And the section started out so promising:
"Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate" by DAVID STRINGER
Computer hackers have broken into a server at a well-respected climate change research center in Britain and posted hundreds of private e-mails and documents online -- stoking debate over whether some scientists have overstated the case for man-made climate change.
Related: Global Warming Meltdown
Yes, my LOCAL actually PICKED UP the HUGE STORY!!!!
The University of East Anglia, in eastern England, said in a statement Saturday that the hackers had entered the server and stolen data at its Climatic Research Unit, a leading global research center on climate change. The university said police are investigating the theft of the information, but could not confirm if all the materials posted online are genuine.
The CONFIRMATION has COME!!
More than a decade of correspondence between leading British and U.S. scientists is included in about 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents posted on Web sites following the security breach last week. Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data. The furor over the leaked data comes weeks before the U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen, when 192 nations will seek to reach a binding treaty to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases worldwide....
Yeah, TURNS OUT it was a WHISTLE BLOWER on the INSIDE, not a hacker!
In one leaked e-mail, the research center's director, Phil Jones, writes to colleagues about graphs showing climate statistics over the last millennium. He alludes to a technique used by a fellow scientist to "hide the decline" in recent global temperatures.
Anyone who has spent the last several winters here knows this is true -- and the recent summer set RECORDS for LOWS!!
Related: Science Fiction or Science Fact?
I know who I'm believing!!!
Some evidence appears to show a halt in a rise of global temperatures from about 1960, but is contradicted by other evidence which appears to show a rise in temperatures is continuing.
Jones wrote that, in compiling new data, he had "just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline," according to a leaked e-mail, which the author confirmed was genuine.... The use of the word "trick" by Jones has been seized on by skeptics -- who say his e-mail offers proof of collusion between scientists to distort evidence to support their assertion that human activity is influencing climate change.
"Words fail me," Stephen McIntyre -- a blogger whose climateaudit.org Web site challenges popular thinking on climate change -- wrote on the site following the leak of the messages.
Yeah, me, too!!!
LIARS!
AGENDA-PUSHING LIARS with a MSM TRANSMISSION BELT!
It's GONE, MSM!!
Your CREDIBILITY -- what tattered remains were left. GONE!
However, Jones denied manipulating evidence and insisted his comment had been taken out of context. "The word 'trick' was used here colloquially, as in a clever thing to do. It is ludicrous to suggest that it refers to anything untoward," he said in a statement Saturday....
Uh-huh!
That is where my local cut it, which is just fine.
The University of East Anglica said in a statement that:
"[Information published on the Internet had been selected deliberately to undermine] the strong consensus that human activity is affecting the world's climate in ways that are potentially dangerous. The selective publication of some stolen e-mails and other papers taken out of context is mischievous and cannot be considered a genuine attempt to engage with this issue in a responsible way."
Translation: WE GOT CAUGHT with our pants down so HURL MUD at those who UNEARTHED IT!
And THEY ARE FINE ONES to be talking about "SELECTIVITY!"
BRAVO, Local! You DID BETTER than the Boston Globe!!!
That is, until I turned to page C9:
"Warming's impacts sped up, worsened since Kyoto"
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Since the 1997 international accord to fight global warming, climate change has worsened and accelerated -- beyond some of the grimmest of warnings made back then. As the world has talked for a dozen years about what to do next, new ship passages opened through the once frozen summer sea ice of the Arctic.
Related: Coming Soon: Climate Conflicts
???? Hmmmmm!!!!!
In Greenland and Antarctica, ice sheets have lost trillions of tons of ice. Mountain glaciers in Europe, South America, Asia and Africa are shrinking faster than before....
Yup, What do you do when you're exposed as a liar??? GET HYSTERICAL AND PUSH HARDER!!!!!!
Antarctica had a slight increase in sea ice....
SAY WHAT?
--more--"
Are you TIRED of the LIES like me because I think this is an issue I may drop unless the MSM starts printing the truth.
They didn't help their case with this:
MAUNA LOA OBSERVATORY, Hawaii (AP) -- Global warming gases are building in the atmosphere at record levels from emissions that match scientists' worst-case scenarios....
Yeah, except THEY LIE and the AGENDA-PUSHING MSM SIMPLY TRANSMITS those LIES!!!
--source--"And then there is the Globe:
A DAY LATE and TRUTH SHORT!
"Effects of warming have worsened since Kyoto; Pace around the world has accelerated" by Seth Borenstein, Associated Press | November 23, 2009
WASHINGTON - Since the 1997 international accord to fight global warming, climate change has worsened and accelerated, beyond some of the grimmest of warnings made then....
And NOTE the DATE of the PHOTO, folks!!
The polar bear is among the species threatened by the earth's changing climate. (Subhankar Banerjee/ Associated Press/ File 2003)
--more--"
Oh, had to DIG IT UP out of the ICE, huh?
Related: The Magical Polar Bear
What do you mean the polar bear population is GROWING?!
Update: Obama to offer target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions
Still NO MENTION of the CLIMATEGATE FRAUD,'eh, Glob?!
SO HOW MANY OTHER THINGS are you NOT TELLING US, agenda-pushing liars?
