"Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort; Presses forward with little to no GOP support" by Susan Milligan, Globe Staff | November 17, 2009
WASHINGTON - David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, referring to Sarah Palin, former governor of Alaska, and her supporters:
“Right now, the energy in the party comes from the ‘Palinistas’ who basically threatened retribution against anyone who cooperates or tries to play a constructive role.’’
Leave to a *ew to confuse the situation.
Almost sounds "terrorist," doesn't it?
Of course, that explains the press treatment Sarah gets.
Also see: Snubbing Sarah
Just wondering where the feminists are to defend her rights.
Democrats argue that some Republicans are not just fighting over policy, but also challenging the legitimacy of Democratic control of Congress. Republicans boycotted a watershed Senate committee vote this month on climate change legislation and unsuccessfully tried to stop Democrats from talking on the House floor during the health care debate.
Just because THEY HAVE the BALLS to USE the RULES that YOU NEVER DID, DemocraPs, is no reason to attack them!
And WE WILL CHANGE that 'legitimacy" oh so soon!!!!
I HELPED PUT YOU THERE, I WILL HELP UNSEAT YOU!!!
Some Republicans have shifted their strategy against the health care bill from fighting over the details to questioning the very constitutionality of mandatory health insurance.
Oh, that would be MY GUY, wouldn't it?
But HE'S a DOCTOR and a LAWMAKER!!!!!!
Let me be the first to extend my hand to the Palinistas!
How about a PAUL/PALIN TICKET, huh?
And a few have sympathized with the so-called birthers, who continue to challenge Obama’s citizenship and legitimacy as president despite all evidence to the contrary.
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!
LOOK at them try to LINK UP THAT CRAZED BUNCH -- although the media claiming evidence to the contrary really makes you wonder!!!!
Hey, YOU DON'T FIND THAT CRAP here!!!
Go cover a UFO STORY, MSM!!!!
--more--"
And why don't you FIND SOMEONE ELSE to attack rather than a nice family!
Oprah Winfrey welcomed Sarah Palin and her daughters Piper (left) and Willow to her show in Chicago last week. Palin attributed the GOP loss in the 2008 election to a sinking economy. (George Burns/ Harpo Productions)
Is that Willow or Bristol?
Related: Oprah's Next Book
Either way, both a fine looking pair of young ladies.
"Palin continues standard establishment line on Israeli policy
Sarah Palin, Vice-presidential candidate on the GOP ticket in 2008, was interviewed by Barbara Walters of ABC News and cemented her previously stated viewpoint as a staunch supporter of Israel. With the release of her new book 'GOING ROGUE: An American Life' and chatter of a possible Palin 2012 presidential run, her view on foreign policy in particular is getting the attention of pundits and politial junkies. Palin's latest statement on Israel is nothing new, however, since her position on the matter has been clear for some time to anyone paying attention.
"Nobody is allowed to run for high office in this country without first swearing fealty to Israel." -- Wake the Flock Up
Yeah, he is RIGHT about that; however, WITHIN the ZIONIST PRISM of which AmriKan politics are played it is OBVIOUS that the ZIONIST PUPPETEERS do not like Ms. Sarah!!!
Look, I'M NOT a BIG FAN, either; however, WITHIN our AVAILABLE CHOICES....
My whole feeling is she is not one of you-know-who (rhymes with), and even those she is a Christian Zionist, we all know how the endgame of that one plays out.
When the rubber hits the road, we know where she is lining up. I think the puppeteers see her as a threat and uncontrollable -- especially in light of leaks from the McCain campaign. SHE is the one who GAVE YOU a FIGHTING CHANCE, John!
Remember, readers, McCain wanted his guardian Joe Lieberman -- who was attached to his hip during the campaign -- to be VP! That was FIRMLY REJECTED by the PARTY and for GOOD REASON!!!!
So in answer to the question, am I a Palinista, the answer is yeah, sort-of, maybe, sometimes, depending....
It's FREEDOM or FASCISM NOW and you FIND ALLIES wherever you can!
Update:
There she is again!
GOP CELEBRITY AND HER BESTSELLER - Sarah Palin autographed her new book, “Going Rogue,’’ for a customer yesterday in Grand Rapids, Mich. More than 1,000 people waited in line on the first stop of her book tour. (Bill Pugliano/ Getty Images)
Ah, she's a CELEBRITY!
You know, NO ONE to be TAKEN SERIOUSLY (good)!
I expect to see the SPORTS STARS and MOVIE STARS excised from future papers, thank you!
Oh, yeah, sorry, but I'm buying the book.
It is what we call a "non-essential outlay." Globe will be there soon.
Update: Palin Confuses Iraq And Iran In Hannity Interview (VIDEO)
Palin: Jewish Settlements Should Be Allowed to Expand, Because More Jews Are 'Flocking' to Israel
I am MOST DEFINITELY NOT a "Palinista!"
GOODBYE, GIRL!
Update:
"Army to bar coverage of Palin appearance
RALEIGH, N.C. - The US Army plans to prevent news media from covering Sarah Palin’s appearance at Fort Bragg, fearing the event will turn into political grandstanding against President Obama, officials said yesterday.Fort Bragg spokesman Tom McCollum said that the base’s commander and other Army officials had decided to keep media away from Palin’s book promotion because they did not want the Monday event to become a platform to express political opinions “directed against the commander in chief.’’ Only one politician can use that platform, “and that person does it as our commander in chief,’’ he added. Other members of the public would be permitted to attend the event. The Associated Press and The Fayetteville Observer were protesting the decision to ban media....
Oh, the press is upset about this? Not being lied to by government or anything. This.
Palin began her promotional tour this week for a new best-selling memoir, “Going Rogue,’’ with plans to travel through several states that were key to the 2008 election, hitting Michigan on Wednesday and Indiana yesterday. She doesn’t appear to be using her book-signing events to explicitly promote her politics, however.
Yeah, WHATEVER and WHO CARES?
--more--"