You end up looking into this thing and it rolls back to the CIA, Bush administration, elements of the military-industrial complex, Israeli-firsters in the national security establishment, and a whole bunch of Zionist Jew connections at the nexus.
And yet this is the superficial lie and cover-up history will record(?).
The one we have to live with(?).
"‘Last column’ returns to ground zero" by Associated Press | August 25, 2009
NEW YORK - It became a makeshift memorial to the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks. Now a massive steel column has been returned to ground zero as a symbol of rebirth.
They check that for thermate?
Why was the crime scene destroyed and the evidence sent to China to be melted down?
After more than seven years in storage at a hangar at Kennedy International Airport, the 58-ton, 36-foot-tall beam was delivered early yesterday to the World Trade Center site.
Anyone ever sample it, or...?
A crane lifted it and placed it gently into its final resting place on the west side of the trade center site, where a museum dedicated to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks is being built.
American flags were affixed to each side of the column, which had a white protective covering.
“It’s a proud day,’’ said retired firefighter Lee Ielpi, who watched. His son, Jonathan, also a firefighter, died in the attacks, which destroyed the trade center’s twin towers....
The column is to be the centerpiece of the planned National Sept. 11 Memorial & Museum. A damaged firetruck and other large artifacts also will be brought to the museum site before the roof is built over them.
Joseph Daniels, president of the 9/11 Memorial Foundation, said artifacts like the column “take on tremendous emblematic meaning. . . . The last column represents all the effort by individuals that made this recovery effort unprecedented in American history.’’
Yup, and "as the hole in the ground grows smaller the list of 9/11 related deaths is growing longer and longer."
They told 'em it was safe, remember?
The so-called “last column’’ was the final standing steel column removed from ground zero....
--more--"
"Deadline set for 9/11 memorial talks" by Associated Press | June 6, 2009
SOMERSET, Pa. - The federal government will negotiate with landowners for one week in an attempt to get the property needed to build a Flight 93 memorial without using eminent domain, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said yesterday.
Now I know hearing isn't believing, readers, so I offer no judgment on what you have just seen or heard; however, I will offer you further testimony to terrify you.
Watch this 10 minute video: The Flight 93 Fraud
But if no agreement is reached by June 12, the government will seize the land....
See: Memorializing a Lie
Salazar said the government has a "moral obligation" to complete the $58 million, 2,200-acre memorial by the 10-year anniversary....
The government has a MORAL OBLIGATION to TELL the TRUTH and EXPOSE the TRAITORS! Failing that... illegitimate government.
And about those "emblematic meanings":
"In researching the Bush administration’s manipulation of public perceptions, I came across an interesting summary of the State Department’s Philip Zelikow, who was Executive Director on the 9-11 Commission, that greatest of all charades.
According to Wikipedia:
"Prof. Zelikow’s area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, 'public myths’ or 'public presumptions’ which he defines as 'beliefs (1) thought to be true ( although not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community.’ In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called 'searing’ or 'molding’ events (that) take on transcendent’ importance and therefore retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene….He has noted that 'a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all." ("Thinking about Political History" Miller center Report, winter 1999, p 5-7)
Isn’t that the same as saying there is neither history nor truth; that what is really important is the manipulation of epochal events so they serve the interests of society’s managers? Thus, it follows that if the government can create their own "galvanizing events", then they can write history any way they choose.
If that’s the case, then perhaps the entire war on terror is cut from whole cloth; a garish public relations maneuver devoid of meaning."
And look where we are now, nearly eight years later.
