Yeah, you would start to think so, wouldn't you?
Yeah, they will get back to us on these:
"Brown to be quizzed on Iraq after election; British panel’s ruling criticized" by Raphael G. Satter, Associated Press | December 24, 2009
LONDON - British leader Gordon Brown will not testify before his country’s investigation of the Iraq war until after the next general election, the committee behind the inquiry said yesterday.
The same committee he set up?
The Iraq Inquiry, which is investigating the 2003 US-led invasion, said Brown and other senior ministers would not be quizzed until after the election in an effort to keep proceedings clear of party politics....
Of course, WAR IS POLITICS, but....
You know, WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER "official investigation."
See: Prop 102: Iraq and Government Lies
We KNOW WHAT HAPPENED!!!
The decision to delay Brown’s testimony was criticized by Britain’s two leading opposition parties. Britain’s Liberal Democrats said it appeared that John Chilcot, who was appointed by Brown to lead the inquiry earlier this year, was sparing the prime minister a potential embarrassment ahead of a tough election.
Or a PRISON SENTENCE if he can't rig, I mean, win, the election?
So WHEN is the POLL-HELPING FALSE-FLAG due in Britain, 'eh, Gordy?
“This looks like a deal cooked up . . . to save Gordon Brown and his ministers from facing the music,’’ Liberal Democrat lawmaker Edward Davey said in a statement. “Brown signed the checks for the Iraq war, and he should explain that decision before polling day,’’ he added, referring to Brown’s tenure as treasury chief at the time of invasion.
The opposition Conservatives, who unlike the Liberal Democrats supported the invasion, also criticized the inquiry’s decision. Critics of the invasion had long demanded an investigation into whether the war, which has been extremely unpopular in Britain, was illegal.
And MORE THAN THAT! We KNOW it was ILLEGAL!
We want WAR CRIMES and SENTENCES!!!!!!!!!
Many were disappointed when it was disclosed that the inquiry had no power to apportion blame or establish criminal or civil liability. The easygoing tone of questioning has also been criticized....
Then it is a COVER-UP not an 'inquiry."
Still,
I'm SO SICK and TIRED of seeing WORDS my PROFESSORS told me were BAD WORDS for a REPORT!
it remains the most sweeping probe of its kind by any nation involved in the war, and it represents the first time that many senior officials - including British ambassadors to Washington, top foreign policy advisers, spy masters, and military chiefs - have had to answer publicly for their role in the conflict.
Look at the SAD-SACK S*** MSM clapping the war criminal government on the back for its "investigation!"
Most eagerly anticipated is the testimony from Brown’s predecessor, Tony Blair, whose reputation was badly tarnished by his close alliance with former President George W. Bush.
Yeah, TONY KNEW it was a WAR CRIME and wanted a SECOND U.N RESOLUTION to COVER THEIR ASSES!!!
The inquiry said Blair would be called to testify sometime in January or early February.
Related:
"Blair was asked if he would still have supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003 if he had known that the Iraqi regime did not possess "weapons of mass destruction," as his government claimed at the time." Blair at first skirted the question, but then said it would have made no difference. Blair’s statements are grounds for his arraignment on charges of war crimes.
Oh, THAT is DAMNING -- especially because BLIAR and BUSH KNEW there were NO WMD!
That is ONE REASON THEY INVADED! If Saddam had the stuff, would we have invaded? I'd ASK KOREA for the answer to that one.
--more--"
Related: Slow Saturday Special: Brits Take Stock of Iraq War
Also see: Occupation Iraq: Empires Never Have to Say Sorry
Yeah.
Neither does Israel.
"Muslims rap UK pledge on war crimes law" by Associated Press | December 24, 2009
LONDON - Britain’s flagship Muslim organization yesterday attacked a government pledge to reform a war crimes law used to try to arrest visiting Israeli dignitaries, saying the move could hurt Britain’s image in the Middle East.
Nothing dignified about a stinking, lying, war-criminal band of looters.
Yeah, just BEND the LAW to THEIR WILL, British boneheads! Why don't you tattoo a Star of David into your forehead while you are at it.
The Muslim Council of Britain said it was deeply disappointed that the country’s foreign minister, David Miliband, promised to change the law so that judges could no longer issue secret arrest warrants against Israeli officials or military officers, saying the move was biased toward Israel.
Like everything else in the "free" West.
“You appear to be committing the government to the path of selective compliance with the enforcement of international law,’’ the council’s Secretary General Muhammad Abdul Bari wrote in a letter to Miliband. “This is surely not in the best interests of our country as it will add a further dimension to the double standards that our government is seen to have in relation to the politics of the Middle East.’’
Yeah, well, if they don't jerk-off the Zionists the subway will be attacked again, so the Brits are in a bit of a Jewish pickle (the sourest of 'em all).
Britain is one of the European pioneers of universal jurisdiction, a broad legal concept that empowers judges to issue arrest warrants for nearly any visitor accused of committing war crimes anywhere in the world.
Yeah, I remember Belgium changing their law a few years ago to accomodate Rumsfeld.
Because ministers and heads of state tend to enjoy immunity, pro-Palestinian activists in Britain and elsewhere have often set their sights on former Israeli officials - most recently targeting Tzipi Livni, who served as foreign minister at the time of Israel’s attack a year ago on the Gaza Strip. The winter offensive, aimed at ending rocket strikes in Israel, claimed more than 1,400 Palestinian lives, among them hundreds of civilians, and drew a storm of international criticism.
But NO WAR CRIMES CHARGES!
Thirteen Israelis were also killed.
Yeah, well.... you *ews have plucked that heart string too many times.
Israelis were outraged and British government officials embarrassed when it emerged last week that a London judge had issued an arrest warrant for Livni on suspicion of involvement in war crimes.
WHO REALLY GIVES a S*** what that SMALL MINORITY THINKS anyhow?
NOT ME ANYMORE! Maybe SHAME and EMBARRASSMENT is a feeling they shopuld GET USED TO since there is some sort of stench following them around.
The warrant was later withdrawn when it became clear Livni would not come to the country, but the matter badly strained relations between Britain and Israel.
You Brits should consider yourself lucky you didn't have to see that nail-biting scuz.
--more--"
Related: Another Country Under Zionist Control
Yeah, all western governments are, didn't you know that?
Exhibit B:
BRUSSELS - Five Belgians living in Israel filed a complaint yesterday against the Hamas rulers of Gaza, saying militant rocket fire into Israel had violated their human rights.
Yeah, if a *ew is guilty of a crime he will accuse you of it.
Related: War Criminal Defies World Community
How Israel Got the Nuclear Bomb
Puts the rhetoric against Iran into focus, doesn't it?
Belgian courts let citizens living anywhere in the world request criminal prosecutions for violations of their human rights. In 1993, Belgium began allowing war-crimes cases to be filed by people in any country claiming violations of their basic rights. The universal jurisdiction law led to a spate of politically charged cases against leaders like former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon and former president George W. Bush....
Do you know what is not politically charged, readers?
The U.N.
Lawyer Roel Coveliers said he sent the federal prosecutor’s office a complaint about rights violations by the Hamas government from mid-2008 until Jan. 18, when a cease-fire ended several weeks of intense hostilities between Israel and Hamas. He said the complaint targets the radical Palestinian group’s political and military leadership, but names no individuals.
--more--"
Related: War Criminal Defies World Community
What do you mean Hamas didn't actually commit any war crimes?
Also see: A War Criminal Government
Wow, Britain is under Zionist thumb.
And part of their program is the New World Order:
"Britons are skeptical as ID cards roll out; Program stirring privacy concerns among citizens" by Henry Chu, Los Angeles Times | December 26, 2009
MANCHESTER, England - Angela Epstein is proud to be a card-carrying Brit.
A freelance writer, Epstein was first in line here a few weeks ago to register for a voluntary national identification card - the first such cards to be issued in this country since World War II. The pinkish rectangle of plastic nestles inside her purse, close at hand whenever she needs to prove who she is.
YOUR PAPERZ, Englander!!!
“I’m really proud to have one,’’ said Epstein, 42, a lifelong resident of this northern English city. “It says I’m a British citizen. . . . Anything that has that on it is a source of pride to me.’’
Then I will quit wasting my time on you.
But what gives her pride gives others pause. For skeptics, the ID cards represent one more intrusion on their privacy, yet another government attempt to keep tabs on a citizenry that is already among the most monitored on Earth, thanks to the countless cameras mounted in public places. As repositories of biometric data and potentially other kinds of personal information, national ID cards push Britain closer to being a “database state,’’ critics say.
Hey, JUST LIKE US in AmeriKa -- and we can't catch the "terrorist," either!
It might seem like just a big bother now, but it could easily turn into Big Brother later.
Fierce opposition has forced the ruling Labor Party to water down the ID plan since it was conceived several years ago. Once envisaged as mandatory, the cards are now being issued on a voluntary basis for British citizens.
Yeah, FOR NOW! See HOW MANY WILLING SHEEPLE you have before a FALSE-FLAG TERROR ATTACK makes it MANDATORY, right?
They are also being marketed as a convenient tool for consumers and travelers rather than as the powerful weapon against illegal immigration and terrorism that officials originally said they would be.
Yeah, notice how the S***-SELL SPIN always SHIFTS?
But these concessions do not satisfy civil libertarians who insist the program should be abolished.
Yeah, there is NO COMPROMISING when it comes to LIBERTY against the TYRANNY of FALSE FLAG PROPAGANDISTS!!!
It already has proven to be a waste of time and money, they say, and harbors sinister potential for government nosing around in the lives of ordinary people. “It changes the relationship between the state and the individual,’’ said James Elsdon-Baker, an activist with the organization NO2ID. “Everyone in a free democracy has a certain degree of their private life that they’d like to keep to themselves. It removes that privacy.’’
Unless you are an ELITE STINK!
"Certain foreign dignitaries with law enforcement escorts are not subjected to any screening at all .... certain methods of verifying identification documents are not used on all travelers during peak travel"
Yeah, that EXPLAINS DETROIT to some degree, doesn't it?
See:
- Reminding Obama
- From Yemen to Detroit: Delivering the Yoke of Tyra...
- From Detroit to Yemen: The Opening of a New War Front
- From Detroit to Yemen: Dick Smoke Suspect
- From Detroit to Yemen: Taking Stock of Northwest Airlines
- Direct Flight From Detroit to Yemen
The program is being rolled out in stages....
“A card is more convenient. It means if my passport’s off getting a visa or something, I still have the card with me,’’ said Meg Hillier, the Home Office minister in charge of the program, who was left a bit red-faced when she forgot to bring her card with her to a promotional event in Liverpool this week.
Yeah, CONVENIENTLY GIVE UP your LIBERTIES over a LIE!
Goodbye, Britain!
Officials admit changing tack since Parliament approved the program in 2006. Home Secretary Alan Johnson acknowledged in June that the government should not have encouraged the perception of ID cards as a “panacea for terrorism.’’
LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES!!
Plans to make the cards mandatory once enough Britons signed up voluntarily have been dropped.
Right -- as they sign people up voluntarily!!
So WHEN is the NEXT FALSE FLAG ATTACK!
Even smaller efforts at compulsory registration, such as for airport personnel, have had to be abandoned. The only people now required to apply for the $50 cards are foreign workers from outside the EU. The opposition Conservative Party, which is leading in the polls as Britain heads toward a national election that must be held by June, has pledged to scrap the ID cards if it comes to power.
I don't care about politics anywhere anymore; however, WE WILL HOLD YOU to YOUR WORD!!!
The last time Britons were forced to carry government-issued ID cards was more than a half-century ago, as the nation fought the Nazi juggernaut.
So you have FALLEN THAT FAR BACK, huh, Britain?
And keep those Nazis alive, 'eh, jewsmedia!
A JUGGERNAUT -- for a while, anyway!
Yeah, looks like USrael's dreams of empire may not last as long as the decade-long Fourth Reich.
Activists fear that, as the cards become more common and are scanned by electronic readers in shops, hospitals, and other places, people’s spending habits, medical histories, religious beliefs, and even sexual practices could eventually wind up in a government database somewhere.
Well, it HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE!!!
They NEVER THROW ANYTHING AWAY unless it INCRIMINATES THEMSELVES!
And with a government that has faced a string of embarrassing scandals over confidential data being stolen or left on trains by forgetful officials, who can be sure that such personal information will not end up in the wrong hands?
Yeah, they can CRAWL UP YOUR ASS and VIOLATE YOUR VERY SOUL to "protect" you -- and then they CAN'T EVEN PROTECT YOUR INFORMATION!!
The JIG is UP, Red Coats!
“It’s not so much about the card; it’s about the database behind it,’’ Elsdon-Baker said. “We don’t have faith in the government’s ability to look after our data securely.’’
WHO DOES anywhere?
No one on EARTH as far as I can tell!
--more--"
