps the gay community because his personal life has not been a "hindrance" to being trusted by the president and others. "It is helpful," he said.
No it doesn't, Barn!!!
This is the tolerant, loving, equal-rights, gay club that will respect others?
"Protest organizers said they hoped to tone down the anger that has characterized some previous demonstrations"
What, ANGER, INTOLERANCE, and HATRED at a GAY PROTEST?
Related: Gays Get After Mormons
Btw, if gays have a complaint, why don't you take it to the BLACK CHURCHES? From what I heard, they voted 70-30 FOR the BAN!!! How come the gay rights folks only have it in for the Mormons? Or why don't you go after Hispanics, who voted FOR the ban by 53-47? In fact, one wonders HOW the VOTE could have been so CLOSE -- although one does not wonder long in the land of rigged elections.
And before I get charged with being some sort of bigot for opposing the wishes of the divisive, globalist agenda-pushers, reflect upon this...
"The Role of Feminism in the New World Order"
"What do factory workers, women, blacks and homosexuals in Western societies have in common? They all used to have reasons to feel discriminated against. What else do they have in common? Their grievances have been addressed and largely resolved as the result of intense pressure by mostly Jewish intellectuals, media and liberal politicians. Shouldn’t we all be grateful for their effort? Isn’t it proof that Jews are actually making this world a better place? Of course there is nothing wrong with addressing legitimate grievances of parts of society who are unfairly discriminated against. Factory workers shouldn’t be exploited and worked to death. Women and blacks shouldn’t be refused equal rights because of gender or colour of skin. And homosexuals shouldn’t have to fear being bashed for being homosexuals.
One of the most difficult things to get our heads around though is the fact that the driving forces behind fixing those grievances did so for all the wrong reasons. The same masterminds and their puppets who pretended to care so much about the plight of the disadvantaged had no qualms about bringing death and misery upon them for their selfish financial and political gains. What they really were interested in is dividing society and turning us against each other like roosters in a cockfight..... --more--"
I am MORE THAN WILLING to meet halfway! I'm not happy about it, as my state has signed off on gay marriage; however, I ACCEPT IT! As a wiser man than me once said:
"The issue would revert to the states, where it constitutionally belongs.... anyone expecting perfection in this world is going to be consistently disappointed.... "
There are so may other issues to worry about; why is this making my divisive, Zionist-controlled, agenda-pushing War Daili... oh, never mind.
"Frank explains why he called Scalia a homophobe
WASHINGTON - Representative Barney Frank yesterday defended his use of the term "homophobe" to describe Antonin Scalia, the conservative Supreme Court justice who has ruled in favor of limiting legal protections for gays.
"What a 'homophobe' means is someone who has prejudice about gay people," Frank told WBZ radio, arguing that Scalia's judicial writing "makes it very clear that he's angry, frankly, about the existence of gay people."
I don't care; I just don't like their agenda being shoved, 'er, jammed, 'er, well, you know what I mean.
A Supreme Court spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment from Scalia.
Why should he waste his time?
In particular, Frank cited Scalia's opinion in the 2003 case in which the Supreme Court struck down state laws barring consensual acts of sodomy. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the 6-to-3 vote served to ratify an "agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct."
Scalia may be a dink, but he's right there!
Explaining the characterization of Scalia he made in an interview with a gay news website, Frank argued that Justice Clarence Thomas, who joined Scalia's dissent, had a "very reasonable" opposition to the ruling. "While I support same-sex marriage, I don't think if you're against it you're homophobic," Frank said on WBZ. "I don't think Clarence Thomas is homophobic."
No, because THEN the HYPOCRITE could be accused of RACISM!!!
