For the sake of my home state, Massachusetts, please, please dispatch of this guy and elect Charlie Baker governor in November.
That coming from a guy who basically has given up on politics!
I will be voting though! Partly my fault Patrick is there.
I wanted Democrats in 2006 because I was naive and foolish and thought they would check Bush and end the wars and back then I bought a lot of the Zionist Globe's anti-Mormonism and bias against Romney.
My apologies, Massachusetts!
"Patrick reaches back to decry Obama foes; Uses arcane word to describe mood" by Michael Levenson, Globe Staff | May 25, 2010
Governor Deval Patrick, decrying partisanship in Washington, said yesterday that Republican opposition to President Obama is so reflexive that it “is almost at the level of sedition.’’
Can you IMAGINE the GLOBE'S REACTION if a REPUBLICAN said that about Democrats? They would be calling for his resignation.
Of course, DEMOCRATS NEVER PUT UP OPPOSITION; they just PULL DOWN THEIR PANTS and BEND OVER!
*********
“It seems like child’s play compared to what’s going on in Washington, where it is almost at the level of sedition, it feels like to me,’’ the governor told students and faculty at a candidate’s forum at Suffolk Law School’s Rappaport Center....
Yeah, if you CARE about THIS COUNTRY and its CONSTITUTION you are an INSURGENT!!!!!
Sedition is a word not often heard in modern political discourse; Merriam-Webster.com defines it as “in citement of resistance to, or insurrection against, lawful authority.’’
Okay, first of all, ALL the LIES have COST the GOVERNMENT the "lawful" authority!
THEY OBEY NO LAW and EXEMPT THEMSELVES from ALL LAWS so THAT STATEMENT MEANS NOTHING!
Asked about his choice of words after the forum, Patrick told reporters it was a “rhetorical flourish.’’
Yeah, we have smelled that before!
Geoffrey R. Stone, a former dean of the University of Chicago Law School, said sedition “doesn’t even really exist as a legal concept anymore’’ since the Supreme Court has found both the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 and the Sedition Act of 1918 unconstitutional....
“If you take that definition of sedition, then Patrick probably is accurate,’’ Stone said.
Oh, sorry, sig heil.
The Massachusetts Republican Party quickly condemned Patrick for using the word.
“Apparently our First Amendment rights are only guaranteed if we agree with the tax-and-spend policies of Deval Patrick and Barack Obama,’’ Jennifer Nassour, the party chairwoman, said in a statement. “The governor should focus on the critical issues at hand, like lowering property taxes and controlling rampant spending, instead of defending his buddy President Obama.’’
Patrick, however, is not alone in using the term to describe the president’s opponents.
Time columnist Joe Klein, speaking on “The Chris Matthews Show’’ in April, said he “looked up the definition of sedition, which is conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of the state. And a lot of these statements, especially the ones coming from people like Glenn Beck and to a certain extent Sarah Palin, rub right up close to being seditious.’’
Well, I'M NOT WITH THOSE DOUCHE BAGS at all, so PFFFFFFFFTTTT!!!!!!!
Choice comments about halfway down that I did not use today; however, I agree with the suggestions for the guverner (sic):
Comments
