Thursday, November 12, 2009

Day of Division in the Boston Globe

Only agenda-pushing reason to bring the issue up again and again, isn't it?

"The House bill bars a new government-run insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother being in danger, and prohibits any health plan that receives federal subsidies in a new insurance marketplace from offering abortion coverage. If women wanted to buy abortion coverage through such plans, they’d have to buy it separately.

The outcome has put Obama and Democratic leaders - already struggling for consensus on the complex and politically tricky health measure - in a tough spot....

Ever notice the Zionist paper is always blaming or picking on the Catholics for some reason or another?


--more--"

And I know this is going to a jolt to you feminists out there, but take it easy, you get used to it after a while.


"Obama.... told ABC News this week that he was not looking to “change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions.’’

Ha-ha-ha-ha!

What was his campaign theme again?

Oh, ladies!


--more--"

You know,

“.... My guess is [Obama].... has
never worried about missing a period.’’

Now that is a TERRIBLE ARGUMENT for abortion rights!

Yup, ADMITTING that it is JUST a BIRTH CONTROL METHOD for the MORALLY IRRESPONSIBLE!!!!!!!

Related: Barriers to abortion rise, even in Brookline

Also see
: Slow Saturday Special: American People Are Pro-Life

Abortion: The Kosher Slaughter

What is a Person?

And my position on the issue, as distasteful as I find the procedure, from here in liberal Massachusetts:

"The issue would revert to the states, where it constitutionally belongs.... anyone expecting perfection in this world is going to be consistently
disappointed.... "

Also see:
The Left Doesn't Care About Life

Yeah, that didn't garner the SAME CONCERN or CONDEMNATION from the PRO-ABORTION MSM, did it? No bias there!