Friday, March 13, 2009

Ocean Farts Causing Global Warming

They will stop at nothing to sell this ball of s***.

I'm so sick of hearing global-warming from the lying agenda-pushers, readers, when it's 20-degrees outside. Yup, the ground is frozen here today in New England, in the middle of March.

Sigh.


"Climate change affecting plankton; Earth's basic food declines in north" by Associated Press | March 13, 2009

WASHINGTON - Changing wind patterns linked to global warming are altering the food chain in Antarctica and may lead to further increases in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere....

A separate report in the same edition of Science raises the possibility that new wind patterns could result in more upwelling of deep water in the region, which would then release stored carbon dioxide, potentially increasing global warming....

Well, WHATEVER IT IS sure does STINK!!!

--more--"

Related: MSM Lying Makes You Depressed

The Global Warming Scam

Scientists Admit They Made Up Global Warming Data

Global Warming Will Last One-Thousand Years

And yet the Globe's gas keeps coming:

"Airborne pollution dimming skies around much of the world; Phenomenon is everywhere except Europe" by Associated Press | March 13, 2009

I heard that air pollution is the
cure For Global Warming.

And I AGREE on the POLLUTION!
The FOULING of our LAND, SEA and AIR is FAR MORE IMPORTANT than some FART-MISTING AGENDA that is FULL of LIES!! Have you BEEN OUTSIDE THIS WINTER?

WASHINGTON - The skies are dimming, for most of the world.

Increases in airborne pollution have dimmed the skies by blocking sunlight over the past 30 years, researchers report in today's edition of the journal Science.

While decreases in atmospheric visibility - known as global dimming - have been reported in the past, the new study compiles satellite and land-based data for a longer period than had been available.

"Creation of this database is a big step forward for researching long-term changes in air pollution and correlating these with climate change," Kaicun Wang, assistant research scientist in the University of Maryland, said in a statement....

They reported that dimming is occurring everywhere except Europe, where declines in pollution have resulted in brighter skies. Changes in aerosols can affect weather and also may have an impact on climate, though past studies have been inconclusive.

Sigh.

These pollutants can result in cooling by reflecting sunlight back into space, but they also can absorb solar energy, warming the atmosphere.

Sigh!

Researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration warned that suggestions for a high-atmosphere "sunshade" of particles to battle global warming could reduce energy production from solar power plants.

How come the enviro nutties screw us at every turn! The nutty-crunchy lies are HARMFUL, folks!! Time to put 'em on the spit, warm ourselves up, and eat 'em!

Those proposals are aimed at blocking sunlight that can be absorbed by so-called greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, warming the climate. But airborne particles also scatter light that does get through, and that diffuse light cannot be used by solar energy concentrating systems that produce electricity, Daniel Murphy, a scientist at NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo., reported in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

Flat photovoltaic and hot water panels, commonly seen on household roofs, use both diffuse and direct sunlight, so they would be less affected.

--more--"

And you remember the DISASTER of
ETHANOL, right?

"Studies in the past year have concluded that the rush to biofuels has had some disastrous if unintended consequences: less food available to eat in poor countries, skyrocketing global grain prices and a loss of forests as farmers create new fields to join in the biofuel boom"

Good Lord! Contributing to deforestation? Thanks for PUSHING this SHIT AGENDA, MSM!!!!

And was it "unintended," readers?: Fighting For Food

Shove your fucking "solutions," you cretinous pieces of filth!!!!

"Well, besides using up food crops and driving up food prices, producing a far less energetic fuel that you have to buy and burn more of to get the same work, and setting aside the fact that ethanol fuel destroys the engine gaskets in the fuel system, what's to doubt? I mean, it's not like biofuel was supposed to actually work; it's just another sounds-good-on-TV not-quite-thought-all-the-way-through jingo for political campaigns." -- Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com

And NOW the DUPLICITOUS GLOBE is OPINING AGIN IT after being ALL FOR IT YEARS AGO!!

They act like WE FORGET THINGS out here, the elite scum-s***s!!!!


"King Corn cows Washington

PRESIDENT OBAMA has said science on his watch will not be "distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda."

Yeah, I saw that:
Obama to Admit 9/11 and Environment Frauds

But when it comes to the political agenda of agribusiness, his own Cabinet, and his party, are letting science down to prop up corn-based ethanol.

And a couple of tower collapses.


Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, formerly the governor of the corn state of Iowa, wants "aggressive action" from the Environmental Protection Agency to increase the amount of ethanol in gasoline - from 10 percent of the blend to 15 percent. He has been seconded by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Senate Agriculture Committee chairman Tom Harkin, also from Iowa; and the Governors Biofuels Coalition, co-chaired by Democrat Chet Culver of Iowa.

See: U.S. Wants to Starve You and Ruin Your Car Engine at the Same Time

All this advocacy is for a substance that is receiving billions of dollars in subsidies already, despite growing evidence of its environmental harm.

Oh my God, TRUTH in the PAPER!!!!!
And YOU are PAYING FOR IT, taxpayers!!!!

A year ago, researchers from Princeton, Georgetown, Iowa State, and Woods Hole found that increased production of corn-based ethanol would devour forests and grasslands, and possibly double greenhouse gas emissions over 30 years.

A paper this winter in the online journal Energy and Environmental Science by Stanford researcher Mark Jacobson ranked corn-based ethanol fuel at the bottom of alternative energy sources, "with respect to climate, air pollution, land use, wildlife damage and chemical waste."

This does not even get into the problems associated with the diversion of corn from food for people and feed for livestock.... The evidence is mounting that ethanol is not even worth the transition. Ethanol provides a bold moment for Obama to prove he isn't just a cornfield scarecrow, and that he has the stuffing to shoo away politics with the power of science.

--more--"

Now if only he would shoo away Israel.