Thursday, November 26, 2009

Obama Continues the ClimateGate Lie

Watch and listen for two minutes first: Lied To On A Monumental Scale

I've never been more dejected in my life about the AmeriKan MSM and the Boston Globe -- a paper I've read for over twenty years.

I mean, I expect the lies about war and the omissions and concealment of Zionist Israel; however, when they LIE about the WEATHER.... !!!!!!!!


"Obama to take emissions cuts to Copenhagen; Move expected to aid faltering climate talks" by Juliet Eilperin and Michael D. Shear, Washington Post | November 26, 2009

WASHINGTON - The White House said yesterday that President Obama will attend international climate talks next month in Copenhagen and commit the United States to a specific short-term target for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, providing new momentum for negotiations that had been faltering.

Obama will travel to the Danish capital on Dec. 9, one day before he visits nearby Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. His decision to attend - and for the first time, commit to an emission reduction target “in the range of’’ 17 percent below 2005 levels - prompted an outpouring of support from the environmental community and its Democratic allies, and it drew criticism from GOP opponents.

The White House called Obama’s decision “a sign of his continuing commitment and leadership to find a global solution to the global threat of climate change.’’

Yeah, even though it is ALL a LIE!!!!!!!!!!!

Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John F. Kerry, who is working to fashion a bipartisan compromise with Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, said the administration’s decision to put specific goals on the table at the UN-sponsored talks amounts to “a global game changer with big reverberations here at home.’’

Related: Kerry's Clout

Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, a main sponsor of the climate bill the House passed in June, called Obama’s decision “a powerful statement that the US is back, ready to lead the world.’’

Related:

"Markey, the dean of the delegation, has taken eight congressional trips abroad since 2005, some in his capacity as chairman of a select committee on global warming.

Oh, GALLIVANTING around the Globe, 'eh, Ed?

THAT can NOT be good for the CARBON FOOTPRINT!!!!

But Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, the top Republican on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said Obama’s attempts to “save’’ the global warming talks would not play well back home. “I suspect most Americans would rather our president focus on our American economy and help put Americans back to work,’’ Inhofe said.

YUP -- especially TEMPS have been DECLINING since 1998!!!!!

--more--"

Updates:

"Climate Change Legislation Would Slow Economy, Says Congressional Budget Office

"Another Prominent Scientist Calls CRU Scientists "Criminals"

A prominent scientist has called for criminal prosecutions to be brought against the UN affiliated scientists involved in what has been termed "ClimateGate".

"Not just the scientists, but the NON-scientists who signed the grant checks and pulled the media strings. Al Gore, for one. And the people who swung his Academy Award and his Nobel Peace Prize for another." -- Wake the Flock Up

Oh, I remember! I remember coming out of the theater thinking powerful film. It wasn't until a year or so later I found out it was all bulls***!

Climate change will affect insurance

Climate change scandal deepens as BBC expert claims he was sent 'cover-up' emails a month before they went public The controversy surrounding the global warming scandal today deepened after a BBC correspondent admitted he was sent the leaked emails more than a month before they were made public.

"Climategate and the “T”-word

We all know the “t”-word. Our President has used it many times, as did former UN Secretary General Annan. It’s – all together now – transparency. Now the “t”-word is promised us in almost every campaign by politicians (and mega-bureaucrats like Kofi) and never delivered, so we’re used to looking at it with a jaundiced eye from them. But scientists, scientists, they are the big brains, the honest ones, the ones who, unlike cheap pols, work for eternity, like Galileo, Copernicus, Einstein.

Anyway, they were, until Climategate came along. Here from the Steve McIntyre’s Climate Audit blog is a breathtakingly short and simple illustration of the values of Dr. Phil Jones, Director of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, from whence all these emails and documents concerning global warming have been lifted.

Phil Jones, Dec 3, 2008:

About 2 months ago I deleted loads of emails, so have very little – if anything at all.

Phil Jones, Nov 24, 2009 Guardian

We’ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU.

Oops. Forget the “T”-word. How about the “P”-word (prevarication)? Or the “BFL” word (big fat liar)?

Now look – I want to be clear. I don’t necessarily disagree that anthropogenic global warming is a danger. I’m beginning to doubt it, but I certainly don’t know. What’s clear, however, is these scientists at CRU don’t know (or aren’t so sure) either. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been so guarded, so deceptive, with their data (what remains of it) for so long. They would have been transparent and shared the data with the skeptics if they were so sure they were right. It’s the scientific thing to do, as we all learned in grammar school, if you’re serious about the truth.

But thus far our President and his crew, not to mention our friends at European Union and the UN, are going along as if this download never happened. It’s full steam ahead to Copenhagen:


The United States, under pressure from other nations as one of the world’s largest greenhouse-gas polluters, will present a target for reducing carbon dioxide emissions at next month’s climate conference in Copenhagen, Obama administration officials said Monday.

The development came as the European Union urged the United States and China to deliver greenhouse gas emissions targets at the long-anticipated summit, saying their delays were hindering global efforts to curb climate change.

What’s confusing here is that we all agree – or most of us- that pollution is bad. What we don’t agree on, now more than ever, is the role of AWG, which is increasingly mysterious the more you read these documents. As Charlie Martin shows us, it’s not just the emails, it’s the data itself that is corrupt. We don’t know what we know. But the world is poised to spend untold billions or trillions on that basis....

(btw, check out the Guardian interview with Jones: “Some of the emails probably had poorly chosen words and were sent in the heat of the moment, when I was frustrated. I do regret sending some of them. We’ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU. I would never manipulate the data one bit – I would categorically deny that.” Hint to Jones: Never use the word “categorically.” It’s a dead giveaway.)

--MORE--"

"Climategate: MSM Writers Try to Ignore Scandal in Global Warming Stories But Readers Bring Them Back to Reality"

by P.J. Gladnick

November 24, 2009

An hilariously bizarre situation is happening in the wake of the growing Climategate scandal. Many of the mainstream media stories about global warming are simply pretending it doesn't exist. Perhaps they feel that by ignoring Climategate entirely that it will just go away. Unfortunately for them, the readers of these global warming stories keep bringing up the inconvenient truth of Climategate by mentioning the scandal in the comments section over and over and over again.

An example is this Houston Chronicle editorial which asserts in its headline, "As a crucial climate change conference nears, more evidence of a warming globe." And as the editorial reveals its "evidence," note what is conspicuously missing although the readers will bring it up much to the embarrassment of the Chronicle....

--MORE--"

Related: Comments

Also related: Global Warming Meltdown

Saving Time With the MSM